These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
373 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26795606)
1. Effect of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy in older men. Adejoro O; Gupta P; Ziegelmann M; Weight C; Konety B Urol Oncol; 2016 May; 34(5):234.e1-11. PubMed ID: 26795606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy. Hu JC; Gu X; Lipsitz SR; Barry MJ; D'Amico AV; Weinberg AC; Keating NL JAMA; 2009 Oct; 302(14):1557-64. PubMed ID: 19826025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of minimally invasive and open radical prostatectomy surgeon volume. Choi WW; Gu X; Lipsitz SR; D'Amico AV; Williams SB; Hu JC Urol Oncol; 2012 Sep; 30(5):569-76. PubMed ID: 20822929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Temporal national trends of minimally invasive and retropubic radical prostatectomy outcomes from 2003 to 2007: results from the 100% Medicare sample. Kowalczyk KJ; Levy JM; Caplan CF; Lipsitz SR; Yu HY; Gu X; Hu JC Eur Urol; 2012 Apr; 61(4):803-9. PubMed ID: 22209053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radical prostatectomy innovation and outcomes at military and civilian institutions. Leow JJ; Weissman JS; Kimsey L; Hoburg A; Helmchen LA; Jiang W; Hevelone N; Lipsitz SR; Nguyen LL; Chang SL Am J Manag Care; 2017 Jun; 23(6):342-347. PubMed ID: 28817298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The association of lymph node dissection with 30-day perioperative morbidity among men undergoing minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). Brito J; Pereira J; Moreira DM; Pareek G; Tucci C; Guo R; Zhang Z; Amin A; Mega A; Renzulli J; Golijanin D; Gershman B Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2018 Jun; 21(2):245-251. PubMed ID: 29858588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative effectiveness, cost, and utilization of radical prostatectomy among young men within managed care insurance plans. Shih YC; Ward JF; Pettaway CA; Xu Y; Matin SF; Davis JW; Thompson BP; Elting LS Value Health; 2012; 15(2):367-75. PubMed ID: 22433769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. Hu JC; Wang Q; Pashos CL; Lipsitz SR; Keating NL J Clin Oncol; 2008 May; 26(14):2278-84. PubMed ID: 18467718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The diffusion of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy in the United States: a case study of the introduction of new surgical devices. Anderson CB; Elkin EB; Atoria CL; Eastham JA; Scardino PT; Touijer K Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2015 Mar; 18(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 25512262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patterns of care for radical prostatectomy in the United States from 2003 to 2005. Hu JC; Hevelone ND; Ferreira MD; Lipsitz SR; Choueiri TK; Sanda MG; Earle CC J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):1969-74. PubMed ID: 18801512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A population-based analysis of temporal perioperative complication rates after minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. Schmitges J; Trinh QD; Abdollah F; Sun M; Bianchi M; Budäus L; Zorn K; Perotte P; Schlomm T; Haese A; Montorsi F; Menon M; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI Eur Urol; 2011 Sep; 60(3):564-71. PubMed ID: 21723034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is a treatment delay in radical prostatectomy safe in individuals with low-risk prostate cancer? Sun M; Abdollah F; Hansen J; Trinh QD; Bianchi M; Tian Z; Briganti A; Shariat SF; Montorsi F; Perrotte P; Karakiewicz PI J Sex Med; 2012 Nov; 9(11):2961-9. PubMed ID: 22672479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative effectiveness of perineal versus retropubic and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. Prasad SM; Gu X; Lavelle R; Lipsitz SR; Hu JC J Urol; 2011 Jan; 185(1):111-5. PubMed ID: 21074198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample. Trinh QD; Sammon J; Sun M; Ravi P; Ghani KR; Bianchi M; Jeong W; Shariat SF; Hansen J; Schmitges J; Jeldres C; Rogers CG; Peabody JO; Montorsi F; Menon M; Karakiewicz PI Eur Urol; 2012 Apr; 61(4):679-85. PubMed ID: 22206800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perioperative outcomes for laparoscopic and robotic compared with open prostatectomy using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Liu JJ; Maxwell BG; Panousis P; Chung BI Urology; 2013 Sep; 82(3):579-83. PubMed ID: 23876584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Variations in surgeon volume and use of pelvic lymph node dissection with open and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. Prasad SM; Keating NL; Wang Q; Pashos CL; Lipsitz S; Richie JP; Hu JC Urology; 2008 Sep; 72(3):647-52; discussion 652-3. PubMed ID: 18649928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Temporal trends and predictors of pelvic lymph node dissection in open or minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. Feifer AH; Elkin EB; Lowrance WT; Denton B; Jacks L; Yee DS; Coleman JA; Laudone VP; Scardino PT; Eastham JA Cancer; 2011 Sep; 117(17):3933-42. PubMed ID: 21412757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Concurrent Inguinal Hernia Repair in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Study. Xia L; Taylor BL; Patel NA; Chelluri RR; Raman JD; Scherr DS; Guzzo TJ J Endourol; 2018 Jul; 32(7):665-670. PubMed ID: 29717658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incidence of incisional hernia after minimally invasive and open radical prostatectomy: a population-based nationwide study. Hermann M; Gustafsson O; Sandblom G Scand J Urol; 2017 Aug; 51(4):264-268. PubMed ID: 28398125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]