391 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26796680)
1. MarginProbe© reduces the rate of re-excision following breast conserving surgery for breast cancer.
Blohmer JU; Tanko J; Kueper J; Groß J; Völker R; Machleidt A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Aug; 294(2):361-7. PubMed ID: 26796680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Single institution's randomized double-armed prospective study of lumpectomy margins with adjunctive use of the MarginProbe in nonpalpable breast cancers.
Geha RC; Taback B; Cadena L; Borden B; Feldman S
Breast J; 2020 Nov; 26(11):2157-2162. PubMed ID: 32772474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized prospective study of lumpectomy margin assessment with use of MarginProbe in patients with nonpalpable breast malignancies.
Schnabel F; Boolbol SK; Gittleman M; Karni T; Tafra L; Feldman S; Police A; Friedman NB; Karlan S; Holmes D; Willey SC; Carmon M; Fernandez K; Akbari S; Harness J; Guerra L; Frazier T; Lane K; Simmons RM; Estabrook A; Allweis T
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 May; 21(5):1589-95. PubMed ID: 24595800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of MarginProbe as an adjunct to standard operating procedure does not significantly reduce re-excision rates in breast conserving surgery.
LeeVan E; Ho BT; Seto S; Shen J
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Aug; 183(1):145-151. PubMed ID: 32607640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of intra-operative margin management techniques in breast-conserving surgery: a standardised approach reduces the likelihood of residual disease without increasing operative time.
Bolger JC; Solon JG; Khan SA; Hill AD; Power CP
Breast Cancer; 2015 May; 22(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 23649303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rate of re-excision after breast-conserving surgery for invasive lobular carcinoma.
Wanis ML; Wong JA; Rodriguez S; Wong JM; Jabo B; Ashok A; Lum SS; Solomon NL; Reeves ME; Garberoglio CA; Senthil M
Am Surg; 2013 Oct; 79(10):1119-22. PubMed ID: 24160812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A novel modality for intraoperative margin assessment and its impact on re-excision rates in breast conserving surgery.
Kupstas A; Ibrar W; Hayward RD; Ockner D; Wesen C; Falk J
Am J Surg; 2018 Mar; 215(3):400-403. PubMed ID: 29191356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.
Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Sahin AA; Kuerer HM; Babiera GV; Singletary SE; Whitman GJ; Ross MI; Ames FC; Feig BW; Buchholz TA; Meric-Bernstam F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1458-71. PubMed ID: 17260108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MarginProbe®--final results of the German post-market study in breast conserving surgery of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Thill M; Dittmer C; Baumann K; Friedrichs K; Blohmer JU
Breast; 2014 Feb; 23(1):94-6. PubMed ID: 24291375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sampling of secondary margins decreases the need for re-excision after partial mastectomy.
Guidroz JA; Larrieux G; Liao J; Sugg SL; Scott-Conner CE; Weigel RJ
Surgery; 2011 Oct; 150(4):802-9. PubMed ID: 22000194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Influence of Repeat Surgery and Residual Disease on Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group Study.
Bodilsen A; Bjerre K; Offersen BV; Vahl P; Ejlertsen B; Overgaard J; Christiansen P
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 22 Suppl 3():S476-85. PubMed ID: 26178760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Relationship of Breast Density and Positive Lumpectomy Margins.
Gooch JC; Yoon E; Chun J; Kaplowitz E; Jubas T; Guth A; Axelrod D; Shapiro R; Darvishian F; Schnabel F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Jun; 26(6):1729-1736. PubMed ID: 30888516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgeon Volume, Patient Age, and Tumor-Related Factors Influence the Need for Re-Excision After Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Hughes L; Hamm J; McGahan C; Baliski C
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):656-664. PubMed ID: 27718033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reoperation Rates in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ vs Invasive Breast Cancer After Wire-Guided Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Langhans L; Jensen MB; Talman MM; Vejborg I; Kroman N; Tvedskov TF
JAMA Surg; 2017 Apr; 152(4):378-384. PubMed ID: 28002557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of re-excision for positive and close resection margins in patients treated with breast-conserving surgery.
Biglia N; Ponzone R; Bounous VE; Mariani LL; Maggiorotto F; Benevelli C; Liberale V; Ottino MC; Sismondi P
Breast; 2014 Dec; 23(6):870-5. PubMed ID: 25305040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Imaging of lumpectomy surface with large field-of-view confocal laser scanning microscope for intraoperative margin assessment - POLARHIS study.
Sandor MF; Schwalbach B; Hofmann V; Istrate SE; Schuller Z; Ionescu E; Heimann S; Ragazzi M; Lux MP
Breast; 2022 Dec; 66():118-125. PubMed ID: 36240525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of Consensus Guidelines by the Society of Surgical Oncology and the American Society for Radiation Oncology on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery in Stages 1 and 2 Invasive Breast Cancer.
Chung A; Gangi A; Amersi F; Bose S; Zhang X; Giuliano A
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 22 Suppl 3():S422-7. PubMed ID: 26310280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Margin Assessment and Re-excision Rates for Patients Who Have Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Cen C; Chun J; Kaplowitz E; Axelrod D; Shapiro R; Guth A; Schnabel F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 28(9):5142-5148. PubMed ID: 33635409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictors of Surgical Margin Following Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Large Population-Based Cohort Study.
van Deurzen CH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):627-633. PubMed ID: 27590331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does intra-operative margin assessment improve margin status and re-excision rates? A population-based analysis of outcomes in breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ.
Laws A; Brar MS; Bouchard-Fortier A; Leong B; Quan ML
J Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 118(7):1205-1211. PubMed ID: 30293241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
