These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26796950)

  • 1. The effect of framing on surrogate optimism bias: A simulation study.
    Patel D; Cohen ED; Barnato AE
    J Crit Care; 2016 Apr; 32():85-8. PubMed ID: 26796950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of emotion and physician communication behaviors on surrogates' life-sustaining treatment decisions: a randomized simulation experiment.
    Barnato AE; Arnold RM
    Crit Care Med; 2013 Jul; 41(7):1686-91. PubMed ID: 23660727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Influence of Surrogate Decision Makers on Clinical Decision Making for Critically Ill Adults.
    Shah RD; Rasinski KA; Alexander GC
    J Intensive Care Med; 2015 Jul; 30(5):278-85. PubMed ID: 24362444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prevalence of and Factors Related to Discordance About Prognosis Between Physicians and Surrogate Decision Makers of Critically Ill Patients.
    White DB; Ernecoff N; Buddadhumaruk P; Hong S; Weissfeld L; Curtis JR; Luce JM; Lo B
    JAMA; 2016 May; 315(19):2086-94. PubMed ID: 27187301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. "It's not just what the doctor tells me:" factors that influence surrogate decision-makers' perceptions of prognosis.
    Boyd EA; Lo B; Evans LR; Malvar G; Apatira L; Luce JM; White DB
    Crit Care Med; 2010 May; 38(5):1270-5. PubMed ID: 20228686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality of communication in the ICU and surrogate's understanding of prognosis.
    Chiarchiaro J; Buddadhumaruk P; Arnold RM; White DB
    Crit Care Med; 2015 Mar; 43(3):542-8. PubMed ID: 25687030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 'Do not attempt resuscitation' and 'cardiopulmonary resuscitation' in an inpatient setting: factors influencing physicians' decisions in Switzerland.
    Becerra M; Hurst SA; Junod Perron N; Cochet S; Elger BS
    Gerontology; 2011; 57(5):414-21. PubMed ID: 21099190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of life-story narrative for end-of-life surrogate's decision-making is inadequate: a Q-methodology study.
    Hammami MM; Abuhdeeb K; Hammami MB; De Padua SJS; Al-Balkhi A
    BMC Med Ethics; 2019 May; 20(1):28. PubMed ID: 31053127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Decision conflict and regret among surrogate decision makers in the medical intensive care unit.
    Miller JJ; Morris P; Files DC; Gower E; Young M
    J Crit Care; 2016 Apr; 32():79-84. PubMed ID: 26810482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Understanding cardiopulmonary resuscitation decision making: perspectives of seriously ill hospitalized patients and family members.
    Heyland DK; Frank C; Groll D; Pichora D; Dodek P; Rocker G; Gafni A
    Chest; 2006 Aug; 130(2):419-28. PubMed ID: 16899840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characteristics of discussions on cardiopulmonary resuscitation between physicians and surrogates of critically ill patients.
    Almoosa KF; Goldenhar LM; Panos RJ
    J Crit Care; 2009 Jun; 24(2):280-7. PubMed ID: 19427765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What CPR means to surrogate decision makers of ICU patients.
    Shif Y; Doshi P; Almoosa KF
    Resuscitation; 2015 May; 90():73-8. PubMed ID: 25711518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Multicenter Study of the Causes and Consequences of Optimistic Expectations About Prognosis by Surrogate Decision-Makers in ICUs.
    White DB; Carson S; Anderson W; Steingrub J; Bird G; Curtis JR; Matthay M; Peterson M; Buddadhumaruk P; Shields AM; Ernecoff N; Shotsberger K; Weissfeld L; Chang CH; Pike F; Lo B; Hough CL
    Crit Care Med; 2019 Sep; 47(9):1184-1193. PubMed ID: 31162200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Deferred decision making: patients' reliance on family and physicians for CPR decisions in critical care.
    Kim SH; Kjervik D
    Nurs Ethics; 2005 Sep; 12(5):493-506. PubMed ID: 16178345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The not unreasonable standard for assessment of surrogates and surrogate decisions.
    Rhodes R; Holzman IR
    Theor Med Bioeth; 2004; 25(4):367-85. PubMed ID: 15637950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surrogates' predictions of seriously ill patients' resuscitation preferences.
    Layde PM; Beam CA; Broste SK; Connors AF; Desbiens N; Lynn J; Phillips RS; Reding D; Teno J; Vidaillet H
    Arch Fam Med; 1995 Jun; 4(6):518-23. PubMed ID: 7773427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Randomized Controlled Trial of a CPR and Intubation Video Decision Support Tool for Hospitalized Patients.
    El-Jawahri A; Mitchell SL; Paasche-Orlow MK; Temel JS; Jackson VA; Rutledge RR; Parikh M; Davis AD; Gillick MR; Barry MJ; Lopez L; Walker-Corkery ES; Chang Y; Finn K; Coley C; Volandes AE
    J Gen Intern Med; 2015 Aug; 30(8):1071-80. PubMed ID: 25691237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators.
    JAMA; 1995 Nov 22-29; 274(20):1591-8. PubMed ID: 7474243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors Related to the Differential Preference for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Between Patients With Terminal Cancer and That of Their Respective Family Caregivers.
    Hwang IC; Keam B; Kim YA; Yun YH
    Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 2016 Feb; 33(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 25138648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Decisions and Authority.
    Kaebnick GE
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2017 Jan; 47(1):2. PubMed ID: 28074576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.