These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26796950)

  • 21. Development, validation, and results of a survey to measure understanding of cardiopulmonary resuscitation choices among ICU patients and their surrogate decision makers.
    Wilson ME; Akhoundi A; Krupa AK; Hinds RF; Litell JM; Gajic O; Kashani K
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2014 Mar; 14():15. PubMed ID: 24606839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Ethical aspects of determining and communicating prognosis in critical care.
    Bernat JL
    Neurocrit Care; 2004; 1(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 16174905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. How--and when--to obtain consent for do-not-resuscitate orders. Clinical guidelines and strategies for resolving conflicts.
    Fleming C; Mallepalli J; Brensilver JM; Brandstetter RD
    J Crit Illn; 1995 Oct; 10(10):679-81, 686, 690-1. PubMed ID: 10155743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Ethics, choices, and decisions in acute medicine: a national survey of Norwegian physicians' attitudes.
    Hansen TW; Janvier A; Aasland O; Førde R
    Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2013 Feb; 14(2):e63-9. PubMed ID: 23388577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Recommendations to limit life support: a national survey of critical care physicians.
    Brush DR; Rasinski KA; Hall JB; Alexander GC
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2012 Oct; 186(7):633-9. PubMed ID: 22837382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A randomized trial of two methods to disclose prognosis to surrogate decision makers in intensive care units.
    Lee Char SJ; Evans LR; Malvar GL; White DB
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2010 Oct; 182(7):905-9. PubMed ID: 20538959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Surrogate decision makers' interpretation of prognostic information: a mixed-methods study.
    Zier LS; Sottile PD; Hong SY; Weissfield LA; White DB
    Ann Intern Med; 2012 Mar; 156(5):360-6. PubMed ID: 22393131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. What should we say when discussing "code status" and life support with a patient? A Delphi analysis.
    Downar J; Hawryluck L
    J Palliat Med; 2010 Feb; 13(2):185-95. PubMed ID: 19929226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Decisions for and against resuscitation in an acute geriatric medicine unit serving the frail elderly.
    Torian LV; Davidson EJ; Fillit HM; Fulop G; Sell LL
    Arch Intern Med; 1992 Mar; 152(3):561-5. PubMed ID: 1510746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Experience with a hospital policy on not offering cardiopulmonary resuscitation when believed more harmful than beneficial.
    Courtwright AM; Brackett S; Cadge W; Krakauer EL; Robinson EM
    J Crit Care; 2015 Feb; 30(1):173-7. PubMed ID: 25457115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Decision to resuscitate or not in patients with chronic diseases.
    Saltbaek L; Tvedegaard E
    Dan Med J; 2012 Jan; 59(1):A4353. PubMed ID: 22239838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Association of Communication Interventions to Discuss Code Status With Patient Decisions for Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Becker C; Lecheler L; Hochstrasser S; Metzger KA; Widmer M; Thommen EB; Nienhaus K; Ewald H; Meier CA; Rueter F; Schaefert R; Bassetti S; Hunziker S
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Jun; 2(6):e195033. PubMed ID: 31173119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A Randomized Controlled Trial of a CPR Decision Support Video for Patients Admitted to the General Medicine Service.
    Merino AM; Greiner R; Hartwig K
    J Hosp Med; 2017 Sep; 12(9):700-704. PubMed ID: 28914272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Outcomes, preferences for resuscitation, and physician-patient communication among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.
    Haidet P; Hamel MB; Davis RB; Wenger N; Reding D; Kussin PS; Connors AF; Lynn J; Weeks JC; Phillips RS
    Am J Med; 1998 Sep; 105(3):222-9. PubMed ID: 9753025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Old age and poor prognosis increase the likelihood of disagreement between cancer patients and their oncologists on the indication for resuscitation attempt.
    Saltbaek L; Michelsen HM; Nelausen KM; Gut R; Nielsen DL
    Support Care Cancer; 2013 Dec; 21(12):3363-70. PubMed ID: 23925557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [To resuscitate or not? The emergency physician's decision in the prehospital setting].
    Mohr M; Busch M; Bahr J; Kettler D
    Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2003 May; 38(5):341-8. PubMed ID: 12712399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Discussing the resuscitation policy at a geriatric ward: the experience of patients or their representatives].
    Bressers JP; Algra A; Dautzenberg PL; van Delden JJ
    Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr; 2011 Dec; 42(6):256-62. PubMed ID: 22250368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Association Between Shared Decision-Making During Family Meetings and Surrogates' Trust in Their ICU Physician.
    Lincoln TE; Buddadhumaruk P; Arnold RM; Scheunemann LP; Ernecoff NC; Chang CH; Carson SS; Hough CL; Curtis JR; Anderson W; Steingrub J; Peterson MW; Lo B; Matthay MA; White DB
    Chest; 2023 May; 163(5):1214-1224. PubMed ID: 36336000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Substituted judgment in principle and practice: a national physician survey.
    Combs MP; Rasinski KA; Yoon JD; Curlin FA
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2013 Jul; 88(7):666-73. PubMed ID: 23809317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Development and Pilot Testing of a Simulation to Study How Physicians Facilitate Surrogate Decision Making Based on Critically Ill Patients' Values and Preferences.
    Scheunemann LP; Khalil R; Rajagopal PS; Arnold RM
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2019 Feb; 57(2):216-223.e8. PubMed ID: 30408496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.