170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26800227)
1. Can Carbon Nanomaterials Improve CZTS Photovoltaic Devices? Evaluation of Performance and Impacts Using Integrated Life-Cycle Assessment and Decision Analysis.
Scott RP; Cullen AC; Fox-Lent C; Linkov I
Risk Anal; 2016 Oct; 36(10):1916-1935. PubMed ID: 26800227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Social life cycle assessment and participatory approaches: A methodological proposal applied to citrus farming in Southern Italy.
De Luca AI; Iofrida N; Strano A; Falcone G; Gulisano G
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2015 Jul; 11(3):383-96. PubMed ID: 25556911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. SCORE: a novel multi-criteria decision analysis approach to assessing the sustainability of contaminated land remediation.
Rosén L; Back PE; Söderqvist T; Norrman J; Brinkhoff P; Norberg T; Volchko Y; Norin M; Bergknut M; Döberl G
Sci Total Environ; 2015 Apr; 511():621-38. PubMed ID: 25594905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Benefits and risks of emerging technologies: integrating life cycle assessment and decision analysis to assess lumber treatment alternatives.
Tsang MP; Bates ME; Madison M; Linkov I
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Oct; 48(19):11543-50. PubMed ID: 25209330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Application of stochastic multiattribute analysis to assessment of single walled carbon nanotube synthesis processes.
Canis L; Linkov I; Seager TP
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Nov; 44(22):8704-11. PubMed ID: 20964398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Uncertainty in multi-media fate and transport models: a case study for TNT life cycle assessment.
Mayo M; Collier ZA; Hoang V; Chappell M
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Oct; 494-495():104-12. PubMed ID: 25037048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A distance-based uncertainty analysis approach to multi-criteria decision analysis for water resource decision making.
Hyde KM; Maier HR; Colby CB
J Environ Manage; 2005 Dec; 77(4):278-90. PubMed ID: 16288957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Safety considerations for graphene: lessons learnt from carbon nanotubes.
Bussy C; Ali-Boucetta H; Kostarelos K
Acc Chem Res; 2013 Mar; 46(3):692-701. PubMed ID: 23163827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantifying and reducing uncertainty in life cycle assessment using the Bayesian Monte Carlo method.
Lo SC; Ma HW; Lo SL
Sci Total Environ; 2005 Mar; 340(1-3):23-33. PubMed ID: 15752490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A multicriteria decision analysis model and risk assessment framework for carbon capture and storage.
Humphries Choptiany JM; Pelot R
Risk Anal; 2014 Sep; 34(9):1720-37. PubMed ID: 24772997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nanotechnology for implantable sensors: carbon nanotubes and graphene in medicine.
Wujcik EK; Monty CN
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol; 2013; 5(3):233-49. PubMed ID: 23450525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Illustrating anticipatory life cycle assessment for emerging photovoltaic technologies.
Wender BA; Foley RW; Prado-Lopez V; Ravikumar D; Eisenberg DA; Hottle TA; Sadowski J; Flanagan WP; Fisher A; Laurin L; Bates ME; Linkov I; Seager TP; Fraser MP; Guston DH
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Sep; 48(18):10531-8. PubMed ID: 25121583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Confronting uncertainty and missing values in environmental value transfer as applied to species conservation.
Akter S; Grafton RQ
Conserv Biol; 2010 Oct; 24(5):1407-17. PubMed ID: 20337683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Aggregating sustainability indicators: beyond the weighted sum.
Rowley HV; Peters GM; Lundie S; Moore SJ
J Environ Manage; 2012 Nov; 111():24-33. PubMed ID: 22813856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Application of stochastic approach based on Monte Carlo (MC) simulation for life cycle inventory (LCI) to the steel process chain: case study.
Bieda B
Sci Total Environ; 2014 May; 481():649-55. PubMed ID: 24290145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The possibility of chemically inert, graphene-based all-carbon electronic devices with 0.8 eV gap.
Qi JS; Huang JY; Feng J; Shi da N; Li J
ACS Nano; 2011 May; 5(5):3475-82. PubMed ID: 21456598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Regulatory requirements and optimization of multiple criteria decision analysis to quantify the benefit-risk assessment of medical devices.
Su G; Deng D
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2023 Apr; 20(4):273-281. PubMed ID: 36896851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Demonstration of a modelling-based multi-criteria decision analysis procedure for prioritisation of occupational risks from manufactured nanomaterials.
Hristozov D; Zabeo A; Alstrup Jensen K; Gottardo S; Isigonis P; Maccalman L; Critto A; Marcomini A
Nanotoxicology; 2016 Nov; 10(9):1215-28. PubMed ID: 26853193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Carbon nanomaterials for electronics, optoelectronics, photovoltaics, and sensing.
Jariwala D; Sangwan VK; Lauhon LJ; Marks TJ; Hersam MC
Chem Soc Rev; 2013 Apr; 42(7):2824-60. PubMed ID: 23124307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Two approaches to incorporate clinical data uncertainty into multiple criteria decision analysis for benefit-risk assessment of medicinal products.
Wen S; Zhang L; Yang B
Value Health; 2014 Jul; 17(5):619-28. PubMed ID: 25128056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
