These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26800647)

  • 1. One-year clinical evaluation of different types of bulk-fill composites.
    Bayraktar Y; Ercan E; Hamidi MM; Çolak H
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2017 May; 8(2):. PubMed ID: 26800647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 24-Month Clinical Evaluation of Different Bulk-Fill Restorative Resins in Class II Restorations.
    Guney T; Yazici AR
    Oper Dent; 2020; 45(2):123-133. PubMed ID: 31693438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of different placement techniques on the clinical success of bulk-fill resin composites placed in Class II cavities: a 4-year randomized controlled clinical study.
    Çakır Kılınç NN; Demirbuğa S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Feb; 27(2):541-557. PubMed ID: 36222961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical performance of ormocer, nanofilled, and nanoceramic resin composites in Class I and Class II restorations: a three-year evaluation.
    Mahmoud SH; El-Embaby AE; AbdAllah AM
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 23614660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of marginal integrity of four bulk-fill dental composite materials: in vitro study.
    Orłowski M; Tarczydło B; Chałas R
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2015; 2015():701262. PubMed ID: 25874254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-year clinical evaluation of a silorane composite resin.
    Walter R; Boushell LW; Heymann HO; Ritter AV; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD; Chung Y; Swift EJ
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(3):179-90. PubMed ID: 24344912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-year clinical evaluation of different restorative resins in class I restorations.
    Yazici AR; Ustunkol I; Ozgunaltay G; Dayangac B
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 24754716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical performance of two ion-releasing bulk-fill composites in class I and class II restorations: A two-year evaluation.
    Albelasy EH; Hamama HH; Chew HP; Montasser M; Mahmoud SH
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 May; 36(5):723-736. PubMed ID: 38174898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Thirty-Six-Month Clinical Comparison of Bulk Fill and Nanofill Composite Restorations.
    Yazici AR; Antonson SA; Kutuk ZB; Ergin E
    Oper Dent; 2017; 42(5):478-485. PubMed ID: 28581919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Six-year clinical evaluation of bulk-fill and nanofill resin composite restorations.
    Yazici AR; Kutuk ZB; Ergin E; Karahan S; Antonson SA
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jan; 26(1):417-426. PubMed ID: 34110494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of high viscosity bulk-fill resin composite restorations.
    Berti LS; Turssi CP; Amaral FL; Basting RT; Junqueira JLC; Panzarella FK; Reis AF; França FM
    Am J Dent; 2020 Aug; 33(4):213-217. PubMed ID: 32794397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A 15-year randomized controlled study of a reduced shrinkage stress resin composite.
    van Dijken JW; Lindberg A
    Dent Mater; 2015 Sep; 31(9):1150-8. PubMed ID: 26205382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two-year clinical performance of sonic-resin placement system in posterior restorations.
    Atabek D; Aktaş N; Sakaryali D; Bani M
    Quintessence Int; 2017; 48(9):743-751. PubMed ID: 28849804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Repair of dimethacrylate-based composite restorations by a silorane-based composite: a one-year randomized clinical trial.
    Popoff DA; Santa Rosa TT; Ferreira RC; Magalhães CS; Moreira AN; Mjör IA
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):E1-10. PubMed ID: 22616930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations: A 5-year randomized controlled clinical study.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    J Dent; 2016 Aug; 51():29-35. PubMed ID: 27238052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Randomized prospective clinical trial of class II restorations using flowable bulk-fill resin composites: 4-year follow-up.
    Endo Hoshino IA; Fraga Briso AL; Bueno Esteves LM; Dos Santos PH; Meira Borghi Frascino S; Fagundes TC
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Sep; 26(9):5697-5710. PubMed ID: 35556174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial of one nano-hybrid and one high-viscosity bulk-fill composite restorative systems in class II cavities: 12 months results.
    Colak H; Tokay U; Uzgur R; Hamidi MM; Ercan E
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Jul; 20(7):822-831. PubMed ID: 28791976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Six-year clinical evaluation of packable composite restorations.
    Kiremitci A; Alpaslan T; Gurgan S
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 19192832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-year clinical evaluation of class II posterior composite restorations placed with different techniques and flowable composite linings in endodontically treated teeth.
    Karaman E; Keskin B; Inan U
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Mar; 21(2):709-716. PubMed ID: 27538739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical Evaluation of Sonic-Activated High Viscosity Bulk-Fill Nanohybrid Resin Composite Restorations in Class II Cavities: A Prospective Clinical Study up to 2 Years.
    Akalιn TT; Bozkurt FO; Kusdemir M; Özsoy A; Özcan M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2018 Aug; 26(3):152-160. PubMed ID: 30063305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.