These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26800673)

  • 1. A hybrid approach for quantifying aortic valve stenosis using impedance cardiography and echocardiography.
    Daralammouri Y; Ayoub K; Badrieh N; Lauer B
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 Jan; 16():19. PubMed ID: 26800673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of dual-source computed tomography for the quantification of the aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis versus transthoracic echocardiography and invasive hemodynamic assessment.
    Ropers D; Ropers U; Marwan M; Schepis T; Pflederer T; Wechsel M; Klinghammer L; Flachskampf FA; Daniel WG; Achenbach S
    Am J Cardiol; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1561-7. PubMed ID: 19932793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Non-invasive and invasive evaluation of aortic valve area in 100 patients with severe aortic valve stenosis: comparison of cardiac computed tomography with ECHO (transesophageal/transthoracic) and catheter examination.
    Anger T; Bauer V; Plachtzik C; Geisler T; Gawaz MP; Oberhoff M; Höher M
    J Cardiol; 2014 Mar; 63(3):189-97. PubMed ID: 24060524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Aortic valve area discrepancy by Gorlin equation and Doppler echocardiography continuity equation: relationship to flow in patients with valvular aortic stenosis.
    Burwash IG; Dickinson A; Teskey RJ; Tam JW; Chan KL
    Can J Cardiol; 2000 Aug; 16(8):985-92. PubMed ID: 10978934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of aortic valve stenosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of an original semiautomated analysis of phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance with Doppler echocardiography.
    Defrance C; Bollache E; Kachenoura N; Perdrix L; Hrynchyshyn N; Bruguière E; Redheuil A; Diebold B; Mousseaux E
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Sep; 5(5):604-12. PubMed ID: 22798520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of aortic valve area combining echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Nickl W; Füth R; Smettan J; Köhler T; Lankisch M; Kramer F; Krahn T; Barroso MC; Klein RM; Dinh W
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 2012 Mar; 98(3):234-42. PubMed ID: 22370613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of ejection fraction and valvular regurgitation on the accuracy of aortic valve area determination.
    Berglund H; Kim CJ; Nishioka T; Luo H; Siegel RJ
    Echocardiography; 2001 Jan; 18(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 11182785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Invasive assessment of doubtful aortic stenosis by measuring simultaneous transaortic gradient with a pressure wire.
    Chopard R; Meneveau N; Plastaras P; Janin S; Seronde MF; Ecarnot F; Schiele F
    Am J Cardiol; 2013 Jun; 111(12):1772-7. PubMed ID: 23540549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Grading of aortic valve stenosis at 64-slice spiral computed tomography: comparison with transthoracic echocardiography and calibration against cardiac catheterization.
    Lembcke A; Woinke M; Borges AC; Dohmen PM; Lachnitt A; Westermann Y; Geigenmueller A; Hermann KG; Butler C; Thiele H; Kivelitz DE
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Jun; 44(6):360-8. PubMed ID: 19412115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Precision of forty slice spiral computed tomography for quantifying aortic valve stenosis: comparison with echocardiography and validation against cardiac catheterization.
    Lembcke A; Thiele H; Lachnitt A; Enzweiler CN; Wagner M; Hein PA; Eddicks S; Kivelitz DE
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Oct; 43(10):719-28. PubMed ID: 18791414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of the aortic valve stenosis: an in vivo and ex vivo study.
    Buchner S; Debl K; Schmid FX; Luchner A; Djavidani B
    BMC Med Imaging; 2015 Aug; 15():34. PubMed ID: 26306577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of aortic valve stenosis using a hybrid approach of Doppler echocardiography and inert gas rebreathing.
    Hamm K; Trinkmann F; Heggemann F; Gruettner J; Schmid-Bindert G; Borggrefe M; Haghi D; Saur J
    In Vivo; 2012; 26(6):1027-33. PubMed ID: 23160688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differences in aortic valve area measured with CT planimetry and echocardiography (continuity equation) are related to divergent estimates of left ventricular outflow tract area.
    Halpern EJ; Mallya R; Sewell M; Shulman M; Zwas DR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jun; 192(6):1668-73. PubMed ID: 19457833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of invasive and noninvasive assessment of aortic stenosis severity in the elderly.
    Gertz ZM; Raina A; O'Donnell W; McCauley BD; Shellenberger C; Kolansky DM; Wilensky RL; Forfia PR; Herrmann HC
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Jun; 5(3):406-14. PubMed ID: 22647520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hakki's formula for measurement of aortic valve area by magnetic resonance imaging.
    Puymirat E; Chassaing S; Trinquart L; Barbey C; Chaudeurge A; Bar O; Blanchard D
    Am J Cardiol; 2010 Jul; 106(2):249-54. PubMed ID: 20599011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantification of aortic valve stenosis: head-to-head comparison of 64-slice spiral computed tomography with transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac catheterization.
    Lembcke A; Kivelitz DE; Borges AC; Lachnitt A; Hein PA; Dohmen PM; Thiele H
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Jan; 44(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 19060789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Integration of 3D imaging data in the assessment of aortic stenosis: impact on classification of disease severity.
    O'Brien B; Schoenhagen P; Kapadia SR; Svensson LG; Rodriguez L; Griffin BP; Tuzcu EM; Desai MY
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Sep; 4(5):566-73. PubMed ID: 21737600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Noninvasive evaluation of aortic stenosis severity utilizing Doppler ultrasound and electrical bioimpedance.
    Goli VD; Teague SM; Prasad R; Harvey J; Voyles WF; Olson EG; Schechter E; Thadani U
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1988 Jan; 11(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 3335708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Planimetric and continuity equation assessment of aortic valve area: Head to head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography.
    Pouleur AC; le Polain de Waroux JB; Pasquet A; Vancraeynest D; Vanoverschelde JL; Gerber BL
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Dec; 26(6):1436-43. PubMed ID: 17968960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Aortic valve area assessment: multidetector CT compared with cine MR imaging and transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography.
    Pouleur AC; le Polain de Waroux JB; Pasquet A; Vanoverschelde JL; Gerber BL
    Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):745-54. PubMed ID: 17630357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.