BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26803258)

  • 1. The influence of visitor use levels on visitor spatial behavior in off-trail areas of dispersed recreation use.
    D'Antonio A; Monz C
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Apr; 170():79-87. PubMed ID: 26803258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of minimum impact education on visitor spatial behavior in parks and protected areas: An experimental investigation using GPS-based tracking.
    Kidd AM; Monz C; D'Antonio A; Manning RE; Reigner N; Goonan KA; Jacobi C
    J Environ Manage; 2015 Oct; 162():53-62. PubMed ID: 26225933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enhancing the utility of visitor impact assessment in parks and protected areas: a combined social-ecological approach.
    D'Antonio A; Monz C; Newman P; Lawson S; Taff D
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Jul; 124():72-81. PubMed ID: 23624424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving understanding and management of the complex relationship between visitor motivations and spatial behaviors in parks and protected areas.
    Sisneros-Kidd AM; D'Antonio A; Monz C; Mitrovich M
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Feb; 280():111841. PubMed ID: 33370670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. More than A to B: Understanding and managing visitor spatial behaviour in urban forests using public participation GIS.
    Korpilo S; Virtanen T; Saukkonen T; Lehvävirta S
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Feb; 207():124-133. PubMed ID: 29156435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The nature of the pandemic: Exploring the negative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic upon recreation visitor behaviors and experiences in parks and protected areas.
    Ferguson MD; Lynch ML; Evensen D; Ferguson LA; Barcelona R; Giles G; Leberman M
    J Outdoor Recreat Tour; 2023 Mar; 41():100498. PubMed ID: 37521260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of local ecological knowledge, minimum-impact knowledge, and prior experience on visitor perceptions of the ecological impacts of backcountry recreation.
    D'Antonio A; Monz C; Newman P; Lawson S; Taff D
    Environ Manage; 2012 Oct; 50(4):542-54. PubMed ID: 22814546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatially characterizing visitor use and its association with informal trails in Yosemite Valley meadows.
    Walden-Schreiner C; Leung YF
    Environ Manage; 2013 Jul; 52(1):163-78. PubMed ID: 23689790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Desktop analysis of potential impacts of visitor use: a case study for the highest park in the Southern Hemisphere.
    Barros A; Pickering C; Gudes O
    J Environ Manage; 2015 Mar; 150():179-195. PubMed ID: 25500135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Toward the improvement of trail classification in national parks using the recreation opportunity spectrum approach.
    Oishi Y
    Environ Manage; 2013 Jun; 51(6):1126-36. PubMed ID: 23615956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How Networks of Informal Trails Cause Landscape Level Damage to Vegetation.
    Barros A; Marina Pickering C
    Environ Manage; 2017 Jul; 60(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 28412764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using crowd-sourced photos to assess seasonal patterns of visitor use in mountain-protected areas.
    Walden-Schreiner C; Rossi SD; Barros A; Pickering C; Leung YF
    Ambio; 2018 Nov; 47(7):781-793. PubMed ID: 29435731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rapid Resource Change and Visitor-Use Management: Social-ecological Connections at the Bonneville Salt Flats.
    Zajchowski CAB; Brownlee MTJ; Blacketer MP; Peterson BA; Craft K; Bowen BB
    Environ Manage; 2020 Aug; 66(2):263-277. PubMed ID: 32564214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Understanding and managing experiential aspects of soundscapes at Muir woods national monument.
    Pilcher EJ; Newman P; Manning RE
    Environ Manage; 2009 Mar; 43(3):425-35. PubMed ID: 19020928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The efficacy of combined educational and site management actions in reducing off-trail hiking in an urban-proximate protected area.
    Hockett KS; Marion JL; Leung YF
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Dec; 203(Pt 1):17-28. PubMed ID: 28778002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An interpretive study of Yosemite National Park visitors' perspectives toward alternative transportation in Yosemite Valley.
    White DD
    Environ Manage; 2007 Jan; 39(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 17106793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visitor Preferences for Visual Changes in Bark Beetle-Impacted Forest Recreation Settings in the United States and Germany.
    Arnberger A; Ebenberger M; Schneider IE; Cottrell S; Schlueter AC; von Ruschkowski E; Venette RC; Snyder SA; Gobster PH
    Environ Manage; 2018 Feb; 61(2):209-223. PubMed ID: 29273996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The digitalization of outdoor recreation: Global perspectives on the opportunities and challenges for protected area management.
    Mangold M; Schwietering A; Zink J; Steinbauer MJ; Heurich M
    J Environ Manage; 2024 Feb; 352():120108. PubMed ID: 38244406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visitor impacts on trails in the Sagarmatha (Mt. Everest) National Park, Nepal.
    Nepal SK; Nepal SA
    Ambio; 2004 Aug; 33(6):334-40. PubMed ID: 15387069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reducing visitor noise levels at Muir Woods National Monument using experimental management.
    Stack DW; Peter N; Manning RE; Fristrup KM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Mar; 129(3):1375-80. PubMed ID: 21428501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.