These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26804489)

  • 61. Surgical outcomes after laparoscopic or robotic liver resection in hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity-score matched analysis with conventional open liver resection.
    Han DH; Choi SH; Park EJ; Kang DR; Choi GH; Choi JS
    Int J Med Robot; 2016 Dec; 12(4):735-742. PubMed ID: 26537176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. The laparoscopic pyeloplasty: is there a role in the age of robotics?
    Reddy MN; Nerli RB
    Urol Clin North Am; 2015 Feb; 42(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 25455171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Same-day discharge is feasible and safe in patients undergoing minimally invasive staging for gynecologic malignancies.
    Penner KR; Fleming ND; Barlavi L; Axtell AE; Lentz SE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):186.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25132462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. A new vaginal extractor for laparoscopic surgery.
    Spuhler SC; Sauthier PG; Chardonnens EG; De Grandi P
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1994 Aug; 1(4 Pt 1):401-4. PubMed ID: 9138883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Safety, feasibility and learning curve of robotic single-site surgery in gynecology.
    El Hachem L; Momeni M; Friedman K; Moshier EL; Chuang LT; Gretz HF
    Int J Med Robot; 2016 Sep; 12(3):509-16. PubMed ID: 26096813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Robotic arm enhancement to accommodate improved efficiency and decreased resource utilization in complex minimally invasive surgical procedures.
    Geis WP; Kim HC; Brennan EJ; McAfee PC; Wang Y
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1996; 29():471-81. PubMed ID: 10172847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Laparoscopic surgery in middle- and low-income countries: gasless lift laparoscopic surgery.
    Gnanaraj J; Rhodes M
    Surg Endosc; 2016 May; 30(5):2151-4. PubMed ID: 26275541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Hand-held robotic instrument for dextrous laparoscopic interventions.
    Piccigallo M; Focacci F; Tonet O; Megali G; Quaglia C; Dario P
    Int J Med Robot; 2008 Dec; 4(4):331-8. PubMed ID: 18803339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Single-port approach to benign gynecologic pathology. A review.
    Carbonnel M; Revaux A; Frydman R; Yazigi A; Ayoubi JM
    Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Jun; 67(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 25714874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Force sensor for laparoscopic Babcock.
    Morimoto AK; Foral RD; Kuhlman JL; Zucker KA; Curet MJ; Bocklage T; MacFarlane TI; Kory L
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1997; 39():354-61. PubMed ID: 10173062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. The optimal mechanical efficiency of laparoscopic forceps.
    Heijnsdijk EA; Pasdeloup A; Dankelman J; Gouma DJ
    Surg Endosc; 2004 Dec; 18(12):1766-70. PubMed ID: 15809786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Robot-assisted laparoscopic (RAL) procedures in general surgery.
    Alimoglu O; Sagiroglu J; Atak I; Kilic A; Eren T; Caliskan M; Bas G
    Int J Med Robot; 2016 Sep; 12(3):427-30. PubMed ID: 26443708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Prostatectomy for benign prostate disease: open, laparoscopic and robotic techniques.
    Ferretti M; Phillips J
    Can J Urol; 2015 Oct; 22 Suppl 1():60-6. PubMed ID: 26497345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Pancreatic cancer: Open or minimally invasive surgery?
    Zhang YH; Zhang CW; Hu ZM; Hong DF
    World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Aug; 22(32):7301-10. PubMed ID: 27621576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Robotic single-site myomectomy: initial report and technique.
    Lewis EI; Srouji SS; Gargiulo AR
    Fertil Steril; 2015 May; 103(5):1370-7.e1. PubMed ID: 25792248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Real-Time Measurement of the Tool-Tissue Interaction in Minimally Invasive Abdominal Surgery: The First Step to Developing the Next Generation of Smart Laparoscopic Instruments.
    Barrie J; Jayne DG; Neville A; Hunter L; Hood AJ; Culmer PR
    Surg Innov; 2016 Oct; 23(5):463-8. PubMed ID: 27122481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Automated instrument tracking in robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery.
    Uecker DR; Lee C; Wang YF; Wang Y
    J Image Guid Surg; 1995; 1(6):308-25. PubMed ID: 9080352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Endourology, the initiative.
    Jeon SH
    Korean J Urol; 2015 Mar; 56(3):169. PubMed ID: 25763119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. The influence of body mass index on clinical short-term outcomes in robotic colorectal surgery.
    Lagares-Garcia J; O'Connell A; Firilas A; Robinson CC; Dumas BP; Hagen ME
    Int J Med Robot; 2016 Dec; 12(4):680-685. PubMed ID: 26314561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection: is there any real difference? A comparative single center study.
    Ielpo B; Caruso R; Quijano Y; Duran H; Diaz E; Fabra I; Oliva C; Olivares S; Ferri V; Ceron R; Plaza C; Vicente E
    Int J Med Robot; 2014 Sep; 10(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 24692203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.