238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26805987)
1. Implementation of genomic recursions in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor for US Holsteins with a large number of genotyped animals.
Masuda Y; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Legarra A; Aguilar I; Lourenco DAL; Fragomeni BO; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2016 Mar; 99(3):1968-1974. PubMed ID: 26805987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differing genetic trend estimates from traditional and genomic evaluations of genotyped animals as evidence of preselection bias in US Holsteins.
Masuda Y; VanRaden PM; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jun; 101(6):5194-5206. PubMed ID: 29573806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hot topic: Use of genomic recursions in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) with a large number of genotypes.
Fragomeni BO; Lourenco DA; Tsuruta S; Masuda Y; Aguilar I; Legarra A; Lawlor TJ; Misztal I
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jun; 98(6):4090-4. PubMed ID: 25864050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multibreed genomic evaluation for production traits of dairy cattle in the United States using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor.
Cesarani A; Lourenco D; Tsuruta S; Legarra A; Nicolazzi EL; VanRaden PM; Misztal I
J Dairy Sci; 2022 Jun; 105(6):5141-5152. PubMed ID: 35282922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genetic evaluation using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in American Angus.
Lourenco DA; Tsuruta S; Fragomeni BO; Masuda Y; Aguilar I; Legarra A; Bertrand JK; Amen TS; Wang L; Moser DW; Misztal I
J Anim Sci; 2015 Jun; 93(6):2653-62. PubMed ID: 26115253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Are evaluations on young genotyped animals benefiting from the past generations?
Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Aguilar I; Lawlor TJ; Forni S; Weller JI
J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(6):3930-42. PubMed ID: 24679931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of genomic predictions for lowly heritable traits using multi-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in Holstein cattle.
Guarini AR; Lourenco DAL; Brito LF; Sargolzaei M; Baes CF; Miglior F; Misztal I; Schenkel FS
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Sep; 101(9):8076-8086. PubMed ID: 29935829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is single-step genomic REML with the algorithm for proven and young more computationally efficient when less generations of data are present?
Junqueira VS; Lourenco D; Masuda Y; Cardoso FF; Lopes PS; Silva FFE; Misztal I
J Anim Sci; 2022 May; 100(5):. PubMed ID: 35289906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genomic predictions for yield traits in US Holsteins with unknown parent groups.
Cesarani A; Masuda Y; Tsuruta S; Nicolazzi EL; VanRaden PM; Lourenco D; Misztal I
J Dairy Sci; 2021 May; 104(5):5843-5853. PubMed ID: 33663836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application of single-step single nucleotide polymorphism best linear unbiased predictor model with unknown-parent groups for type traits in Japanese Holsteins.
Osawa T; Masuda Y; Saburi J; Hirumachi K
J Dairy Sci; 2023 Jul; 106(7):4847-4859. PubMed ID: 37268563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Including overseas performance information in genomic evaluations of Australian dairy cattle.
Haile-Mariam M; Pryce JE; Schrooten C; Hayes BJ
J Dairy Sci; 2015 May; 98(5):3443-59. PubMed ID: 25771052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of genomic recursions and algorithm for proven and young animals for single-step genomic BLUP analyses--a simulation study.
Fragomeni BO; Lourenco DA; Tsuruta S; Masuda Y; Aguilar I; Misztal I
J Anim Breed Genet; 2015 Oct; 132(5):340-5. PubMed ID: 25857518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using recursion to compute the inverse of the genomic relationship matrix.
Misztal I; Legarra A; Aguilar I
J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(6):3943-52. PubMed ID: 24679933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Including different groups of genotyped females for genomic prediction in a Nordic Jersey population.
Gao H; Madsen P; Nielsen US; Aamand GP; Su G; Byskov K; Jensen J
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Dec; 98(12):9051-9. PubMed ID: 26433419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Autoregressive single-step test-day model for genomic evaluations of Portuguese Holstein cattle.
Silva AA; Silva DA; Silva FF; Costa CN; Lopes PS; Caetano AR; Thompson G; Carvalheira J
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Jul; 102(7):6330-6339. PubMed ID: 31056320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficient approximation of reliabilities for single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor models with the Algorithm for Proven and Young.
Bermann M; Lourenco D; Misztal I
J Anim Sci; 2022 Jan; 100(1):. PubMed ID: 34877603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of genotyped cows in the reference population on the genomic evaluation of Holstein cattle.
Uemoto Y; Osawa T; Saburi J
Animal; 2017 Mar; 11(3):382-393. PubMed ID: 27515004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of a single-step with a multistep single nucleotide polymorphism best linear unbiased predictor model for genomic evaluation of conformation traits in German Holsteins.
Alkhoder H; Liu Z; Segelke D; Reents R
J Dairy Sci; 2022 Apr; 105(4):3306-3322. PubMed ID: 35181130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genomic prediction of residual feed intake in US Holstein dairy cattle.
Li B; VanRaden PM; Guduk E; O'Connell JR; Null DJ; Connor EE; VandeHaar MJ; Tempelman RJ; Weigel KA; Cole JB
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Mar; 103(3):2477-2486. PubMed ID: 31954583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inexpensive Computation of the Inverse of the Genomic Relationship Matrix in Populations with Small Effective Population Size.
Misztal I
Genetics; 2016 Feb; 202(2):401-9. PubMed ID: 26584903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
