103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2680618)
1. Validity of the Bioself 110 fertility indicator.
Labrecque M; Drouin J; Rioux JE; Gingras S; Spieler JM
Fertil Steril; 1989 Oct; 52(4):604-8. PubMed ID: 2680618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An evaluation of the BIOSELF 110 fertility indicator.
Ismail M; Arshat H; Pulcrano J; Royston P; Spieler J
Contraception; 1989 Jan; 39(1):53-71. PubMed ID: 2642781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An evaluation of the Bioself 110 electronic fertility indicator as a contraceptive aid.
Flynn A; Pulcrano J; Royston P; Spieler J
Contraception; 1991 Aug; 44(2):125-39. PubMed ID: 1893707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contraceptive application of the Bioself fertility indicator.
Drouin J; Guilbert EE; Désaulniers G
Contraception; 1994 Sep; 50(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 7805373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The CUE Fertility Monitor compared to ultrasound and LH peak measurements for fertile time ovulation detection.
Freundl G; Bremme M; Frank-Herrmann P; Baur S; Godehardt E; Sottong U
Adv Contracept; 1996 Jun; 12(2):111-21. PubMed ID: 8863906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Salivary LH as an ovulation indicator: on the value of autopalpation of the cervix uteri for the detection of fertile and infertile days of the cycle].
Loewit K; Wolfram G; Ortlieb A; Widhalm R
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1987 Nov; 47(11):803-7. PubMed ID: 3692114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inaccuracy of basal body temperature charts in predicting urinary luteinizing hormone surges.
Quagliarello J; Arny M
Fertil Steril; 1986 Mar; 45(3):334-7. PubMed ID: 3949032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of the ovulation method with the CUE ovulation predictor in determining the fertile period.
Fehring RJ
J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 1996 Oct; 8(10):461-6. PubMed ID: 9305046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Personal hormone monitoring for contraception.
Bonnar J; Flynn A; Freundl G; Kirkman R; Royston R; Snowden R
Br J Fam Plann; 1999 Jan; 24(4):128-34. PubMed ID: 10023097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimated maximum failure rates of cycle monitors using daily conception probabilities in the menstrual cycle.
Freundl G; Godehardt E; Kern PA; Frank-Herrmann P; Koubenec HJ; Gnoth Ch
Hum Reprod; 2003 Dec; 18(12):2628-33. PubMed ID: 14645183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Monitoring techniques to predict and detect ovulation.
Vermesh M; Kletzky OA; Davajan V; Israel R
Fertil Steril; 1987 Feb; 47(2):259-64. PubMed ID: 3817171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction of ovulation by urinary hormone measurements with the home use ClearPlan Fertility Monitor: comparison with transvaginal ultrasound scans and serum hormone measurements.
Behre HM; Kuhlage J; Gassner C; Sonntag B; Schem C; Schneider HP; Nieschlag E
Hum Reprod; 2000 Dec; 15(12):2478-82. PubMed ID: 11098014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variability in the hormonally estimated fertile phase of the menstrual cycle.
Fehring RJ; Schneider M
Fertil Steril; 2008 Oct; 90(4):1232-5. PubMed ID: 18249381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of perception of ovulation day in women trying to conceive.
Zinaman M; Johnson S; Ellis J; Ledger W
Curr Med Res Opin; 2012 May; 28(5):749-54. PubMed ID: 22462529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Early luteal phase treatment with mifepristone (RU 486) for fertility regulation.
Gemzell-Danielsson K; Swahn ML; Svalander P; Bygdeman M
Hum Reprod; 1993 Jun; 8(6):870-3. PubMed ID: 8345076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Standardized protocols for characterizing women's fertility: A data-driven approach.
Blake KR; Dixson BJ; O'Dean SM; Denson TF
Horm Behav; 2016 May; 81():74-83. PubMed ID: 27072982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the OvuSTICK urinary luteinizing hormone kit in normal and stimulated menstrual cycles.
Elkind-Hirsch K; Goldzieher JW; Gibbons WE; Besch PK
Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Mar; 67(3):450-3. PubMed ID: 3511422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Variability in the phases of the menstrual cycle.
Fehring RJ; Schneider M; Raviele K
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2006; 35(3):376-84. PubMed ID: 16700687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The risks of the natural family planning methods].
Zufferey MM
Ther Umsch; 1986 May; 43(5):417-24. PubMed ID: 3726778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Identification and prediction of the fertile window with a new web-based medical device using a vaginal biosensor for measuring the circadian and circamensual core body temperature.
Regidor PA; Kaczmarczyk M; Schiweck E; Goeckenjan-Festag M; Alexander H
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2018 Mar; 34(3):256-260. PubMed ID: 29082805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
