BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26807637)

  • 1. Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator in Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy: A Pilot Study.
    Hao M; Wang Z; Wei F; Wang J; Wang W; Ping Y
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):594-9. PubMed ID: 26807637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Feasibility of unilateral or bilateral nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer and evaluation of the post-surgery recovery of the bladder and rectal function].
    Zhu T; Yu AJ; Shou HF; Chen X; Zhu JQ; Yang ZY; Zhang P; Gao YL
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Jan; 33(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 21575466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robot-assisted total preservation of the pelvic autonomic nerve with extended systematic lymphadenectomy as part of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
    Lee YS; Chong GO; Lee YH; Hong DG; Cho YL; Park IS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jul; 23(6):1133-8. PubMed ID: 23792607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robot versus laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a comparison of the intraoperative and perioperative results of a single surgeon's initial experience.
    Chong GO; Lee YH; Hong DG; Cho YL; Park IS; Lee YS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jul; 23(6):1145-9. PubMed ID: 23748178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Success Factors of Laparoscopic Nerve-sparing Radical Hysterectomy for Preserving Bladder Function in Patients with Cervical Cancer: A Protocol-Based Prospective Cohort Study.
    Kim HS; Kim TH; Suh DH; Kim SY; Kim MA; Jeong CW; Hong KS; Song YS
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015; 22(6):1987-95. PubMed ID: 25465377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Favorable factors for preserving bladder function after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: A protocol-based validation study.
    Kim HS; Kim M; Luo Y; Lee M; Song YS;
    J Surg Oncol; 2017 Sep; 116(4):492-499. PubMed ID: 28695641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nerve-sparing versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a minimum 12 months' follow-up study.
    Bogani G; Cromi A; Uccella S; Serati M; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Nardelli F; Ghezzi F
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 May; 24(4):787-93. PubMed ID: 24552894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Class III nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy versus standard class III radical hysterectomy: an observational study.
    Ditto A; Martinelli F; Mattana F; Reato C; Solima E; Carcangiu M; Haeusler E; Mariani L; Raspagliesi F
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Nov; 18(12):3469-78. PubMed ID: 21556949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preservation of autonomic nerves in laparoscopic total radical hysterectomy.
    Puntambekar SP; Patil A; Joshi SN; Rayate NV; Puntambekar SS; Agarwal GA
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2010 Dec; 20(10):813-9. PubMed ID: 21091224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Oncologic results and surgical morbidity of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the treatment of FIGO stage IB cervical cancer: long-term follow-up.
    Park NY; Chong GO; Hong DG; Cho YL; Park IS; Lee YS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Feb; 21(2):355-62. PubMed ID: 21270616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surgical, Urinary, and Survival Outcomes of Nerve-sparing Versus Traditional Radical Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study in China.
    Li L; Ma S; Tan X; Zhong S; Wu M
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2019 Oct; 42(10):783-788. PubMed ID: 31490195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Laparoscopic anatomical nerve sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a clinical analysis of 37 cases].
    Chen Y; Li Y; Xu HC; Li JN; Li YY; Liang ZQ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 May; 44(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 19573312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical parametrectomy for occult early-stage invasive cervical cancer after simple hysterectomy.
    Li J; Xu H; Chen Y; Wang D; Li Y; Liang Z
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Oct; 22(8):1383-8. PubMed ID: 22964523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Carcinoma: Emphasis on Nerve Content in Removed Cardinal Ligaments.
    Shi R; Wei W; Jiang P
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Jan; 26(1):192-8. PubMed ID: 26569055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nerve-sparing radical abdominal trachelectomy versus nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in early-stage (FIGO IA2-IB) cervical cancer: a comparative study on feasibility and outcome.
    van Gent MD; van den Haak LW; Gaarenstroom KN; Peters AA; van Poelgeest MI; Trimbos JB; de Kroon CD
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 May; 24(4):735-43. PubMed ID: 24651626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy without uterine manipulator for cervical cancer stage IB: description of the technique, our experience and results after the era of LACC trial.
    Kavallaris A; Chalvatzas N; Gkoutzioulis A; Zygouris D
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Apr; 303(4):1039-1047. PubMed ID: 33068159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Laparoscopic type C1 hysterectomy based on the anatomic landmark of the uterus deep vein and its branches for cervical cancer].
    Liang MR; Han DX; Jiang W; Liu H; Li L; Zhong ML; Luo L; Zeng SY
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Apr; 40(4):288-294. PubMed ID: 29730917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy and oncologic safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
    Roh JW; Lee DO; Suh DH; Lim MC; Seo SS; Chung J; Lee S; Park SY
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Apr; 26(2):90-9. PubMed ID: 25872890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A prospective study on nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer].
    Li B; Zhang R; Wu LY; Zhang GY; Li X; Yu GZ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 43(8):606-10. PubMed ID: 19087497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surgical and Oncological Outcome of Robotic Surgery Compared With Laparoscopic and Abdominal Surgery in the Management of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
    Corrado G; Cutillo G; Saltari M; Mancini E; Sindico S; Vici P; Sergi D; Sperduti I; Patrizi L; Pomati G; Baiocco E; Vizza E
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):539-46. PubMed ID: 26825826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.