These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26807772)

  • 1. Failure modes of Y-TZP abutments with external hex implant-abutment connection determined by fractographic analysis.
    Basílio MA; Delben JA; Cesar PF; Rizkalla AS; Santos Junior GC; Arioli Filho JN
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Jul; 60():187-194. PubMed ID: 26807772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of aging and porcelain sintering on rotational freedom of internal-hex one-piece zirconia abutments.
    Prisco R; Santagata M; Vigolo P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(4):1003-8. PubMed ID: 23869358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of artificial aging conditions on yttria-stabilized zirconia implant abutments.
    Basílio Mde A; Cardoso KV; Antonio SG; Rizkalla AS; Santos Junior GC; Arioli Filho JN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):277-85. PubMed ID: 26996934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
    Foong JK; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Swain MV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.
    Mühlemann S; Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 23735182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.
    Larsson C
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fracture loads and failure modes of customized and non-customized zirconia abutments.
    Moris ICM; Chen YC; Faria ACL; Ribeiro RF; Fok AS; Rodrigues RCS
    Dent Mater; 2018 Aug; 34(8):e197-e204. PubMed ID: 29739624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fracture strength of yttria-stabilized zirconium-dioxide (Y-TZP) fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) with different abutment core thicknesses and connector dimensions.
    Ambré MJ; Aschan F; Vult von Steyern P
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):377-82. PubMed ID: 23289522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of the Titanium Base Abutment Design on Monolithic Zirconia Multiple-Unit Implant Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Laboratory Study.
    Calderon U; Hicklin SP; Mojon P; Fehmer V; Nesic D; Mekki M; Sailer I
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 35235616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment with a commercially fabricated CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutment.
    Protopapadaki M; Monaco EA; Kim HI; Davis EL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 24011801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of fatigue resistance and failure modes between metal-ceramic and all-ceramic crowns by cyclic loading in water.
    Nicolaisen MH; Bahrami G; Finlay S; Isidor F
    J Dent; 2014 Dec; 42(12):1613-20. PubMed ID: 25174946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fractographic analyses of failed one-piece zirconia implant restorations.
    Øilo M; Arola D
    Dent Mater; 2018 Jun; 34(6):922-931. PubMed ID: 29673708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load.
    Kim JS; Raigrodski AJ; Flinn BD; Rubenstein JE; Chung KH; Mancl LA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23566607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal discrepancy of monolithic and veneered all-ceramic crowns on titanium and zirconia implant abutments before and after adhesive cementation: a scanning electron microscopy analysis.
    Martinez-Rus F; Ferreiroa A; Ozcan M; Pradies G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):480-7. PubMed ID: 23527350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Zirconia implant abutment fracture: clinical case reports and precautions for use.
    Aboushelib MN; Salameh Z
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(6):616-9. PubMed ID: 19918599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Zirconium dioxide implant abutments for posterior single-tooth replacement: first results.
    Nothdurft FP; Pospiech PR
    J Periodontol; 2009 Dec; 80(12):2065-72. PubMed ID: 19961390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fracture resistance of crowns cemented on titanium and zirconia implant abutments: a comparison of monolithic versus manually veneered all-ceramic systems.
    Martínez-Rus F; Ferreiroa A; Özcan M; Bartolomé JF; Pradíes G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1448-55. PubMed ID: 23189296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro fatigue and fracture resistance of one- and two-piece CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutments.
    Gehrke P; Johannson D; Fischer C; Stawarczyk B; Beuer F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(3):546-54. PubMed ID: 26009905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of fatigue loading on the fracture strength and failure mode of lithium disilicate and zirconia implant abutments.
    Elsayed A; Wille S; Al-Akhali M; Kern M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jan; 29(1):20-27. PubMed ID: 28664585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An in vitro comparison of fracture load of zirconia custom abutments with internal connection and different angulations and thickness: part I.
    Albosefi A; Finkelman M; Zandparsa R
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jun; 23(4):296-301. PubMed ID: 24417713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.