271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26808394)
1. Temporal trends and variability of colonoscopy performance in a gastroenterology practice.
le Clercq CM; Mooi RJ; Winkens B; Salden BN; Bakker CM; van Nunen AB; Keulen EP; de Ridder RJ; Masclee AA; Sanduleanu S
Endoscopy; 2016 Mar; 48(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 26808394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Endoscopist characteristics that influence the quality of colonoscopy.
Jover R; Zapater P; Bujanda L; Hernández V; Cubiella J; Pellisé M; Ponce M; Ono A; Lanas A; Seoane A; Marín-Gabriel JC; Chaparro M; Cacho G; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Fernández-Díez S; Peris A; Nicolás-Pérez D; Murcia O; Castells A; Quintero E;
Endoscopy; 2016 Mar; 48(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 26845473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Longitudinal assessment of colonoscopy quality indicators: a report from the Gastroenterology Practice Management Group.
Hernandez LV; Deas TM; Catalano MF; Guda NM; Huang L; Ketover SR; Etzkorn KP; Gutta KG; Morris SJ; Schmalz MJ; Klyve D; Allen JI
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Nov; 80(5):835-41. PubMed ID: 24818549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality indicators for screening colonoscopy and colonoscopist performance and the subsequent risk of interval colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
Lund M; Trads M; Njor SH; Erichsen R; Andersen B
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2019 Nov; 17(11):2265-2300. PubMed ID: 31188154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Trends in quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria.
Waldmann E; Gessl I; Sallinger D; Jeschek P; Britto-Arias M; Heinze G; Fasching E; Weiss W; Gschwantler M; Trauner M; Ferlitsch M
Endoscopy; 2016 Dec; 48(12):1102-1109. PubMed ID: 27576182
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of exclusion criteria on a physician's adenoma detection rate.
Marcondes FO; Dean KM; Schoen RE; Leffler DA; Rose S; Morris M; Mehrotra A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Oct; 82(4):668-75. PubMed ID: 26385275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Colonoscopy quality measures: experience from the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.
Lee TJ; Rutter MD; Blanks RG; Moss SM; Goddard AF; Chilton A; Nickerson C; McNally RJ; Patnick J; Rees CJ
Gut; 2012 Jul; 61(7):1050-7. PubMed ID: 21940723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures.
Kahi CJ; Ballard D; Shah AS; Mears R; Johnson CS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):925-31. PubMed ID: 23472996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adenoma detection rate varies greatly during colonoscopy training.
van Doorn SC; Klanderman RB; Hazewinkel Y; Fockens P; Dekker E
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Jul; 82(1):122-9. PubMed ID: 25817896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Advanced adenoma detection rate is independent of nonadvanced adenoma detection rate.
Greenspan M; Rajan KB; Baig A; Beck T; Mobarhan S; Melson J
Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Aug; 108(8):1286-92. PubMed ID: 23711625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The performance indicator of colonic intubation (PICI) in a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program.
Lund M; Erichsen R; Njor SH; Laurberg S; Valori R; Andersen B
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Sep; 54(9):1176-1181. PubMed ID: 31498716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation between adenoma detection rate and novel quality indicators for screening colonoscopy. A proposal for quality measures tool kit.
Abdelfatah MM; Elhanafi S; Zuckerman MJ; Othman MO
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2017 Oct; 52(10):1148-1157. PubMed ID: 28643529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Calculating the adenoma detection rate in screening colonoscopies only: Is it necessary? Can it be gamed?
Rex DK; Ponugoti PL
Endoscopy; 2017 Nov; 49(11):1069-1074. PubMed ID: 28753699
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Public reporting of colonoscopy quality is associated with an increase in endoscopist adenoma detection rate.
Abdul-Baki H; Schoen RE; Dean K; Rose S; Leffler DA; Kuganeswaran E; Morris M; Carrell D; Mehrotra A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Oct; 82(4):676-82. PubMed ID: 26385276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Data quality and colonoscopy performance indicators in the prevalent round of a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program.
Lund M; Erichsen R; Valori R; Møller Jensen T; Helle Njor S; Laurberg S; Andersen B;
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr; 54(4):471-477. PubMed ID: 30978128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Morning colonoscopies are associated with improved adenoma detection rates.
Teng TY; Khor SN; Kailasam M; Cheah WK; Lau CC
Surg Endosc; 2016 May; 30(5):1796-803. PubMed ID: 26198158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria is not dependent on endoscopist specialty or setting.
Kozbial K; Reinhart K; Heinze G; Zwatz C; Bannert C; Salzl P; Waldmann E; Britto-Arias M; Ferlitsch A; Trauner M; Weiss W; Ferlitsch M
Endoscopy; 2015 Mar; 47(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 25412094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of Colonoscopy Volume on Quality Indicators.
Pace D; Borgaonkar M; Lougheed M; Marcoux C; Evans B; Hickey N; O'Leary M; Boone D; McGrath J
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016; 2016():2580894. PubMed ID: 27446831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monitoring colonoscopy withdrawal time significantly improves the adenoma detection rate and the performance of endoscopists.
Vavricka SR; Sulz MC; Degen L; Rechner R; Manz M; Biedermann L; Beglinger C; Peter S; Safroneeva E; Rogler G; Schoepfer AM
Endoscopy; 2016 Mar; 48(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 26808396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Identification of physicians with unusual performance in screening colonoscopy databases: a Bayesian approach.
Stock C; Uhlmann L; Hoffmeister M; Laux G; Kieser M; Brenner H
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Mar; 81(3):646-654.e1. PubMed ID: 25523387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
