330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26808396)
1. Monitoring colonoscopy withdrawal time significantly improves the adenoma detection rate and the performance of endoscopists.
Vavricka SR; Sulz MC; Degen L; Rechner R; Manz M; Biedermann L; Beglinger C; Peter S; Safroneeva E; Rogler G; Schoepfer AM
Endoscopy; 2016 Mar; 48(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 26808396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Morning colonoscopies are associated with improved adenoma detection rates.
Teng TY; Khor SN; Kailasam M; Cheah WK; Lau CC
Surg Endosc; 2016 May; 30(5):1796-803. PubMed ID: 26198158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Endoscopist characteristics that influence the quality of colonoscopy.
Jover R; Zapater P; Bujanda L; Hernández V; Cubiella J; Pellisé M; Ponce M; Ono A; Lanas A; Seoane A; Marín-Gabriel JC; Chaparro M; Cacho G; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Fernández-Díez S; Peris A; Nicolás-Pérez D; Murcia O; Castells A; Quintero E;
Endoscopy; 2016 Mar; 48(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 26845473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates (with videos).
Lee RH; Tang RS; Muthusamy VR; Ho SB; Shah NK; Wetzel L; Bain AS; Mackintosh EE; Paek AM; Crissien AM; Saraf LJ; Kalmaz DM; Savides TJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Jul; 74(1):128-34. PubMed ID: 21531410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Longer Withdrawal Time Is Associated With a Reduced Incidence of Interval Cancer After Screening Colonoscopy.
Shaukat A; Rector TS; Church TR; Lederle FA; Kim AS; Rank JM; Allen JI
Gastroenterology; 2015 Oct; 149(4):952-7. PubMed ID: 26164494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy.
Barclay RL; Vicari JJ; Doughty AS; Johanson JF; Greenlaw RL
N Engl J Med; 2006 Dec; 355(24):2533-41. PubMed ID: 17167136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Physician report cards and implementing standards of practice are both significantly associated with improved screening colonoscopy quality.
Keswani RN; Yadlapati R; Gleason KM; Ciolino JD; Manka M; O'Leary KJ; Barnard C; Pandolfino JE
Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Aug; 110(8):1134-9. PubMed ID: 25869388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association of Adenoma and Proximal Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates With Endoscopist Characteristics.
Sarvepalli S; Garber A; Rothberg MB; Mankaney G; McMichael J; Morris-Stiff G; Vargo JJ; Rizk MK; Burke CA
JAMA Surg; 2019 Jul; 154(7):627-635. PubMed ID: 30994911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Longer mean colonoscopy withdrawal time is associated with increased adenoma detection: evidence from the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England.
Lee TJ; Blanks RG; Rees CJ; Wright KC; Nickerson C; Moss SM; Chilton A; Goddard AF; Patnick J; McNally RJ; Rutter MD
Endoscopy; 2013; 45(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 23254403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endoscopist Fatigue May Contribute to a Decline in the Effectiveness of Screening Colonoscopy.
Lee CK; Cha JM; Kim WJ
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2015 Jul; 49(6):e51-6. PubMed ID: 25110871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adenoma detection rate influences the risk of metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia in low-risk patients.
Kim TJ; Kim ER; Hong SN; Kim YH; Baek SY; Ahn S; Chang DK
Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Mar; 87(3):809-817.e1. PubMed ID: 28987544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modifiable endoscopic factors that influence the adenoma detection rate in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies.
Jover R; Zapater P; Polanía E; Bujanda L; Lanas A; Hermo JA; Cubiella J; Ono A; González-Méndez Y; Peris A; Pellisé M; Seoane A; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Ponce M; Marín-Gabriel JC; Chaparro M; Cacho G; Fernández-Díez S; Arenas J; Sopeña F; de-Castro L; Vega-Villaamil P; Rodríguez-Soler M; Carballo F; Salas D; Morillas JD; Andreu M; Quintero E; Castells A;
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):381-389.e1. PubMed ID: 23218945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The 'ins and outs' of colonoscopy at Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre, South Africa: A practice audit of the outpatient endoscopy unit.
Bouter C; Barrow P; Bizos D; Bobat B; Devar J; Harran N; Joseph C; Mahomed A; Oettle J; Ramos J; Seabi M; Kgabage G; Gaylard P; Surridge D; Etheredge H; Fabian J; Lutrin D; Karlsson K
S Afr Med J; 2020 Nov; 110(12):1186-1190. PubMed ID: 33403963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Increased Rate of Adenoma Detection Associates With Reduced Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death.
Kaminski MF; Wieszczy P; Rupinski M; Wojciechowska U; Didkowska J; Kraszewska E; Kobiela J; Franczyk R; Rupinska M; Kocot B; Chaber-Ciopinska A; Pachlewski J; Polkowski M; Regula J
Gastroenterology; 2017 Jul; 153(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 28428142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing adenoma detection rate in colonoscopy using water exchange, water immersion, and air insufflation.
Hsieh YH; Tseng CW; Hu CT; Koo M; Leung FW
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jul; 86(1):192-201. PubMed ID: 27988288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria is not dependent on endoscopist specialty or setting.
Kozbial K; Reinhart K; Heinze G; Zwatz C; Bannert C; Salzl P; Waldmann E; Britto-Arias M; Ferlitsch A; Trauner M; Weiss W; Ferlitsch M
Endoscopy; 2015 Mar; 47(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 25412094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adenoma and advanced neoplasia detection rates increase from 45 years of age.
Karsenti D; Tharsis G; Burtin P; Venezia F; Tordjman G; Gillet A; Samama J; Nahon-Uzan K; Cattan P; Cavicchi M
World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jan; 25(4):447-456. PubMed ID: 30700941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Temporal trends and variability of colonoscopy performance in a gastroenterology practice.
le Clercq CM; Mooi RJ; Winkens B; Salden BN; Bakker CM; van Nunen AB; Keulen EP; de Ridder RJ; Masclee AA; Sanduleanu S
Endoscopy; 2016 Mar; 48(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 26808394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relationship between the endoscopic withdrawal time and adenoma/polyp detection rate in individual colonic segments: a KASID multicenter study.
Jung Y; Joo YE; Kim HG; Jeon SR; Cha JM; Yang HJ; Kim JW; Lee J; Kim KO; Song HK; Hwangbo Y; Shin JE
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):523-530. PubMed ID: 30267654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of video recording colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates.
Madhoun MF; Tierney WM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 21963062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
