These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. A Bayesian sensitivity study of risk difference in the meta-analysis of binary outcomes from sparse data. Vázquez-Polo FJ; Moreno E; Negrín MA; Martel M Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2015 Apr; 15(2):317-22. PubMed ID: 25673174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Meta-analytic tools for medical decision making: a practical guide. Hasselblad V; McCrory DC Med Decis Making; 1995; 15(1):81-96. PubMed ID: 7898302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The statistical basis of meta-analysis. Fleiss JL Stat Methods Med Res; 1993; 2(2):121-45. PubMed ID: 8261254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modelling methodologic quality into meta-analyses and pitfalls of not doing this. Doi SA Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Mar; 87(3):985-6; author reply 986. PubMed ID: 19231449 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of ROC curves. Arends LR; Hamza TH; van Houwelingen JC; Heijenbrok-Kal MH; Hunink MG; Stijnen T Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(5):621-38. PubMed ID: 18591542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comment on: Heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be expected and appropriately quantified. Coory MD Int J Epidemiol; 2010 Jun; 39(3):932; author reply 933. PubMed ID: 19349478 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. On mixture models for diagnostic meta-analyses. Eusebi P; Reitsma JB; Vermunt JK J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 68(12):1523. PubMed ID: 25744133 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Commentary on 'Multivariate meta-analysis: potential and promise'. Harbord RM Stat Med; 2011 Sep; 30(20):2507-8; discussion 2509-10. PubMed ID: 21706516 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. On the analysis of heterogeneity within diagnostic meta-analyses based on mixture models. Schlattmann P; Dewey M; Walther M J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 68(12):1523-4. PubMed ID: 25735961 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. On bias and precision in meta-analysis: the error in the error. Hansen TF J Evol Biol; 2016 Oct; 29(10):1919-1921. PubMed ID: 27397799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. HELOW: a program for testing extreme homogeneity in meta-analysis. Zintzaras E; Ioannidis JP Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Nov; 117(2):383-6. PubMed ID: 25023534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Synthesis of median survival time in meta-analysis. Zang J; Xiang C; He J Epidemiology; 2013 Mar; 24(2):337-8. PubMed ID: 23377098 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Where to with meta-analysis?--First, do no harm. Silverstein B Scand J Work Environ Health; 2003 Dec; 29(6):442-3. PubMed ID: 14712851 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Meta-analysis: fact or fiction? How to interpret meta-analyses. Huf W; Kalcher K; Pail G; Friedrich ME; Filzmoser P; Kasper S World J Biol Psychiatry; 2011 Apr; 12(3):188-200. PubMed ID: 21375365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multi-level model synthesis of median survival time in meta-analysis. Zang J; Xu J; Xiang C; He J; Zou S Epidemiology; 2015 Jan; 26(1):e2-3. PubMed ID: 25437323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]