186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26808701)
1. Comparative Evaluation of Use of 400-μm and 350-μm Microkeratome Head to Prepare Donor Tissue in Cases of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty.
Jain S; Sharma N; Maharana PK; Agarwal T; Sinha R; Vajpayee RB
Eye Contact Lens; 2017 Mar; 43(2):130-134. PubMed ID: 26808701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ultrathin descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with the microkeratome double-pass technique: two-year outcomes.
Busin M; Madi S; Santorum P; Scorcia V; Beltz J
Ophthalmology; 2013 Jun; 120(6):1186-94. PubMed ID: 23466268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Thin lenticule Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: single, slow pass technique.
Vajpayee RB; Maharana PK; Jain S; Sharma N; Jhanji V
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 42(5):411-6. PubMed ID: 24224697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The First 100 Eyes of Standardized Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Standardized Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.
Hamzaoglu EC; Straiko MD; Mayko ZM; Sáles CS; Terry MA
Ophthalmology; 2015 Nov; 122(11):2193-9. PubMed ID: 26271841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual Outcomes and Graft Thickness in Microthin DSAEK--One-Year Results.
Roberts HW; Mukherjee A; Aichner H; Rajan MS
Cornea; 2015 Nov; 34(11):1345-50. PubMed ID: 26312621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Dunker SL; Dickman MM; Wisse RPL; Nobacht S; Wijdh RHJ; Bartels MC; Tang ML; van den Biggelaar FJHM; Kruit PJ; Nuijts RMMA
Ophthalmology; 2020 Sep; 127(9):1152-1159. PubMed ID: 32386811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microkeratome-assisted ultrathin Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: A randomized trial comparing single-pass versus double-pass technique.
Sharma N; Hussain AY; Nagpal R; Rathi A; Maharana PK; Sinha R; Agarwal T; Titiyal JS
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2019 Aug; 67(8):1289-1294. PubMed ID: 31332110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Simple Single-Pass Technique for Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Pilot Study.
Dimitry MES; Lewis AD; Zacharaki F; Chandran M; Robson D; Menon G; Poole TRG
Cornea; 2017 Oct; 36(10):1178-1183. PubMed ID: 28742617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy: a controlled prospective study on visual recovery after endothelial keratoplasty.
Nielsen E; Ivarsen A; Kristensen S; Hjortdal J
Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Dec; 94(8):780-787. PubMed ID: 27273977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial of Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK) versus DSAEK.
Dickman MM; Kruit PJ; Remeijer L; van Rooij J; Van der Lelij A; Wijdh RH; van den Biggelaar FJ; Berendschot TT; Nuijts RM
Ophthalmology; 2016 Nov; 123(11):2276-2284. PubMed ID: 27659544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Irregularity of the posterior corneal surface after curved interface femtosecond laser-assisted versus microkeratome-assisted descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.
Vetter JM; Butsch C; Faust M; Schmidtmann I; Hoffmann EM; Sekundo W; Pfeiffer N
Cornea; 2013 Feb; 32(2):118-24. PubMed ID: 23132446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Early results of small-incision Descemet's stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty.
Koenig SB; Covert DJ
Ophthalmology; 2007 Feb; 114(2):221-6. PubMed ID: 17156845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Visual Outcomes After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty-Comparison of Specific Matched Pairs.
Droutsas K; Lazaridis A; Papaconstantinou D; Brouzas D; Moschos MM; Schulze S; Sekundo W
Cornea; 2016 Jun; 35(6):765-71. PubMed ID: 27032019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: the tenuous relationship between donor thickness and postoperative vision.
Terry MA; Straiko MD; Goshe JM; Li JY; Davis-Boozer D
Ophthalmology; 2012 Oct; 119(10):1988-96. PubMed ID: 22817831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Visual Recovery and Endothelial Cell Survival After Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty for Failed Penetrating Keratoplasty Grafts—A Cohort Study.
Tarantino-Scherrer JN; Kaufmann C; Bochmann F; Bachmann LM; Thiel MA
Cornea; 2015 Sep; 34(9):1024-9. PubMed ID: 26203743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preconditioned donor corneal thickness for microthin endothelial keratoplasty.
Thomas PB; Mukherjee AN; O'Donovan D; Rajan MS
Cornea; 2013 Jul; 32(7):e173-8. PubMed ID: 23665648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty as treatment for graft failure after descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.
Weller JM; Tourtas T; Kruse FE; Schlötzer-Schrehardt U; Fuchsluger T; Bachmann BO
Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jun; 159(6):1050-1057.e2. PubMed ID: 25790736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity following Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.
Ang M; Lim F; Htoon HM; Tan D; Mehta JS
Br J Ophthalmol; 2016 Mar; 100(3):307-11. PubMed ID: 26159453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fellow eye comparison of corneal thickness and curvature in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty and descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.
Goldich Y; Artornsombidth P; Avni-Zauberman N; Perez M; Ulate R; Elbaz U; Rootman DS
Cornea; 2014 Jun; 33(6):547-50. PubMed ID: 24699562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. DMEK versus DSAEK for Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy: A meta-analysis.
Marques RE; Guerra PS; Sousa DC; Gonçalves AI; Quintas AM; Rodrigues W
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2019 Jan; 29(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 29661044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
