BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

386 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26808876)

  • 1. The Integration of LNT and Hormesis for Cancer Risk Assessment Optimizes Public Health Protection.
    Calabrese EJ; Shamoun DY; Hanekamp JC
    Health Phys; 2016 Mar; 110(3):256-9. PubMed ID: 26808876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Model Uncertainty via the Integration of Hormesis and LNT as the Default in Cancer Risk Assessment.
    Calabrese EJ
    Dose Response; 2015; 13(4):1559325815621764. PubMed ID: 26740815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cancer risk assessment: Optimizing human health through linear dose-response models.
    Calabrese EJ; Shamoun DY; Hanekamp JC
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2015 Jul; 81():137-140. PubMed ID: 25916915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The threshold vs LNT showdown: Dose rate findings exposed flaws in the LNT model part 2. How a mistake led BEIR I to adopt LNT.
    Calabrese EJ
    Environ Res; 2017 Apr; 154():452-458. PubMed ID: 27974149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. LNT and cancer risk assessment: Its flawed foundations part 1: Radiation and leukemia: Where LNT began.
    Calabrese EJ
    Environ Res; 2021 Jun; 197():111025. PubMed ID: 33744270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting the effect of ozone on vegetation via linear non-threshold (LNT), threshold and hormetic dose-response models.
    Agathokleous E; Belz RG; Calatayud V; De Marco A; Hoshika Y; Kitao M; Saitanis CJ; Sicard P; Paoletti E; Calabrese EJ
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Feb; 649():61-74. PubMed ID: 30172135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Economic and policy considerations drive the LNT debate.
    Mossman KL
    Radiat Res; 2008 Feb; 169(2):245; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 18220464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the estimation of radiation-induced cancer risks from very low doses of radiation and how to communicate these risks.
    Mattsson S; Nilsson M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):17-21. PubMed ID: 25802468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are We Approaching the End of the Linear No-Threshold Era?
    Doss M
    J Nucl Med; 2018 Dec; 59(12):1786-1793. PubMed ID: 30262515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Linear No-Threshold model and standards for protection against radiation.
    Shamoun DY
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Jun; 77():49-53. PubMed ID: 26924276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Linear-no-threshold is a radiation-protection standard rather than a mechanistic effect model.
    Breckow J
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2006 Mar; 44(4):257-60. PubMed ID: 16468065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pooled Bayesian meta-analysis of two Polish studies on radiation-induced cancers.
    Fornalski KW
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Nov; 167(1-3):306-10. PubMed ID: 25956788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recent reports on the effect of low doses of ionizing radiation and its dose-effect relationship.
    Tubiana M; Aurengo A; Averbeck D; Masse R
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2006 Mar; 44(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 16468064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. From Muller to mechanism: How LNT became the default model for cancer risk assessment.
    Calabrese EJ
    Environ Pollut; 2018 Oct; 241():289-302. PubMed ID: 29843011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Future of Radiation Protection Regulations.
    Doss M
    Health Phys; 2016 Mar; 110(3):274-5. PubMed ID: 26808881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The threshold vs LNT showdown: Dose rate findings exposed flaws in the LNT model part 1. The Russell-Muller debate.
    Calabrese EJ
    Environ Res; 2017 Apr; 154():435-451. PubMed ID: 28109526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The challenges of defining hormesis in epidemiological studies: The case of radiation hormesis.
    Iavicoli I; Fontana L; Santocono C; Guarino D; Laudiero M; Calabrese EJ
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Dec; 902():166030. PubMed ID: 37544458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Low-dose radiation risk extrapolation fallacy associated with the linear-no-threshold model.
    Scott BR
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2008 Feb; 27(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 18480143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What are the risks from medical X-rays and other low dose radiation?
    Wall BF; Kendall GM; Edwards AA; Bouffler S; Muirhead CR; Meara JR
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Apr; 79(940):285-94. PubMed ID: 16585719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Origin of the linearity no threshold (LNT) dose-response concept.
    Calabrese EJ
    Arch Toxicol; 2013 Sep; 87(9):1621-33. PubMed ID: 23887208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.