BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26809207)

  • 1. [The 2014 consensus conference of the ISUP on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma].
    Kristiansen G; Egevad L; Amin M; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Humphrey PA; Epstein JI;
    Pathologe; 2016 Feb; 37(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 26809207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. SOCS3 Immunohistochemical Expression Seems to Support the 2005 and 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Modified Gleason Grading System.
    Pierconti F; Martini M; Cenci T; Petrone GL; Ricci R; Sacco E; Bassi PF; Larocca LM
    Prostate; 2017 May; 77(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 28144985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.
    Epstein JI; Egevad L; Amin MB; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Humphrey PA;
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Feb; 40(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 26492179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
    Epstein JI; Amin MB; Reuter VE; Humphrey PA
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. From Gleason to International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading of prostate cancer.
    Samaratunga H; Delahunt B; Yaxley J; Srigley JR; Egevad L
    Scand J Urol; 2016 Oct; 50(5):325-9. PubMed ID: 27415753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Controversial issues in Gleason and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) prostate cancer grading: proposed recommendations for international implementation.
    Srigley JR; Delahunt B; Samaratunga H; Billis A; Cheng L; Clouston D; Evans A; Furusato B; Kench J; Leite K; MacLennan G; Moch H; Pan CC; Rioux-Leclercq N; Ro J; Shanks J; Shen S; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Wheeler T; Yaxley J; Egevad L
    Pathology; 2019 Aug; 51(5):463-473. PubMed ID: 31279442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading of prostate cancer - An ISUP consensus on contemporary grading.
    Egevad L; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Samaratunga H
    APMIS; 2016 Jun; 124(6):433-5. PubMed ID: 27150257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prostate cancer glands with cribriform architecture and with glomeruloid features should be considered as Gleason pattern 4 and not pattern 3.
    Minardi D; Mazzucchelli R; Scarpelli M; Massari F; Ciccarese C; Lopez-Beltran A; Cheng L; Montironi R
    Future Oncol; 2016 Jun; 12(12):1431-3. PubMed ID: 27189718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The 2019 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
    van Leenders GJLH; van der Kwast TH; Grignon DJ; Evans AJ; Kristiansen G; Kweldam CF; Litjens G; McKenney JK; Melamed J; Mottet N; Paner GP; Samaratunga H; Schoots IG; Simko JP; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Warren AY; Wheeler TM; Williamson SR; Iczkowski KA;
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2020 Aug; 44(8):e87-e99. PubMed ID: 32459716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Prostate cancer. Part 2: Review of the various tumor grading systems over the years 1966-2015 and future perspectives of the new grading of the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP)].
    Helpap B; Bubendorf L; Kristiansen G
    Pathologe; 2016 Feb; 37(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 26792002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evolution, controversies and the future of prostate cancer grading.
    Egevad L; Delahunt B; Yaxley J; Samaratunga H
    Pathol Int; 2019 Feb; 69(2):55-66. PubMed ID: 30694570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Grading of prostate cancer].
    Kristiansen G; Roth W; Helpap B
    Pathologe; 2016 Jul; 37(4):352-4. PubMed ID: 27393141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prostate cancer: from Gleason scoring to prognostic grade grouping.
    Montironi R; Santoni M; Mazzucchelli R; Burattini L; Berardi R; Galosi AB; Cheng L; Lopez-Beltran A; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Scarpelli M
    Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2016; 16(4):433-40. PubMed ID: 27008205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Impact of International Association of Urological Pathology Gleason scoring system on prostatic carcinoma grading: a preliminary analysis of 185 cases].
    Wang G; Shen D
    Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 43(10):677-9. PubMed ID: 25567594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading for prostatic adenocarcinoma in thin core biopsies using TROG 03.04 'RADAR' trial clinical data.
    Delahunt B; Egevad L; Srigley JR; Steigler A; Murray JD; Atkinson C; Matthews J; Duchesne G; Spry NA; Christie D; Joseph D; Attia J; Denham JW
    Pathology; 2015 Oct; 47(6):520-5. PubMed ID: 26325671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implications of the International Society of Urological Pathology modified Gleason grading system.
    Egevad L; Mazzucchelli R; Montironi R
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Apr; 136(4):426-34. PubMed ID: 22458905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gleason grading: past, present and future.
    Delahunt B; Miller RJ; Srigley JR; Evans AJ; Samaratunga H
    Histopathology; 2012 Jan; 60(1):75-86. PubMed ID: 22212079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prostate Cancer Grading: A Decade After the 2005 Modified Gleason Grading System.
    Kryvenko ON; Epstein JI
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Oct; 140(10):1140-52. PubMed ID: 26756649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prostate cancer with cribriform morphology: diagnosis, aggressiveness, molecular pathology and possible relationships with intraductal carcinoma.
    Montironi R; Cimadamore A; Gasparrini S; Mazzucchelli R; Santoni M; Massari F; Cheng L; Lopez-Beltran A; Scarpelli M
    Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2018 Jul; 18(7):685-693. PubMed ID: 29699428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Basic features of the ISUP prostate carcinoma Gleason grading system: a preliminary analysis].
    Wang GW; Shen DH
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2014 Jun; 20(6):514-7. PubMed ID: 25029856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.