These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26809328)

  • 21. Amplitude-mapping effects on speech intelligibility with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants.
    van Hoesel R; Böhm M; Battmer RD; Beckschebe J; Lenarz T
    Ear Hear; 2005 Aug; 26(4):381-8. PubMed ID: 16079633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of loudness-level weightings for assessing the annoyance of environmental noise.
    Schomer PD; Suzuki Y; Saito F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov; 110(5 Pt 1):2390-7. PubMed ID: 11757929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effects of digital signal processing features on children's speech recognition and loudness perception.
    Crukley J; Scollie SD
    Am J Audiol; 2014 Mar; 23(1):99-115. PubMed ID: 24018572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Binaural versus monaural loudness: supersummation of tone partially masked by noise.
    Marks LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jan; 81(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 3819169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Incorporation of loudness measures in active noise control.
    Sommerfeldt SD; Samuels TO
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Feb; 109(2):591-9. PubMed ID: 11248966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The determination of tinnitus loudness considering the effects of recruitment.
    Tyler RS; Conrad-Armes D
    J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Mar; 26(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 6865383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Intensity discrimination and loudness for tones in broadband noise.
    Schneider BA; Parker S
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Jan; 47(1):92-4. PubMed ID: 2300430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Derivation of frequency-gain characteristics for maximizing speech reception in noise.
    Rankovic CM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Aug; 38(4):913-29. PubMed ID: 7474983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dynamic Current Focusing: A Novel Approach to Loudness Coding in Cochlear Implants.
    de Jong MAM; Briaire JJ; Frijns JHM
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 29742542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Perceived magnitude of two-tone-noise complexes: loudness, annoyance, and noisiness.
    Hellman RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Apr; 77(4):1497-504. PubMed ID: 3989104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Factors affecting the loudness of modulated sounds.
    Moore BC; Vickers DA; Baer T; Launer S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 May; 105(5):2757-72. PubMed ID: 10335628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Restoration of loudness summation and differential loudness growth in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Strelcyk O; Nooraei N; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2557-68. PubMed ID: 23039449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dynamic frequency change influences loudness perception: a central, analytic process.
    Neuhoff JG; McBeath MK; Wanzie WC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Aug; 25(4):1050-9. PubMed ID: 10464944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Loudness summation of equal loud narrowband signals in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Ewert SD; Oetting D
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S71-S80. PubMed ID: 28971746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Loudness perception for short-duration tones in masking noise.
    Richards AM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1977 Dec; 20(4):684-93. PubMed ID: 604682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of pedagogical ideology on the perceived loudness and noise levels in preschools.
    Jonsdottir V; Rantala LM; Oskarsson GK; Sala E
    Noise Health; 2015; 17(78):282-93. PubMed ID: 26356370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The objective-subjective assessment of noise: young adults can estimate loudness of events and lifestyle noise.
    Beach EF; Williams W; Gilliver M
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jun; 51(6):444-9. PubMed ID: 22380619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Use of test-retest measures to evaluate performance stability in adults with cochlear implants.
    Skinner MW; Holden LK; Demorest ME; Holden TA
    Ear Hear; 1995 Apr; 16(2):187-97. PubMed ID: 7789670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Loudness of sounds with a subcritical bandwidth: a challenge to current loudness models?
    Hots J; Rennies J; Verhey JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):EL334-9. PubMed ID: 24116539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.