These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
463 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26809333)
1. The Secondary Quality Indicator to Improve Prediction of Adenoma Miss Rate Apart from Adenoma Detection Rate. Aniwan S; Orkoonsawat P; Viriyautsahakul V; Angsuwatcharakon P; Pittayanon R; Wisedopas N; Sumdin S; Ponuthai Y; Wiangngoen S; Kullavanijaya P; Rerknimitr R Am J Gastroenterol; 2016 May; 111(5):723-9. PubMed ID: 26809333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlation between Surrogate Quality Indicators for Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenoma Miss Rate in Qualified Colonoscopy, CORE Study: KASID Multicenter Study. Han JH; Kim HG; Ahn EM; Park S; Jeon SR; Cha JM; Kwak MS; Jung Y; Shin JE; Shin HD; Cho YS Gut Liver; 2022 Sep; 16(5):716-725. PubMed ID: 34933279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of adenomas per colonoscopy and adenomas per positive participant as new quality parameters in screening colonoscopy. Gessl I; Waldmann E; Penz D; Majcher B; Dokladanska A; Hinterberger A; Szymanska A; Ferlitsch A; Trauner M; Ferlitsch M Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):496-502. PubMed ID: 30138613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Endoscopist characteristics that influence the quality of colonoscopy. Jover R; Zapater P; Bujanda L; Hernández V; Cubiella J; Pellisé M; Ponce M; Ono A; Lanas A; Seoane A; Marín-Gabriel JC; Chaparro M; Cacho G; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Fernández-Díez S; Peris A; Nicolás-Pérez D; Murcia O; Castells A; Quintero E; Endoscopy; 2016 Mar; 48(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 26845473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Usefulness of mean number of adenomas per positive screenee for identifying meticulous endoscopists among those who achieve acceptable adenoma detection rates. Aniwan S; Vanduangden K; Kerr SJ; Wisedopas N; Kongtab N; Kullavanijaya P; Rerknimitr R Endoscopy; 2021 Apr; 53(4):394-401. PubMed ID: 32544957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnitude, Risk Factors, and Factors Associated With Adenoma Miss Rate of Tandem Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Zhao S; Wang S; Pan P; Xia T; Chang X; Yang X; Guo L; Meng Q; Yang F; Qian W; Xu Z; Wang Y; Wang Z; Gu L; Wang R; Jia F; Yao J; Li Z; Bai Y Gastroenterology; 2019 May; 156(6):1661-1674.e11. PubMed ID: 30738046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of adenoma detection rate and adenoma per colonoscopy as a quality indicator of colonoscopy. Park SK; Kim HY; Lee CK; Cha JM; Eun CS; Han DS; Lee BI; Shin JE; Park DI Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Jul; 51(7):886-90. PubMed ID: 27001284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry. Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Weiss JE; Robinson CM Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1188-1194. PubMed ID: 28153571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adenoma detection rate is necessary but insufficient for distinguishing high versus low endoscopist performance. Wang HS; Pisegna J; Modi R; Liang LJ; Atia M; Nguyen M; Cohen H; Ohning G; van Oijen M; Spiegel BM Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jan; 77(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 23261096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation between adenoma detection rate and novel quality indicators for screening colonoscopy. A proposal for quality measures tool kit. Abdelfatah MM; Elhanafi S; Zuckerman MJ; Othman MO Scand J Gastroenterol; 2017 Oct; 52(10):1148-1157. PubMed ID: 28643529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adenoma miss rates associated with a 3-minute versus 6-minute colonoscopy withdrawal time: a prospective, randomized trial. Kumar S; Thosani N; Ladabaum U; Friedland S; Chen AM; Kochar R; Banerjee S Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1273-1280. PubMed ID: 27931951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adenomas per colonoscopy and adenoma per positive participant as quality indicators for screening colonoscopy. Wang S; Kim AS; Church TR; Perdue DG; Shaukat A Endosc Int Open; 2020 Nov; 8(11):E1560-E1565. PubMed ID: 33140011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Adenoma Detection Rate in Asymptomatic Patients with Positive Fecal Immunochemical Tests. Kligman E; Li W; Eckert GJ; Kahi C Dig Dis Sci; 2018 May; 63(5):1167-1172. PubMed ID: 29468377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anatomic and advanced adenoma detection rates as quality metrics determined via natural language processing. Gawron AJ; Thompson WK; Keswani RN; Rasmussen LV; Kho AN Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Dec; 109(12):1844-9. PubMed ID: 24935271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lower Adenoma Miss Rate of Computer-Aided Detection-Assisted Colonoscopy vs Routine White-Light Colonoscopy in a Prospective Tandem Study. Wang P; Liu P; Glissen Brown JR; Berzin TM; Zhou G; Lei S; Liu X; Li L; Xiao X Gastroenterology; 2020 Oct; 159(4):1252-1261.e5. PubMed ID: 32562721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differences in detection rates of adenomas and serrated polyps in screening versus surveillance colonoscopies, based on the new hampshire colonoscopy registry. Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Goodrich M; Robinson CM; Weiss JE Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Oct; 11(10):1308-12. PubMed ID: 23660415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Serrated polyp detection and risk of interval post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer: a population-based study. van Toledo DEFWM; IJspeert JEG; Bossuyt PMM; Bleijenberg AGC; van Leerdam ME; van der Vlugt M; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Spaander MCW; Dekker E Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Aug; 7(8):747-754. PubMed ID: 35550250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Defining Benchmarks for Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenomas Per Colonoscopy in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy Due to a Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test. Hilsden RJ; Bridges R; Dube C; McGregor SE; Naugler C; Rose SM; Rostom A; Heitman SJ Am J Gastroenterol; 2016 Dec; 111(12):1743-1749. PubMed ID: 27725649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]