360 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26809627)
41. Urgent endoscopy in severe non-variceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: does the Glasgow-Blatchford score help endoscopists?
Attar A; Sebbagh V; Vicaut E; Le Toumelin P; Bouhnik Y
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2012 Sep; 47(8-9):1086-93. PubMed ID: 22775006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Predictive validity of the Glasgow Blatchford Bleeding Score in an unselected emergency department population in continental Europe.
Schiefer M; Aquarius M; Leffers P; Stassen P; van Deursen C; Oostenbrug L; Jansen L; Masclee A; Keulemans YC
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Apr; 24(4):382-7. PubMed ID: 22228368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Comparison of Pre-Endoscopic C-WATCH Score with Established Risk Assessment Tools in Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
Allo G; Bürger M; Gillessen J; Kasper P; Franklin J; Mück V; Nierhoff D; Steffen HM; Goeser T; Schramm C
Dig Dis; 2022; 40(6):826-834. PubMed ID: 35073555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The prognostic significance of the risk scores at upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Uysal Y; Babus SB; Kose A; Ates F; Biricik S; Erdogan S; Cevik I; Toker I; Ayrik C
Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Aug; 22(8):1099-1108. PubMed ID: 31417053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [Comparison between Glascow-Blatchford, Rockall and AIMS65 scores in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a hospital in Lima, Peru].
Espinoza-Ríos J; Aguilar Sánchez V; Bravo Paredes EA; Pinto Valdivia J; Huerta-Mercado Tenorio J
Rev Gastroenterol Peru; 2016; 36(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 27409091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Outpatient management of patients with low-risk upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage: multicentre validation and prospective evaluation.
Stanley AJ; Ashley D; Dalton HR; Mowat C; Gaya DR; Thompson E; Warshow U; Groome M; Cahill A; Benson G; Blatchford O; Murray W
Lancet; 2009 Jan; 373(9657):42-7. PubMed ID: 19091393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The Shock Index is not accurate at predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Saffouri E; Blackwell C; Laursen SB; Laine L; Dalton HR; Ngu J; Shultz M; Norton R; Stanley AJ
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2020 Jan; 51(2):253-260. PubMed ID: 31642558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. [Validation of the Glasgow-Blatchford Scoring System to predict mortality in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a hospital of Lima, Peru (June 2012-December 2013)].
Cassana A; Scialom S; Segura E; Chacaltana A
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2015 Jul; 107(8):476-82. PubMed ID: 26228950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Comparison of various prognostic scores in variceal and non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A prospective cohort study.
Rout G; Sharma S; Gunjan D; Kedia S; Nayak B; Shalimar
Indian J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr; 38(2):158-166. PubMed ID: 30830583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. External validation of scoring systems in risk stratification of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Anchu AC; Mohsina S; Sureshkumar S; Mahalakshmy T; Kate V
Indian J Gastroenterol; 2017 Mar; 36(2):105-112. PubMed ID: 28393330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Usefulness of the Glasgow-Blatchford score to predict 1-week mortality in patients with esophageal variceal bleeding.
Iino C; Shimoyama T; Igarashi T; Aihara T; Ishii K; Sakamoto J; Tono H; Fukuda S
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017 May; 29(5):547-551. PubMed ID: 28350744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford score, and Rockall score in a European series of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: performance when predicting in-hospital and delayed mortality.
Martínez-Cara JG; Jiménez-Rosales R; Úbeda-Muñoz M; de Hierro ML; de Teresa J; Redondo-Cerezo E
United European Gastroenterol J; 2016 Jun; 4(3):371-9. PubMed ID: 27403303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Risk assessment scores for patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and their use in clinical practice.
Waddell KM; Stanley AJ
Hosp Pract (1995); 2015; 43(5):290-8. PubMed ID: 26536295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The Clinical Impact of Rockall and Glasgow-Blatchford Scores in Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
Maia S; Falcão D; Silva J; Pedroto I
GE Port J Gastroenterol; 2021 Jul; 28(4):243-252. PubMed ID: 34386553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The Glasgow Blatchford score is the most accurate assessment of patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage.
Laursen SB; Hansen JM; Schaffalitzky de Muckadell OB
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Oct; 10(10):1130-1135.e1. PubMed ID: 22801061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Comparison of 3 scoring systems to predict mortality from unstable upper gastrointestinal bleeding in cirrhotic patients.
Hsu SC; Chen CY; Weng YM; Chen SY; Lin CC; Chen JC
Am J Emerg Med; 2014 May; 32(5):417-20. PubMed ID: 24560395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Prediction of adverse outcomes using non-endoscopic scoring systems in patients over 80 years of age who present with the upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
Bardakçı O; Sıddıkoğlu D; Akdur G; Şimşek G; Atalay Ü; Das M; Akdur O; Beyazit Y
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg; 2022 Jan; 28(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 34967427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Different scoring systems to predict 6-week mortality in cirrhosis patients with acute variceal bleeding: a retrospective analysis of 202 patients.
Wang F; Cui S; Wang F; Li F; Tang F; Zhang X; Gao Y; Lv H
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018; 53(7):885-890. PubMed ID: 29911438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Risk analysis of 30-day rebleeding in acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Wang X; Yang M; Xu J; Kuai Y; Sun B
Arab J Gastroenterol; 2023 May; 24(2):136-141. PubMed ID: 37263819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. CHAMPS score in predicting mortality of patients with acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Aydin H; Berikol GB; Erdogan MO; Gemici E; Doğan H
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2023; 69(4):e20221052. PubMed ID: 37075441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
