These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26809812)

  • 1. Multiple imputation of multiple multi-item scales when a full imputation model is infeasible.
    Plumpton CO; Morris T; Hughes DA; White IR
    BMC Res Notes; 2016 Jan; 9():45. PubMed ID: 26809812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Passive imputation and parcel summaries are both valid to handle missing items in studies with many multi-item scales.
    Eekhout I; de Vet HC; de Boer MR; Twisk JW; Heymans MW
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Apr; 27(4):1128-1140. PubMed ID: 27334917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multiple imputation for patient reported outcome measures in randomised controlled trials: advantages and disadvantages of imputing at the item, subscale or composite score level.
    Rombach I; Gray AM; Jenkinson C; Murray DW; Rivero-Arias O
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Aug; 18(1):87. PubMed ID: 30153796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Missing data on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: a comparison of 4 imputation techniques.
    Bono C; Ried LD; Kimberlin C; Vogel B
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2007 Mar; 3(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 17350555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiple imputation for non-response when estimating HIV prevalence using survey data.
    Chinomona A; Mwambi H
    BMC Public Health; 2015 Oct; 15():1059. PubMed ID: 26475303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Item non-response imputation in the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
    Son S; Moon H; An H
    Epidemiol Health; 2022; 44():e2022096. PubMed ID: 36317400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Review and evaluation of imputation methods for multivariate longitudinal data with mixed-type incomplete variables.
    Cao Y; Allore H; Vander Wyk B; Gutman R
    Stat Med; 2022 Dec; 41(30):5844-5876. PubMed ID: 36220138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction Model Performance With Different Imputation Strategies: A Simulation Study Using a North American ICU Registry.
    Steif J; Brant R; Sreepada RS; West N; Murthy S; Görges M
    Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2022 Jan; 23(1):e29-e44. PubMed ID: 34560774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The multiple imputation method: a case study involving secondary data analysis.
    Walani SR; Cleland CM
    Nurse Res; 2015 May; 22(5):13-9. PubMed ID: 25976532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Logistic regression vs. predictive mean matching for imputing binary covariates.
    Austin PC; van Buuren S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Nov; 32(11):2172-2183. PubMed ID: 37750213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is there a role for expectation maximization imputation in addressing missing data in research using WOMAC questionnaire? Comparison to the standard mean approach and a tutorial.
    Ghomrawi HM; Mandl LA; Rutledge J; Alexiades MM; Mazumdar M
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2011 May; 12():109. PubMed ID: 21605458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of methods for imputing limited-range variables: a simulation study.
    Rodwell L; Lee KJ; Romaniuk H; Carlin JB
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Apr; 14():57. PubMed ID: 24766825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of methods for imputing ordinal data using multivariate normal imputation: a case study of non-linear effects in a large cohort study.
    Lee KJ; Galati JC; Simpson JA; Carlin JB
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(30):4164-74. PubMed ID: 22826110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiple imputation to deal with missing EQ-5D-3L data: Should we impute individual domains or the actual index?
    Simons CL; Rivero-Arias O; Yu LM; Simon J
    Qual Life Res; 2015 Apr; 24(4):805-15. PubMed ID: 25471286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Imputation of missing values of tumour stage in population-based cancer registration.
    Eisemann N; Waldmann A; Katalinic A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Sep; 11():129. PubMed ID: 21929796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. PROMIS Global Health item nonresponse: is it better to impute missing item responses before computing T-scores?
    Thompson NR; Katzan IL; Honomichl RD; Lapin BR
    Qual Life Res; 2020 Feb; 29(2):537-546. PubMed ID: 31630291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of multiple imputation strategies for handling missing data in multi-item scales: Guidance for longitudinal studies.
    Mainzer R; Apajee J; Nguyen CD; Carlin JB; Lee KJ
    Stat Med; 2021 Sep; 40(21):4660-4674. PubMed ID: 34102709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A two-step semiparametric method to accommodate sampling weights in multiple imputation.
    Zhou H; Elliott MR; Raghunathan TE
    Biometrics; 2016 Mar; 72(1):242-52. PubMed ID: 26393409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Missing data in a multi-item instrument were best handled by multiple imputation at the item score level.
    Eekhout I; de Vet HC; Twisk JW; Brand JP; de Boer MR; Heymans MW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Mar; 67(3):335-42. PubMed ID: 24291505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dealing with missing covariates in epidemiologic studies: a comparison between multiple imputation and a full Bayesian approach.
    Erler NS; Rizopoulos D; Rosmalen Jv; Jaddoe VW; Franco OH; Lesaffre EM
    Stat Med; 2016 Jul; 35(17):2955-74. PubMed ID: 27042954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.