201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26810138)
1. DCIS of the breast: The value of preoperative MRI.
Doyle AJ; Prakash S; Wang K; Cranshaw I; Taylor E; Oldfield R
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2016 Apr; 60(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 26810138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preoperative MRI of pure intraductal breast carcinoma--a valuable adjunct to mammography in assessing cancer extent.
Santamaría G; Velasco M; Farrús B; Zanón G; Fernández PL
Breast; 2008 Apr; 17(2):186-94. PubMed ID: 17964786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preoperative prediction of the size of pure ductal carcinoma in situ using three imaging modalities as compared to histopathological size: does magnetic resonance imaging add value?
Daniel OK; Lim SM; Kim JH; Park HS; Park S; Kim SI
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Jul; 164(2):437-444. PubMed ID: 28439735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Role of preoperative breast MRI in ductal carcinoma in situ for prediction of the presence and assessment of the extent of occult invasive component.
Nori J; Meattini I; Giannotti E; Abdulcadir D; Mariscotti G; Calabrese M; Angelino F; Chiesa F; Saieva C; Vanzi E; Boeri C; Bianchi S; Sanchez L; Orzalesi L; Casella D; Susini T; Livi L
Breast J; 2014; 20(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 24750509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of mammography, ultrasound, and MRI in size assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ with histopathologic correlation.
Baek SH; Choi WJ; Cha JH; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Chae EY
Acta Radiol; 2017 Dec; 58(12):1434-1441. PubMed ID: 28281788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Added Value of Breast MRI for Preoperative Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Diagnostic Performance on 362 Patients.
Petrillo A; Fusco R; Petrillo M; Triunfo F; Filice S; Vallone P; Setola SV; Rubulotta M; Di Bonito M; Rinaldo M; D'Aiuto M; Brunetti A
Clin Breast Cancer; 2017 Jun; 17(3):e127-e134. PubMed ID: 28111130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Histopathological characteristics of breast ductal carcinoma in situ and association with imaging findings.
Tang X; Yamashita T; Hara M; Kumaki N; Tokuda Y; Masuda S
Breast Cancer; 2016 May; 23(3):491-8. PubMed ID: 25644245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening-detected calcified and non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: differences in the imaging and histopathological features.
Mun HS; Shin HJ; Kim HH; Cha JH; Kim H
Clin Radiol; 2013 Jan; 68(1):e27-35. PubMed ID: 23177096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Determination of the presence and extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ by mammography and magnetic resonance imaging.
Menell JH; Morris EA; Dershaw DD; Abramson AF; Brogi E; Liberman L
Breast J; 2005; 11(6):382-90. PubMed ID: 16297080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Extension of ductal carcinoma in situ: histopathological association with MR imaging and mammography.
Shiraishi A; Kurosaki Y; Maehara T; Suzuki M; Kurosumi M
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2003 Dec; 2(4):159-63. PubMed ID: 16222109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensitivity of breast MRI for ductal carcinoma in situ appearing as microcalcifications only on mammography.
Rinaldi P; Buccheri C; Giuliani M; Bufi E; Romani M; Patrolecco F; Belli P; Bonomo L
Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(6):1207-1212. PubMed ID: 27618803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The diagnostic sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and breast-specific gamma imaging in women with calcified and non-calcified DCIS.
Kim JS; Lee SM; Cha ES
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 24043881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictive significance of breast-specific gamma imaging for upstaging core-needle biopsy-detected ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive cancer.
Yoo J; Kim BS; Yoon HJ
Ann Nucl Med; 2018 Jun; 32(5):328-336. PubMed ID: 29556944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is there a role for MRI in the preoperative assessment of patients with DCIS?
Allen LR; Lago-Toro CE; Hughes JH; Careaga E; Brown AT; Chernick M; Barrio AV; Frazier TG
Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Sep; 17(9):2395-400. PubMed ID: 20217259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast MRI of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: sensitivity of diagnosis and influence of lesion characteristics.
Baur A; Bahrs SD; Speck S; Wietek BM; Krämer B; Vogel U; Claussen CD; Siegmann-Luz KC
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):1731-7. PubMed ID: 23743052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 3-T breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography.
Stehouwer BL; Merckel LG; Verkooijen HM; Peters NH; Mann RM; Duvivier KM; Mali WP; Peeters PH; Veldhuis WB; van den Bosch MA
Eur Radiol; 2014 Mar; 24(3):603-9. PubMed ID: 24078055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI reveals the extent and the microvascular pattern of breast ductal carcinoma in situ.
Santamaría G; Velasco M; Farrús B; Caparrós FX; Fernández PL
Breast J; 2013; 19(4):402-10. PubMed ID: 23758454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ with mammography, breast specific gamma imaging, and magnetic resonance imaging: a comparative study.
Brem RF; Fishman M; Rapelyea JA
Acad Radiol; 2007 Aug; 14(8):945-50. PubMed ID: 17659240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MRI for the size assessment of pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): a prospective study of 33 patients.
Marcotte-Bloch C; Balu-Maestro C; Chamorey E; Ettore F; Raoust I; Flipo B; Chapellier C
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):462-7. PubMed ID: 19896789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast Cancer Screening With Mammography Plus Ultrasonography or Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Women 50 Years or Younger at Diagnosis and Treated With Breast Conservation Therapy.
Cho N; Han W; Han BK; Bae MS; Ko ES; Nam SJ; Chae EY; Lee JW; Kim SH; Kang BJ; Song BJ; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Kim SI; Kim SM; Kang E; Choi Y; Kim HH; Moon WK
JAMA Oncol; 2017 Nov; 3(11):1495-1502. PubMed ID: 28655029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
