These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26810294)

  • 1. Frequency-specific Animal Sound Test (FAST) 4: A valid method for hearing screening.
    Nolte A; Coninx F; Müller F; Hess M; Wiesner T; Dudek N; Rohlfs AK
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Feb; 81():68-79. PubMed ID: 26810294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High-frequency pure-tone audiometry in children: a test-retest reliability study relative to ototoxic criteria.
    Beahan N; Kei J; Driscoll C; Charles B; Khan A
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 21760512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hearing screening for Japanese children and young adults using the automated auditory brainstem response.
    Soares M; Nakazawa M; Ishikawa K; Sato T; Honda K
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2014 Feb; 41(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 24007629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting the degree of hearing loss using click auditory brainstem response in babies referred from newborn hearing screening.
    Baldwin M; Watkin P
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):361-9. PubMed ID: 23340456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fixed-Level Frequency Threshold Testing for Ototoxicity Monitoring.
    Rieke CC; Clavier OH; Allen LV; Anderson AP; Brooks CA; Fellows AM; Brungart DS; Buckey JC
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):e369-e375. PubMed ID: 28362673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory functions in children at schools for the deaf.
    Karatas E; Kanlikama M; Mumbuc S
    J Natl Med Assoc; 2006 Feb; 98(2):204-10. PubMed ID: 16708506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Continuous versus pulsed pure-tone audiometry in a group of school-aged children.
    van Dijk C; Osman N
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2008; 55():29-36. PubMed ID: 19485067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability in warble-tone sound field audiometry.
    Arlinger SD; Jerlvall LB
    Scand Audiol; 1987; 16(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 3589476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Self-administered hearing loss screening using an interactive, tablet play audiometer with ear bud headphones.
    Yeung JC; Heley S; Beauregard Y; Champagne S; Bromwich MA
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Aug; 79(8):1248-52. PubMed ID: 26055197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection of hearing problems in Aboriginal and Torres strait islander children: a comparison between clinician-administered and self-administrated hearing tests.
    Mealings K; Harkus S; Flesher B; Meyer A; Chung K; Dillon H
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Jun; 59(6):455-463. PubMed ID: 32011198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new hearing screening system for preschool children.
    Wu W; Lü J; Li Y; Kam AC; Fai Tong MC; Huang Z; Wu H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Feb; 78(2):290-5. PubMed ID: 24360950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of age and degree of hearing loss on the agreement and correlation between sound field audiometric thresholds and tone burst auditory brainstem response thresholds in infants and young children.
    Lee CY; Jaw FS; Pan SL; Hsieh TH; Hsu CJ
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2008 Nov; 107(11):869-75. PubMed ID: 18971156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Novel Tablet-Based Approach for Hearing Screening of the Pediatric Population, 516-Patient Study.
    Xiao L; Zou B; Gao L; Weng M; Lando M; Smith AE; Barber W; Yao H
    Laryngoscope; 2020 Sep; 130(9):2245-2251. PubMed ID: 31661567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing pure-tone audiometry and auditory steady state response for the measurement of hearing loss.
    Ahn JH; Lee HS; Kim YJ; Yoon TH; Chung JW
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Jun; 136(6):966-71. PubMed ID: 17547989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of a hearing screening questionnaire for use with Ecuadorian school-aged children.
    Muñoz K; Luzuriaga E; Callow-Heusser C; Ortiz E; White K
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(9):587-92. PubMed ID: 25804301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
    Mills DM; Feeney MP; Gates GA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tablet-based tele-audiometry: Automated hearing screening for schoolchildren.
    Samelli AG; Rabelo CM; Sanches SGG; Martinho AC; Matas CG
    J Telemed Telecare; 2020 Apr; 26(3):140-149. PubMed ID: 30269641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A test protocol for assessing the hearing status of students with special needs.
    Chen HC; Wang NM; Chiu WC; Liu SY; Chang YP; Lin PY; Chung K
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Oct; 78(10):1677-85. PubMed ID: 25112167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automated hearing screening for children: A pilot study in China.
    Kam AC; Gao H; Li LK; Zhao H; Qiu S; Tong MC
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Dec; 52(12):855-60. PubMed ID: 24059596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Evaluation of a method of hearing screening in school children].
    Salvadó A; Salfate J; Araya J
    Rev Chil Pediatr; 1988; 59(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 3238090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.