These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. A non-homogeneous discrete time Markov model for admission scheduling and resource planning in a cost or capacity constrained healthcare system. Garg L; McClean S; Meenan B; Millard P Health Care Manag Sci; 2010 Jun; 13(2):155-69. PubMed ID: 20629417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Markov decision process applied to the control of hospital elective admissions. Nunes LG; de Carvalho SV; Rodrigues Rde C Artif Intell Med; 2009 Oct; 47(2):159-71. PubMed ID: 19699623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simulation-based approximate policy iteration for dynamic patient scheduling for radiation therapy. Gocgun Y Health Care Manag Sci; 2018 Sep; 21(3):317-325. PubMed ID: 27766509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Markov decision process approach to multi-category patient scheduling in a diagnostic facility. Gocgun Y; Bresnahan BW; Ghate A; Gunn ML Artif Intell Med; 2011 Oct; 53(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 21726988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adaptive dynamic programming algorithms for sequential appointment scheduling with patient preferences. Wang J; Fung RY Artif Intell Med; 2015 Jan; 63(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 25542290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Approximate dynamic programming approaches for appointment scheduling with patient preferences. Li X; Wang J; Fung RYK Artif Intell Med; 2018 Apr; 85():16-25. PubMed ID: 29482960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A radiobiological Markov simulation tool for aiding decision making in proton therapy referral. Austin AM; Douglass MJJ; Nguyen GT; Penfold SN Phys Med; 2017 Dec; 44():72-82. PubMed ID: 29254594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Proton therapy expansion under current United States reimbursement models. Kerstiens J; Johnstone PA Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Jun; 89(2):235-40. PubMed ID: 24685152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Forecasting client transitions in British Columbia's Long-Term Care Program. Lane D; Uyeno D; Stark A; Gutman G; McCashin B Health Serv Res; 1987 Dec; 22(5):671-706. PubMed ID: 3121537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Markov decision process approach to temporal modulation of dose fractions in radiation therapy planning. Kim M; Ghate A; Phillips MH Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 54(14):4455-76. PubMed ID: 19556687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamic multistage scheduling for patient-centered care plans. Diamant A Health Care Manag Sci; 2021 Dec; 24(4):827-844. PubMed ID: 34374889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An examination of patient referral and discharge policies using a multiple objective semi-Markov decision process. Schmee J; Hannan E; Mirabile PM J Oper Res Soc; 1979 Feb; 30(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 10240606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A simulation-based neighbourhood search algorithm to schedule multi-category patients at a multi-facility health care diagnostic centre. Jain V; Mohan U Health Syst (Basingstoke); 2018; 7(3):212-229. PubMed ID: 31214349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Variation in patient routine costliness in U.S. psychiatric facilities. Cromwell J; Drozd EM; Gage B; Maier J; Richter E; Goldman HH J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2005 Mar; 8(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 15870482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A dynamic approach for outpatient scheduling. Creps J; Lotfi V J Med Econ; 2017 Aug; 20(8):786-798. PubMed ID: 28402208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The curse of census variation. MacStravic RS Health Care Strateg Manage; 1985 Feb; 3(2):12-6. PubMed ID: 10299915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]