These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26810638)

  • 1. Contrasting Electronic Health Records from Two Different Hospital Systems: Radiologists' Perspective.
    Rinzler E; Shaves S
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Aug; 13(8):960-3. PubMed ID: 26810638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identification of Patient Safety Risks Associated with Electronic Health Records: A Software Quality Perspective.
    Virginio LA; Ricarte IL
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 216():55-9. PubMed ID: 26262009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Public health nurse perceptions of Omaha System data visualization.
    Lee S; Kim E; Monsen KA
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Oct; 84(10):826-34. PubMed ID: 26187244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. End-User Experiences and Expectations Regarding Data Registration and Reuse Before the Implementation of a (New) Electronic Health Record: A Case Study in Two University Hospitals.
    Joukes E; de Keizer N; Abu-Hanna A; de Bruijne M; Cornet R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 216():997. PubMed ID: 26262299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Understanding the Perceived Usefulness and the Ease of Use of a Hospital Information System: the case of a French University Hospital.
    Ologeanu-Taddei R; Morquin D; Bourret R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 210():531-5. PubMed ID: 25991204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Barriers to the Success of Health ICT Implementations - A Report from Norway.
    Granja C; Ulriksen GH; Byd K; Bolle SR; Hartvigsen G
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 221():121. PubMed ID: 27071895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Decision Support System in the Nursing Instruction Information System.
    Huang HL; Chen CJ
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 225():909-10. PubMed ID: 27332404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reflections on electronic medical records: when doctors will use them and when they will not.
    Bleich HL; Slack WV
    Int J Med Inform; 2010 Jan; 79(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 19939731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A study of user requests regarding the fully electronic health record system at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital: challenges for future electronic health record systems.
    Yoo S; Kim S; Lee S; Lee KH; Baek RM; Hwang H
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 May; 82(5):387-97. PubMed ID: 22959193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Why do physicians have difficulty accepting clinical decision support systems?
    Marc DT; Khairat SS
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():1202. PubMed ID: 23920976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors affecting the satisfaction of electronic health records (EHRs) from a physicians' perspectives in implementation.
    Hong SK; Lim MS; Kim KH; Choi JW; Kim JH; Seo JW
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():1019. PubMed ID: 23920793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Incorporating Pharmacy Dispensing Records into Medical Records: Usability Challenges.
    Motulsky A; Couture I; Weir D; Tamblyn R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 221():126. PubMed ID: 27071900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Problems Faced by Nurses in Use of Electronic Health Records During Clinical Practice.
    Verma M; Gupta S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 225():985-6. PubMed ID: 27332444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nurses' expectations and perceptions of a redesigned Electronic Health Record.
    Gonzalez Z; Recondo F; Sommer J; Schachner B; Garcia G; Luna D; Benítez S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 210():374-8. PubMed ID: 25991169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Technology-Assisted Virtual Consultation for Medical Imaging.
    Rosenkrantz AB; Sherwin J; Prithiani CP; Ostrow D; Recht MP
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Aug; 13(8):995-1002. PubMed ID: 27084068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Barriers to using eHealth data for clinical performance feedback in Malawi: A case study.
    Landis-Lewis Z; Manjomo R; Gadabu OJ; Kam M; Simwaka BN; Zickmund SL; Chimbwandira F; Douglas GP; Jacobson RS
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Oct; 84(10):868-75. PubMed ID: 26238704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Usability Evaluation of a Medication Reconciliation and Allergy Review (MRAR) Kiosk: A Methodological Approach for Analyzing User Interactions.
    Lesselroth B; Adams K; Tallett S; Ragland S; Church V; Borycki EM; Kushniruk A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 218():61-67. PubMed ID: 26262528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the Styrian personal eXray-record.
    Neurohr P; Seifter P
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 212():198-205. PubMed ID: 26063277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the payoff from meaningful use of EHRs. More physicians are using electronic health records, but opinions are mixed over the value of digitization.
    Bendix J
    Med Econ; 2014 Jan; 91(2):72, 74-6. PubMed ID: 25211963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. SATISFACTION with EHR SYSTEMS GROWS AMONG PHYSICIANS.
    Terry K
    Med Econ; 2014 Oct; 91(19):24-6, 28, 30 passim. PubMed ID: 26242086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.