These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

688 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26810924)

  • 1. Assessing the Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Calibrated With Capillary Values Using Capillary or Venous Glucose Levels as a Reference.
    Andelin M; Kropff J; Matuleviciene V; Joseph JI; Attvall S; Theodorsson E; Hirsch IB; Imberg H; Dahlqvist S; Klonoff D; Haraldsson B; DeVries JH; Lind M
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 Jul; 10(4):876-84. PubMed ID: 26810924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Venous, Arterialized-Venous, or Capillary Glucose Reference Measurements for the Accuracy Assessment of a Continuous Glucose Monitoring System.
    Kropff J; van Steen SC; deGraaff P; Chan MW; van Amstel RBE; DeVries JH
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2017 Nov; 19(11):609-617. PubMed ID: 28829160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of a Factory-Calibrated, Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System During 10 Days of Use in Youth and Adults with Diabetes.
    Wadwa RP; Laffel LM; Shah VN; Garg SK
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Jun; 20(6):395-402. PubMed ID: 29901421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy assessment of online glucose monitoring by a subcutaneous enzymatic glucose sensor during exercise in patients with type 1 diabetes treated by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion.
    Radermecker RP; Fayolle C; Brun JF; Bringer J; Renard E
    Diabetes Metab; 2013 May; 39(3):258-62. PubMed ID: 23522730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of time point of calibration on accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring in individuals with type 1 diabetes.
    Zueger T; Diem P; Mougiakakou S; Stettler C
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Jul; 14(7):583-8. PubMed ID: 22512266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring during differing exercise conditions.
    Bally L; Zueger T; Pasi N; Carlos C; Paganini D; Stettler C
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2016 Feb; 112():1-5. PubMed ID: 26739116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance of a Factory-Calibrated Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Utilizing an Automated Sensor Applicator.
    Shah VN; Laffel LM; Wadwa RP; Garg SK
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Jun; 20(6):428-433. PubMed ID: 29923775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of a Factory-Calibrated, Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Pediatric Participants With Type 1 Diabetes.
    Welsh JB; Zhang X; Puhr SA; Johnson TK; Walker TC; Balo AK; Price D
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2019 Mar; 13(2):254-258. PubMed ID: 30198331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Clinical Trial of the Accuracy and Treatment Experience of the Flash Glucose Monitor FreeStyle Libre in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes.
    Ólafsdóttir AF; Attvall S; Sandgren U; Dahlqvist S; Pivodic A; Skrtic S; Theodorsson E; Lind M
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2017 Mar; 19(3):164-172. PubMed ID: 28263665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hypoglycemic Accuracy and Improved Low Glucose Alerts of the Latest Dexcom G4 Platinum Continuous Glucose Monitoring System.
    Peyser TA; Nakamura K; Price D; Bohnett LC; Hirsch IB; Balo A
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Aug; 17(8):548-54. PubMed ID: 25961446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance evaluation of a continuous glucose monitoring system under conditions similar to daily life.
    Pleus S; Schmid C; Link M; Zschornack E; Klötzer HM; Haug C; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Jul; 7(4):833-41. PubMed ID: 23911164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of a portable glucose meter and of a Continuous Glucose Monitoring device used at home by patients with type 1 diabetes.
    Francescato MP; Geat M; Stel G; Cauci S
    Clin Chim Acta; 2012 Jan; 413(1-2):312-8. PubMed ID: 22032826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rate-of-Change Dependence of the Performance of Two CGM Systems During Induced Glucose Swings.
    Pleus S; Schoemaker M; Morgenstern K; Schmelzeisen-Redeker G; Haug C; Link M; Zschornack E; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 9(4):801-7. PubMed ID: 25852074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improved Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems in Pediatric Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: Results from Two Studies.
    Laffel L
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2016 Feb; 18 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S223-33. PubMed ID: 26784126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Significance and Reliability of MARD for the Accuracy of CGM Systems.
    Reiterer F; Polterauer P; Schoemaker M; Schmelzeisen-Redecker G; Freckmann G; Heinemann L; Del Re L
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Jan; 11(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 27566735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lag Time Remains with Newer Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Technology During Aerobic Exercise in Adults Living with Type 1 Diabetes.
    Zaharieva DP; Turksoy K; McGaugh SM; Pooni R; Vienneau T; Ly T; Riddell MC
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2019 Jun; 21(6):313-321. PubMed ID: 31059282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Measurements in Normo-Glycemic Individuals.
    Akintola AA; Noordam R; Jansen SW; de Craen AJ; Ballieux BE; Cobbaert CM; Mooijaart SP; Pijl H; Westendorp RG; van Heemst D
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139973. PubMed ID: 26445499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical accuracy of a continuous glucose monitoring system with an advanced algorithm.
    Bailey TS; Chang A; Christiansen M
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Mar; 9(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 25370149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Two Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems, Dexcom G4 Platinum and Medtronic Paradigm Veo Enlite System, at Rest and During Exercise.
    Taleb N; Emami A; Suppere C; Messier V; Legault L; Chiasson JL; Rabasa-Lhoret R; Haidar A
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2016 Sep; 18(9):561-7. PubMed ID: 27356172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance evaluation of three continuous glucose monitoring systems: comparison of six sensors per subject in parallel.
    Freckmann G; Pleus S; Link M; Zschornack E; Klötzer HM; Haug C
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Jul; 7(4):842-53. PubMed ID: 23911165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.