171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26810981)
1. Patient Vertical Centering and Correlation with Radiation Output in Adult Abdominopelvic CT.
Cheng PM
J Digit Imaging; 2016 Aug; 29(4):428-37. PubMed ID: 26810981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effects of patient positioning when interpreting CT dose metrics: A phantom study.
Marsh RM; Silosky MS
Med Phys; 2017 Apr; 44(4):1514-1524. PubMed ID: 28133763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vertical off-centering affects organ dose in chest CT: Evidence from Monte Carlo simulations in anthropomorphic phantoms.
Saltybaeva N; Alkadhi H
Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 44(11):5697-5704. PubMed ID: 28817195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of patient centering in CT on organ dose and the effect of using a positioning compensation system: Evidence from OSLD measurements in postmortem subjects.
Barreto I; Lamoureux R; Olguin C; Quails N; Correa N; Rill L; Arreola M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 20(6):141-151. PubMed ID: 31050136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of patient centering on patient dose and image noise in chest CT.
Kaasalainen T; Palmu K; Reijonen V; Kortesniemi M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jul; 203(1):123-30. PubMed ID: 24951205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Precise and Automatic Patient Positioning in Computed Tomography: Avatar Modeling of the Patient Surface Using a 3-Dimensional Camera.
Saltybaeva N; Schmidt B; Wimmer A; Flohr T; Alkadhi H
Invest Radiol; 2018 Nov; 53(11):641-646. PubMed ID: 29762259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Vertical Off-Centering in Reduced Dose Chest-CT: Impact on Effective Dose and Image Noise Values.
Eberhard M; Blüthgen C; Barth BK; Frauenfelder T; Saltybaeva N; Martini K
Acad Radiol; 2020 Apr; 27(4):508-517. PubMed ID: 31358357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of mis-centering on radiation dose during CT head examination: A phantom study.
Isa INC; Rahmat SMS; Dom SM; Kayun Z; Karim MKA
J Xray Sci Technol; 2019; 27(4):631-639. PubMed ID: 31205011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective estimation of organ dose in CT under tube current modulation.
Tian X; Li X; Segars WP; Frush DP; Samei E
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1575-85. PubMed ID: 25832048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automatic calculation of patient size metrics in computed tomography: What level of computational accuracy do we need?
Sarmento S; Mendes B; Gouvêa M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):218-227. PubMed ID: 29265700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tailoring CT Dose to Patient Size: Implementation of the Updated 2017 ACR Size-specific Diagnostic Reference Levels.
Klosterkemper Y; Appel E; Thomas C; Bethge OT; Aissa J; Kröpil P; Antoch G; Boos J
Acad Radiol; 2018 Dec; 25(12):1624-1631. PubMed ID: 29580788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Variability of MDCT dose due to technologist performance: impact of posteroanterior versus anteroposterior localizer image and table height with use of automated tube current modulation.
Harri PA; Moreno CC; Nelson RC; Fani N; Small WC; Duong PA; Tang X; Applegate KE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Aug; 203(2):377-86. PubMed ID: 25055274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dependency of prescribed CT dose on table height, patient size, and localizer acquisition for one clinical MDCT.
Winslow J; Zhang Y; Koweek L; Samei E
Phys Med; 2018 Nov; 55():56-60. PubMed ID: 30471820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterization of radiation dose from tube current modulated CT examinations with considerations of both patient size and variable tube current.
Li X; Yang K; Liu B
Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5413-5422. PubMed ID: 28681439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How patient off-centering impacts organ dose and image noise in pediatric head and thoracoabdominal CT.
Euler A; Saltybaeva N; Alkadhi H
Eur Radiol; 2019 Dec; 29(12):6790-6793. PubMed ID: 31278575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of vertical centering and scout direction on automatic tube voltage selection in chest CT: a preliminary phantom study on two different CT equipments.
Kaasalainen T; Mäkelä T; Kortesniemi M
Eur J Radiol Open; 2019; 6():24-32. PubMed ID: 30619916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of patient centering on CT dose and image noise.
Toth T; Ge Z; Daly MP
Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):3093-101. PubMed ID: 17822016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of automatic tube potential selection on radiation dose index, image quality, and lesion detectability in pediatric abdominopelvic CT and CTA: a phantom study.
Brinkley MF; Ramirez-Giraldo JC; Samei E; Frush DJ; Choudhury KR; Wilson JM; Christianson OI; Frush DP
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jan; 26(1):157-66. PubMed ID: 25991484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of automatic and manual compensation methods for the calculation of tube currents during off-centered patient positioning with a noise-based automatic exposure control system in computed tomography.
Furukawa Y; Matsubara K; Tsutsumi Y
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2021 Sep; 44(3):823-832. PubMed ID: 34297309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Point Organ Radiation Dose in Abdominal CT: Effect of Patient Off-Centering in an Experimental Human Cadaver Study.
Ali Khawaja RD; Singh S; Padole A; Otrakji A; Lira D; Zhang D; Liu B; Primak A; Xu G; Kalra MK
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Aug; 175(4):440-449. PubMed ID: 28074019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
