218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26810994)
21. The Feasibility and Usability of a Ranking Tool to Elicit Patient Preferences for the Treatment of Trigger Finger.
Shapiro LM; Eppler SL; Kamal RN
J Hand Surg Am; 2019 Jun; 44(6):480-486.e1. PubMed ID: 30797655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Using Best-Worst Scaling to Measure Caregiver Preferences for Managing their Child's ADHD: A Pilot Study.
dosReis S; Ng X; Frosch E; Reeves G; Cunningham C; Bridges JF
Patient; 2015 Oct; 8(5):423-31. PubMed ID: 25392024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Three-year survival rates for all consecutive heart-only and lung-only transplants performed in Eurotransplant, 1997-1999.
Smits JM; Vanhaecke J; Haverich A; de Vries E; Smith M; Rutgrink E; Ramsoebhag A; Hop A; Persijn G; Laufer G
Clin Transpl; 2003; ():89-100. PubMed ID: 15387100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Community preferences for the allocation of donor organs for transplantation: a discrete choice study.
Howard K; Jan S; Rose JM; Wong G; Irving M; Tong A; Craig JC; Chadban S; Allen RD; Cass A
Transplantation; 2015 Mar; 99(3):560-7. PubMed ID: 25700169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Conducting a Discrete-Choice Experiment Study Following Recommendations for Good Research Practices: An Application for Eliciting Patient Preferences for Diabetes Treatments.
Janssen EM; Hauber AB; Bridges JFP
Value Health; 2018 Jan; 21(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 29304942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Patient preferences for cancer screening in chronic kidney disease: a best-worst scaling survey.
James LJ; Wong G; Tong A; Craig JC; Howard K; Howell M
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2022 Nov; 37(12):2449-2456. PubMed ID: 34958393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Outcome Preferences in Patients With Noninfectious Uveitis: Results of a Best-Worst Scaling Study.
Yu T; Holbrook JT; Thorne JE; Flynn TN; Van Natta ML; Puhan MA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Oct; 56(11):6864-72. PubMed ID: 26501236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Empirical Investigation of Ranking vs Best-Worst Scaling Generated Preferences for Attributes of Quality of Life: One and the Same or Differentiable?
Ratcliffe J; Kaambwa B; Hutchinson C; Lancsar E
Patient; 2020 Jun; 13(3):307-315. PubMed ID: 31930462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Adolescent valuation of CARIES-QC-U: a child-centred preference-based measure of dental caries.
Rogers HJ; Sagabiel J; Marshman Z; Rodd HD; Rowen D
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2022 Feb; 20(1):18. PubMed ID: 35115013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparing the Preferences of Patients and the General Public for Treatment Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
Crossnohere NL; Janse S; Janssen E; Bridges JFP
Patient; 2021 Jan; 14(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 32885395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Using best-worst scaling choice experiments to elicit the most important domains of health for health-related quality of life in Singapore.
Uy EJB; Bautista DC; Xin X; Cheung YB; Thio ST; Thumboo J
PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0189687. PubMed ID: 29420564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Preferences for aspects of antenatal and newborn screening: a systematic review.
Vass CM; Georgsson S; Ulph F; Payne K
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Apr; 19(1):131. PubMed ID: 30991967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A community-engaged approach to quantifying caregiver preferences for the benefits and risks of emerging therapies for Duchenne muscular dystrophy.
Peay HL; Hollin I; Fischer R; Bridges JF
Clin Ther; 2014 May; 36(5):624-37. PubMed ID: 24852596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Eliciting preferences for priority setting in genetic testing: a pilot study comparing best-worst scaling and discrete-choice experiments.
Severin F; Schmidtke J; Mühlbacher A; Rogowski WH
Eur J Hum Genet; 2013 Nov; 21(11):1202-8. PubMed ID: 23486538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Outcomes of social care for adults: developing a preference-weighted measure.
Netten A; Burge P; Malley J; Potoglou D; Towers AM; Brazier J; Flynn T; Forder J; Wall B
Health Technol Assess; 2012; 16(16):1-166. PubMed ID: 22459668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Valuing the Child Health Utility 9D: Using profile case best worst scaling methods to develop a new adolescent specific scoring algorithm.
Ratcliffe J; Huynh E; Chen G; Stevens K; Swait J; Brazier J; Sawyer M; Roberts R; Flynn T
Soc Sci Med; 2016 May; 157():48-59. PubMed ID: 27060541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Treatment preferences of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: a discrete-choice experiment.
Hazlewood GS; Bombardier C; Tomlinson G; Thorne C; Bykerk VP; Thompson A; Tin D; Marshall DA
Rheumatology (Oxford); 2016 Nov; 55(11):1959-1968. PubMed ID: 27477807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Patient and caregiver preferences for the potential benefits and risks of a seizure forecasting device: A best-worst scaling.
Janse SA; Dumanis SB; Huwig T; Hyman S; Fureman BE; Bridges JFP
Epilepsy Behav; 2019 Jul; 96():183-191. PubMed ID: 31150998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A multi-factor analysis of kidney regraft outcomes.
Gjertson DW
Clin Transpl; 2002; ():335-49. PubMed ID: 12971460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Patient centered decision making: use of conjoint analysis to determine risk-benefit trade-offs for preference sensitive treatment choices.
Wilson L; Loucks A; Bui C; Gipson G; Zhong L; Schwartzburg A; Crabtree E; Goodin D; Waubant E; McCulloch C
J Neurol Sci; 2014 Sep; 344(1-2):80-7. PubMed ID: 25037284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
