632 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26811112)
1. Predictors of vaginal mesh exposure after midurethral sling placement: a case-control study.
Linder BJ; El-Nashar SA; Carranza Leon DA; Trabuco EC
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1321-6. PubMed ID: 26811112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk factors for mesh erosion after vaginal sling procedures for urinary incontinence.
Kokanali MK; Doğanay M; Aksakal O; Cavkaytar S; Topçu HO; Özer İ
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Jun; 177():146-50. PubMed ID: 24793930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term effectiveness and safety of open Burch colposuspension vs retropubic midurethral sling for stress urinary incontinence-results from a large comparative study.
Karmakar D; Dwyer PL; Murray C; Schierlitz L; Dykes N; Zilberlicht A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 224(6):593.e1-593.e8. PubMed ID: 33316277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Indications and risk factors for midurethral sling revision.
Unger CA; Rizzo AE; Ridgeway B
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Jan; 27(1):117-22. PubMed ID: 26134541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Incontinence rates after midurethral sling revision for vaginal exposure or pain.
Jambusaria LH; Heft J; Reynolds WS; Dmochowski R; Biller DH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 215(6):764.e1-764.e5. PubMed ID: 27448731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the local carcinogenic potential of mesh used in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.
Linder BJ; Trabuco EC; Carranza DA; Gebhart JB; Klingele CJ; Occhino JA
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1333-6. PubMed ID: 26864666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term Risk of Reoperation After Synthetic Mesh Midurethral Sling Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 134(5):1047-1055. PubMed ID: 31599825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preoperative vaginal estrogen and midurethral sling exposure: a retrospective cohort study.
Cadish LA; West EH; Sisto J; Longoria T; Bebchuk JD; Whitcomb EL
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Mar; 27(3):413-7. PubMed ID: 26264475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Association Between the Amount of Vaginal Mesh Used With Mesh Erosions and Repeated Surgery After Repairing Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Chughtai B; Barber MD; Mao J; Forde JC; Normand ST; Sedrakyan A
JAMA Surg; 2017 Mar; 152(3):257-263. PubMed ID: 27902825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Vaginal erosion after hybrid midurethral sling placement.
Bong GW; Rovner ES
Urology; 2006 Dec; 68(6):1343.e13-4. PubMed ID: 17141829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic retropubic sling at the time of vaginal prolapse surgery.
Mou T; Cadish LA; Gray EL; Bretschneider CE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Sep; 227(3):471.e1-471.e7. PubMed ID: 35644248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictors of early postoperative voiding dysfunction and other complications following a midurethral sling.
Ripperda CM; Kowalski JT; Chaudhry ZQ; Mahal AS; Lanzer J; Noor N; Good MM; Hynan LS; Jeppson PC; Rahn DD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):656.e1-656.e6. PubMed ID: 27319367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sling Plication for Failed Midurethral Sling Procedures: A Case Series.
Maheshwari D; Jones K; Solomon E; Harmanli O
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(1):e4-e6. PubMed ID: 30180049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Serious complications and recurrences after retropubic vs transobturator midurethral sling procedures for 2682 patients in the VIGI-MESH register.
Armengaud C; Fauconnier A; Drioueche H; Campagne Loiseau S; De Tayrac R; Saussine C; Panel L; Cosson M; Deffieux X; Lucot JP; Pizzoferrato AC; Ferry P; Vidart A; Thubert T; Capon G; Debodinance P; Gauthier T; Koebele A; Salet-Lizee D; Hermieu JF; Game X; Ramanah R; Lamblin G; Lecornet E; Carlier-Guérin C; Chartier-Kastler E; Fritel X
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Apr; 230(4):428.e1-428.e13. PubMed ID: 38008151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Serious complications from a single-incision midurethral sling placement.
Chung C; Kingman T; Tsai L; Bird E
Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Feb; 119(2 Pt 2):464-466. PubMed ID: 22270440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can Urodynamic Parameters Predict Sling Revision for Voiding Dysfunction in Women Undergoing Synthetic Midurethral Sling Placement?
Linder BJ; Trabuco EC; Gebhart JB; Klingele CJ; Occhino JA; Elliott DS; Lightner DJ
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(1):63-66. PubMed ID: 29135810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Management of the Exposed or Perforated Midurethral Sling.
Giusto LL; Zahner PM; Goldman HB
Urol Clin North Am; 2019 Feb; 46(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 30466700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surgeon volume and reoperation risk after midurethral sling surgery.
Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 221(5):523.e1-523.e8. PubMed ID: 31526790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Midurethral Fascial "Sling on a String": An Alternative to Midurethral Synthetic Tapes in the Era of Mesh Complications.
Osman NI; Hillary CJ; Mangera A; Aldamanhoori R; Inman RD; Chapple CR
Eur Urol; 2018 Aug; 74(2):191-196. PubMed ID: 29803585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of patient and technical factors associated with midurethral sling mesh exposure and perforation.
Osborn DJ; Dmochowski RR; Harris CJ; Danford JJ; Kaufman MR; Mock S; Kit LC; McCormick B; Reynolds WS
Int J Urol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1167-70. PubMed ID: 25039945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
