These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26811365)

  • 1. Incorporating ethical principles into clinical research protocols: a tool for protocol writers and ethics committees.
    Li RH; Wacholtz MC; Barnes M; Boggs L; Callery-D'Amico S; Davis A; Digilova A; Forster D; Heffernan K; Luthin M; Lynch HF; McNair L; Miller JE; Murphy J; Van Campen L; Wilenzick M; Wolf D; Woolston C; Aldinger C; Bierer BE
    J Med Ethics; 2016 Apr; 42(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 26811365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ethical issues in research involving minority populations: the process and outcomes of protocol review by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Thailand.
    Adams P; Wongwit W; Pengsaa K; Khusmith S; Fungladda W; Chaiyaphan W; Limphattharacharoen C; Prakobtham S; Kaewkungwal J
    BMC Med Ethics; 2013 Sep; 14():33. PubMed ID: 24025591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ethics review of studies during public health emergencies - the experience of the WHO ethics review committee during the Ebola virus disease epidemic.
    Alirol E; Kuesel AC; Guraiib MM; de la Fuente-Núñez V; Saxena A; Gomes MF
    BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Jun; 18(1):43. PubMed ID: 28651650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microbicide research in developing countries: have we given the ethical concerns due consideration?
    Moodley K
    BMC Med Ethics; 2007 Sep; 8():10. PubMed ID: 17877834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Collaborative international research: ethical and regulatory issues pertaining to human biological materials at a South African institutional research ethics committee.
    Sathar A; Dhai A; van der Linde S
    Dev World Bioeth; 2014 Dec; 14(3):150-7. PubMed ID: 23724945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. To research (or not) that is the question: ethical issues in research when medical care is disrupted by political action: a case study from Eldoret, Kenya.
    House DR; Marete I; Meslin EM
    J Med Ethics; 2016 Jan; 42(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 26474601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do research ethics committees identify process errors in applications for ethical approval?
    Angell E; Dixon-Woods M
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Feb; 35(2):130-2. PubMed ID: 19181888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Research ethics committees in Japan: A perspective from thirty years of experience at Tokushima University.
    Yanagawa H; Katashima R; Takeda N
    J Med Invest; 2015; 62(3-4):114-8. PubMed ID: 26399332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stepped-wedge trials should be classified as research for the purpose of ethical review.
    Hemming K; Taljaard M; Marshall T; Goldstein CE; Weijer C
    Clin Trials; 2019 Dec; 16(6):580-588. PubMed ID: 31818147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Moral imperialism and multi-centric clinical trials in peripheral countries.
    Garrafa V; Lorenzo C
    Cad Saude Publica; 2008 Oct; 24(10):2219-26. PubMed ID: 18949224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Shortcomings of protocols of drug trials in relation to sponsorship as identified by Research Ethics Committees: analysis of comments raised during ethical review.
    van Lent M; Rongen GA; Out HJ
    BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Dec; 15():83. PubMed ID: 25490963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Research Ethics Committees' Oversight of Biomedical Research in South Africa: A Thematic Analysis of Ethical Issues Raised During Ethics Review of Non-Expedited Protocols.
    Silaigwana B; Wassenaar D
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2019 Apr; 14(2):107-116. PubMed ID: 30678521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Developing a framework for the ethical design and conduct of pragmatic trials in healthcare: a mixed methods research protocol.
    Taljaard M; Weijer C; Grimshaw JM; Ali A; Brehaut JC; Campbell MK; Carroll K; Edwards S; Eldridge S; Forrest CB; Giraudeau B; Goldstein CE; Graham ID; Hemming K; Hey SP; Horn AR; Jairath V; Klassen TP; London AJ; Marlin S; Marshall JC; McIntyre L; McKenzie JE; Nicholls SG; Alison Paprica P; Zwarenstein M; Fergusson DA
    Trials; 2018 Sep; 19(1):525. PubMed ID: 30261933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ethics approval: responsibilities of journal editors, authors and research ethics committees.
    Bain LE
    Pan Afr Med J; 2017; 28():200. PubMed ID: 29610638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An investigator's view of hospital ethics committees.
    Wing LM
    Med J Aust; 1988 Sep; 149(5):264, 266. PubMed ID: 3412218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Moral reasoning in biomedical research protocols.
    Holm S
    Scand J Soc Med; 1994 Jun; 22(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 8091159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Problematic protocols: An overview of medical research protocols not approved by the LUMC medical ethics review committee.
    Tersmette DG; Engberts DP
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2017; 8(1):52-57. PubMed ID: 28949866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Research ethics review at University Eduardo Mondlane (UEM)/Maputo Central Hospital, Mozambique (2013-2016): a descriptive analysis of the start-up of a new research ethics committee (REC).
    Sacarlal J; Muchanga V; Mabutana C; Mabui M; Mariamo A; Cuamba AJ; Fumo LA; Silveira J; Heitman E; Moon TD
    BMC Med Ethics; 2018 May; 19(1):37. PubMed ID: 29792193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Drug trials and the role of ethics committees: a regulator's point of view.
    Hall RC
    Med J Aust; 1988 Sep; 149(5):262-4. PubMed ID: 3412217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.