These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26811541)

  • 1. Reporting and design elements of audit and feedback interventions: a secondary review.
    Colquhoun H; Michie S; Sales A; Ivers N; Grimshaw JM; Carroll K; Chalifoux M; Eva K; Brehaut J
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2017 Jan; 26(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 26811541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Theory-based and evidence-based design of audit and feedback programmes: examples from two clinical intervention studies.
    Hysong SJ; Kell HJ; Petersen LA; Campbell BA; Trautner BW
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2017 Apr; 26(4):323-334. PubMed ID: 27288054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Facilitating action planning within audit and feedback interventions: a mixed-methods process evaluation of an action implementation toolbox in intensive care.
    Gude WT; Roos-Blom MJ; van der Veer SN; Dongelmans DA; de Jonge E; Peek N; de Keizer NF
    Implement Sci; 2019 Sep; 14(1):90. PubMed ID: 31533841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Audit and feedback interventions to improve endoscopist performance: Principles and effectiveness.
    Tinmouth J; Patel J; Hilsden RJ; Ivers N; Llovet D
    Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol; 2016 Jun; 30(3):473-85. PubMed ID: 27345652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Beyond quality improvement: exploring why primary care teams engage in a voluntary audit and feedback program.
    Wagner DJ; Durbin J; Barnsley J; Ivers NM
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Dec; 17(1):803. PubMed ID: 29197382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Data for Improvement and Clinical Excellence: a report of an interrupted time series trial of feedback in home care.
    Fraser KD; Sales AE; Baylon MAB; Schalm C; Miklavcic JJ
    Implement Sci; 2017 May; 12(1):66. PubMed ID: 28521750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A multidimensional approach to assessing intervention fidelity in a process evaluation of audit and feedback interventions to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions: a study protocol.
    Lorencatto F; Gould NJ; McIntyre SA; During C; Bird J; Walwyn R; Cicero R; Glidewell L; Hartley S; Stanworth SJ; Foy R; Grimshaw JM; Michie S; Francis JJ;
    Implement Sci; 2016 Dec; 11(1):163. PubMed ID: 27955683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implementation of an audit with feedback knowledge translation intervention to promote medication error reporting in health care: a protocol.
    Hutchinson AM; Sales AE; Brotto V; Bucknall TK
    Implement Sci; 2015 May; 10():70. PubMed ID: 25986004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measured and perceived effects of audit and feedback on nursing performance: a mixed methods systematic review protocol.
    Dufour É; Duhoux A; Bolduc J
    Syst Rev; 2019 Feb; 8(1):38. PubMed ID: 30709416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Calgary Audit and Feedback Framework: a practical, evidence-informed approach for the design and implementation of socially constructed learning interventions using audit and group feedback.
    Cooke LJ; Duncan D; Rivera L; Dowling SK; Symonds C; Armson H
    Implement Sci; 2018 Oct; 13(1):136. PubMed ID: 30376848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impetus to change: a multi-site qualitative exploration of the national audit of dementia.
    Sykes M; Thomson R; Kolehmainen N; Allan L; Finch T
    Implement Sci; 2020 Jun; 15(1):45. PubMed ID: 32552860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reinvigorating stagnant science: implementation laboratories and a meta-laboratory to efficiently advance the science of audit and feedback.
    Grimshaw JM; Ivers N; Linklater S; Foy R; Francis JJ; Gude WT; Hysong SJ;
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2019 May; 28(5):416-423. PubMed ID: 30852557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exploring the content and delivery of feedback facilitation co-interventions: a systematic review.
    Sykes M; Rosenberg-Yunger ZRS; Quigley M; Gupta L; Thomas O; Robinson L; Caulfield K; Ivers N; Alderson S
    Implement Sci; 2024 May; 19(1):37. PubMed ID: 38807219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Understanding feedback report uptake: process evaluation findings from a 13-month feedback intervention in long-term care settings.
    Sales AE; Fraser K; Baylon MA; O'Rourke HM; Gao G; Bucknall T; Maisey S
    Implement Sci; 2015 Feb; 10():20. PubMed ID: 25884696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Audit and feedback in mental healthcare: staff experiences.
    Pedersen MS; Landheim A; Møller M; Lien L
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 2018 Aug; 31(7):822-833. PubMed ID: 30354880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Audit & Feedback: how it works.].
    Di Blasio N; Acampora A; Angelici L; Pagano E; Ciccone G
    Recenti Prog Med; 2022 Dec; 113(12):733-738. PubMed ID: 36420849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Informing the research agenda for optimizing audit and feedback interventions: results of a prioritization exercise.
    Colquhoun HL; Carroll K; Eva KW; Grimshaw JM; Ivers N; Michie S; Brehaut JC
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Jan; 21(1):20. PubMed ID: 33435873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using a behaviour change techniques taxonomy to identify active ingredients within trials of implementation interventions for diabetes care.
    Presseau J; Ivers NM; Newham JJ; Knittle K; Danko KJ; Grimshaw JM
    Implement Sci; 2015 Apr; 10():55. PubMed ID: 25900104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do medical specialists accept claims-based Audit and Feedback for quality improvement? A focus group study.
    de Weerdt V; Ybema S; Repping S; van der Hijden E; Willems H
    BMJ Open; 2024 Apr; 14(4):e081063. PubMed ID: 38589258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Case for Conceptual and Computable Cross-Fertilization Between Audit and Feedback and Clinical Decision Support.
    Brown B; Peek N; Buchan I
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 216():419-23. PubMed ID: 26262084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.