These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26812416)

  • 1. Towards deep inclusion for equity-oriented health research priority-setting: A working model.
    Pratt B; Merritt M; Hyder AA
    Soc Sci Med; 2016 Feb; 151():215-24. PubMed ID: 26812416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient and public engagement in priority setting: A systematic rapid review of the literature.
    Manafò E; Petermann L; Vandall-Walker V; Mason-Lai P
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193579. PubMed ID: 29499043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Priorities for research to take forward the health equity policy agenda.
    Ostlin P; Braveman P; Dachs N; ;
    Bull World Health Organ; 2005 Dec; 83(12):948-53. PubMed ID: 16462988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Towards inclusive priority-setting for global health research projects: recommendations for sharing power with communities.
    Pratt B
    Health Policy Plan; 2019 Jun; 34(5):346-357. PubMed ID: 31168568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An equity lens can ensure an equity-oriented approach to agenda setting and priority setting of Cochrane Reviews.
    Nasser M; Ueffing E; Welch V; Tugwell P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 May; 66(5):511-21. PubMed ID: 23477991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can frameworks inform knowledge about health policy processes? Reviewing health policy papers on agenda setting and testing them against a specific priority-setting framework.
    Walt G; Gilson L
    Health Policy Plan; 2014 Dec; 29 Suppl 3():iii6-22. PubMed ID: 25435537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Research priority setting for health policy and health systems strengthening in Nigeria: the policymakers and stakeholders perspective and involvement.
    Uneke CJ; Ezeoha AE; Ndukwe CD; Oyibo PG; Onwe F; Aulakh BK
    Pan Afr Med J; 2013; 16():10. PubMed ID: 24570781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stakeholder views on criteria and processes for priority setting in Norway: a qualitative study.
    Aidem JM
    Health Policy; 2017 Jun; 121(6):683-690. PubMed ID: 28433324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Social values and health priority setting in Australia: an analysis applied to the context of health technology assessment.
    Whitty JA; Littlejohns P
    Health Policy; 2015 Feb; 119(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 25267072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Priority setting for health research: lessons from developing countries. The Working Group on Priority Setting.
    Health Policy Plan; 2000 Jun; 15(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 10837035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sexual and reproductive health: challenges for priority-setting in Ghana's health reforms.
    Mayhew SH; Adjei S
    Health Policy Plan; 2004 Oct; 19 Suppl 1():i50-i61. PubMed ID: 15452015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Consensus and contention in the priority setting process: examining the health sector in Uganda.
    Colenbrander S; Birungi C; Mbonye AK
    Health Policy Plan; 2015 Jun; 30(5):555-65. PubMed ID: 24846947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Eliciting policymakers' and stakeholders' opinions to help shape health system research priorities in the Middle East and North Africa region.
    El-Jardali F; Makhoul J; Jamal D; Ranson MK; Kronfol NM; Tchaghchagian V
    Health Policy Plan; 2010 Jan; 25(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 19948770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Applying a global justice lens to health systems research ethics: an initial exploration.
    Pratt B; Hyder AA
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2015 Mar; 25(1):35-66. PubMed ID: 25843119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness.
    Baltussen R; Jansen MP; Mikkelsen E; Tromp N; Hontelez J; Bijlmakers L; Van der Wilt GJ
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2016 Nov; 5(11):615-618. PubMed ID: 27801355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Equity in health and health technology assessment in Chile].
    Espinoza MA; Cabieses B
    Rev Med Chil; 2014 Jan; 142 Suppl 1():S45-9. PubMed ID: 24861180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implementing priority setting frameworks: Insights from leading researchers.
    Angell B; Pares J; Mooney G
    Health Policy; 2016 Dec; 120(12):1389-1394. PubMed ID: 27839887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How can we improve priority-setting for investments in health research? A case study of tuberculosis.
    Khan MS; Rahman-Shepherd A; Painter H; Fletcher H
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2019 Jul; 17(1):68. PubMed ID: 31324187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving equity in health: a research agenda.
    Starfield B
    Int J Health Serv; 2001; 31(3):545-66. PubMed ID: 11562005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Constructing citizen engagement in health research priority-setting to attend to dynamics of power and difference.
    Pratt B
    Dev World Bioeth; 2019 Mar; 19(1):45-60. PubMed ID: 29940079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.