These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26812536)

  • 1. Common Misconceptions Concerning The Analysis Of Covariance.
    Overall JE; Woodward JA
    Multivariate Behav Res; 1977 Apr; 12(2):171-86. PubMed ID: 26812536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of covariance in parallel-group clinical trials with pretreatment baselines.
    Crager MR
    Biometrics; 1987 Dec; 43(4):895-901. PubMed ID: 3427174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with fallible covariates.
    Culpepper SA; Aguinis H
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Jun; 16(2):166-78. PubMed ID: 21517178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nonrandom assignment and the analysis of covariance in aging research.
    Camp CJ; Maxwell SE
    Exp Aging Res; 1981; 7(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 7274323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When does measurement error in covariates impact causal effect estimates? Analytic derivations of different scenarios and an empirical illustration.
    Sengewald MA; Steiner PM; Pohl S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 May; 72(2):244-270. PubMed ID: 30345554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A strategy to evaluate a covariate by group interaction in an analysis of covariance.
    Leon AC; Portera L; Lowell K; Rheinheimer D
    Psychopharmacol Bull; 1998; 34(4):805-9. PubMed ID: 10513456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with difference scores.
    Jamieson J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2004 May; 52(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 15094250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A cautionary note on the use of the Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) in classification designs with and without within-subject factors.
    Schneider BA; Avivi-Reich M; Mozuraitis M
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():474. PubMed ID: 25954230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact Evaluation Using Analysis of Covariance With Error-Prone Covariates That Violate Surrogacy.
    Lockwood JR; McCaffrey DF
    Eval Rev; 2019 Dec; 43(6):335-369. PubMed ID: 31578089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nonparametric analysis of covariance for comparing change in randomized studies with baseline values subject to error.
    Knoke JD
    Biometrics; 1991 Jun; 47(2):523-33. PubMed ID: 1912259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Change from baseline and analysis of covariance revisited.
    Senn S
    Stat Med; 2006 Dec; 25(24):4334-44. PubMed ID: 16921578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ANCOVA Versus CHANGE From Baseline in Nonrandomized Studies: The Difference.
    van Breukelen GJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2013 Nov; 48(6):895-922. PubMed ID: 26745598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A measurement error model with a Poisson distributed surrogate.
    Li L; Palta M; Shao J
    Stat Med; 2004 Aug; 23(16):2527-36. PubMed ID: 15287082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Linear mixed models for replication data to efficiently allow for covariate measurement error.
    Bartlett JW; De Stavola BL; Frost C
    Stat Med; 2009 Nov; 28(25):3158-78. PubMed ID: 19777493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Clinical research XIX. From clinical judgment to analysis of covariance].
    Pérez-Rodríguez M; Palacios-Cruz L; Moreno J; Rivas-Ruiz R; Talavera JO
    Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc; 2014; 52(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 24625487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Issues in use of SAS PROC.MIXED to test the significance of treatment effects in controlled clinical trials.
    Ahn C; Tonidandel S; Overall JE
    J Biopharm Stat; 2000 May; 10(2):265-86. PubMed ID: 10803729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of subset selection and analysis of covariance for the adjustment of confounders.
    Little RJ; An H; Johanns J; Giordani B
    Psychol Methods; 2000 Dec; 5(4):459-76. PubMed ID: 11194208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Compensation and Amplification of Attenuation Bias in Causal Effect Estimates.
    Sengewald MA; Pohl S
    Psychometrika; 2019 Jun; 84(2):589-610. PubMed ID: 30915587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of covariance with pre-treatment measurements in randomized trials: comparison of equal and unequal slopes.
    Funatogawa I; Funatogawa T
    Biom J; 2011 Sep; 53(5):810-21. PubMed ID: 21887795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of covariance as a remedy for demographic mismatch of research subject groups: some sobering simulations.
    Adams KM; Brown GG; Grant I
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1985 Aug; 7(4):445-62. PubMed ID: 4031027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.