These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26812577)

  • 1. The yield and quality of cellular and bacterial DNA extracts from human oral rinse samples are variably affected by the cell lysis methodology.
    Sohrabi M; Nair RG; Samaranayake LP; Zhang L; Zulfiker AH; Ahmetagic A; Good D; Wei MQ
    J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Mar; 122():64-72. PubMed ID: 26812577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The saliva microbiome profiles are minimally affected by collection method or DNA extraction protocols.
    Lim Y; Totsika M; Morrison M; Punyadeera C
    Sci Rep; 2017 Aug; 7(1):8523. PubMed ID: 28819242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of Lysis Methods for the Extraction of Bacterial DNA for Analysis of the Vaginal Microbiota.
    Gill C; van de Wijgert JH; Blow F; Darby AC
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0163148. PubMed ID: 27643503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimization of DNA extraction for advancing coral microbiota investigations.
    Weber L; DeForce E; Apprill A
    Microbiome; 2017 Feb; 5(1):18. PubMed ID: 28179023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating the Impact of DNA Extraction Method on the Representation of Human Oral Bacterial and Fungal Communities.
    Vesty A; Biswas K; Taylor MW; Gear K; Douglas RG
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169877. PubMed ID: 28099455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A novel chemical lysis method for maximum release of DNA from difficult-to-lyse bacteria.
    de Bruin OM; Chiefari A; Wroblewski D; Egan C; Kelly-Cirino CD
    Microb Pathog; 2019 Jan; 126():292-297. PubMed ID: 30414838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Tasmanian devil microbiome-implications for conservation and management.
    Cheng Y; Fox S; Pemberton D; Hogg C; Papenfuss AT; Belov K
    Microbiome; 2015 Dec; 3():76. PubMed ID: 26689946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of different pre-lysis methods and extraction kits for recovery of Streptococcus agalacticae (Lancefield group B Streptococcus) DNA from whole blood.
    Burke RM; McKenna JP; Cox C; Coyle PV; Shields MD; Fairley DJ
    J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Oct; 129():103-108. PubMed ID: 27546716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of DNA extraction methods in analysis of salivary bacterial communities.
    Lazarevic V; Gaïa N; Girard M; François P; Schrenzel J
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e67699. PubMed ID: 23844068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterisation of the human oral microbiome in patients with coronary artery disease using next-generation sequencing of 16SrRNA amplicons.
    Menon T; Gopalakrishnan SN; Balasubramanian R; Justin SR
    Indian J Med Microbiol; 2017; 35(1):101-104. PubMed ID: 28303827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the Oral Microbiomes of Canines and Their Owners Using Next-Generation Sequencing.
    Oh C; Lee K; Cheong Y; Lee SW; Park SY; Song CS; Choi IS; Lee JB
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0131468. PubMed ID: 26134411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative analysis of DNA extraction and PCR product purification methods for cervicovaginal microbiome analysis using cpn60 microbial profiling.
    Shvartsman E; Richmond MEI; Schellenberg JJ; Lamont A; Perciani C; Russell JNH; Poliquin V; Burgener A; Jaoko W; Sandstrom P; MacDonald KS
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0262355. PubMed ID: 35025956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Biases on community structure during DNA extraction of shrimp intestinal microbiota revealed by high-throughput sequencing].
    Wen C; He Y; Xue M; Liang H; Dong J
    Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao; 2016 Jan; 56(1):130-42. PubMed ID: 27305787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bacterial community analysis of activated sludge: an evaluation of four commonly used DNA extraction methods.
    Vanysacker L; Declerck SA; Hellemans B; De Meester L; Vankelecom I; Declerck P
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2010 Sep; 88(1):299-307. PubMed ID: 20652692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improved yield and accuracy for DNA extraction in microbiome studies with variation in microbial biomass.
    Davis A; Kohler C; Alsallaq R; Hayden R; Maron G; Margolis E
    Biotechniques; 2019 Jun; 66(6):285-289. PubMed ID: 31124702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the oral microbiome in mouthwash and whole saliva samples.
    Fan X; Peters BA; Min D; Ahn J; Hayes RB
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0194729. PubMed ID: 29641531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of DNA extraction methods on 16S rRNA-based profiling of bacterial communities in cheese.
    Markusková B; Minarovičová J; Véghová A; Drahovská H; Kaclíková E
    J Microbiol Methods; 2021 May; 184():106210. PubMed ID: 33774112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of saliva processing on bacterial DNA extraction.
    Polgárová K; Behuliak M; Celec P
    New Microbiol; 2010 Oct; 33(4):373-9. PubMed ID: 21213596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of cell lysis treatment before saliva metagenomic DNA extraction on the oral microbiome and the associated resistome.
    Tansirichaiya S; Songsomboon K; Chaianant N; Lertsivawinyu W; Al-Haroni M
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2024 Aug; 10(4):e905. PubMed ID: 38938117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficiency of chemical versus mechanical disruption methods of DNA extraction for the identification of oral Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.
    Li X; Bosch-Tijhof CJ; Wei X; de Soet JJ; Crielaard W; Loveren CV; Deng DM
    J Int Med Res; 2020 May; 48(5):300060520925594. PubMed ID: 32459112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.