These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26812577)

  • 21. Dead or alive: Deoxyribonuclease I sensitive bacteria and implications for the sinus microbiome.
    Willis AL; Calton JB; Carr TF; Chiu AG; Chang EH
    Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2016; 30(2):94-8. PubMed ID: 26715059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact of metagenomic DNA extraction procedures on the identifiable endophytic bacterial diversity in Sorghum bicolor (L. Moench).
    Maropola MK; Ramond JB; Trindade M
    J Microbiol Methods; 2015 May; 112():104-17. PubMed ID: 25775938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Identification and removal of contaminating microbial DNA from PCR reagents: impact on low-biomass microbiome analyses.
    Stinson LF; Keelan JA; Payne MS
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2019 Jan; 68(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 30383890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Characterization of the oral microbiota of healthy cats using next-generation sequencing.
    Sturgeon A; Pinder SL; Costa MC; Weese JS
    Vet J; 2014 Aug; 201(2):223-9. PubMed ID: 24680670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Impact of DNA extraction method and targeted 16S-rRNA hypervariable region on oral microbiota profiling.
    Teng F; Darveekaran Nair SS; Zhu P; Li S; Huang S; Li X; Xu J; Yang F
    Sci Rep; 2018 Nov; 8(1):16321. PubMed ID: 30397210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of DNA extraction methods for human gut microbial community profiling.
    Lim MY; Song EJ; Kim SH; Lee J; Nam YD
    Syst Appl Microbiol; 2018 Mar; 41(2):151-157. PubMed ID: 29305057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Freezing fecal samples prior to DNA extraction affects the Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio determined by downstream quantitative PCR analysis.
    Bahl MI; Bergström A; Licht TR
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2012 Apr; 329(2):193-7. PubMed ID: 22325006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of Oral Cavity DNA Extraction Methods on Bacterial and Fungal Microbiota.
    Rosenbaum J; Usyk M; Chen Z; Zolnik CP; Jones HE; Waldron L; Dowd JB; Thorpe LE; Burk RD
    Sci Rep; 2019 Feb; 9(1):1531. PubMed ID: 30728424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. DNA extraction from activated sludges.
    Bourrain M; Achouak W; Urbain V; Heulin T
    Curr Microbiol; 1999 Jun; 38(6):315-9. PubMed ID: 10341070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of Standard Culture-Based Method to Culture-Independent Method for Evaluation of Hygiene Effects on the Hand Microbiome.
    Zapka C; Leff J; Henley J; Tittl J; De Nardo E; Butler M; Griggs R; Fierer N; Edmonds-Wilson S
    mBio; 2017 Mar; 8(2):. PubMed ID: 28351915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Oral specimens as a tool for accurate metagenomic analysis: A pilot study.
    Rodríguez-Fuentes ME; Pérez-Sayáns M; Barbeito-Castiñeiras G; Molares-Vila A; Prado-Pena IB; Camolesi GCV; López-López R
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Oct; 125(5S2):101991. PubMed ID: 39084558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation and optimization of lysis method for microbial DNA extraction from epiphytic phyllosphere samples.
    Yang S; Lee J; Mahmood M; Min D; Im J
    J Microbiol Methods; 2023 Mar; 206():106677. PubMed ID: 36716930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Variability in the Pre-Analytical Stages Influences Microbiome Laboratory Analyses.
    Kumar A; Gravdal K; Segal JP; Steed H; Brookes MJ; Al-Hassi HO
    Genes (Basel); 2022 Jun; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 35741831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Enhanced microbial diversity in the saliva microbiome induced by short-term probiotic intake revealed by 16S rRNA sequencing on the IonTorrent PGM platform.
    Dassi E; Ballarini A; Covello G; ; Quattrone A; Jousson O; De Sanctis V; Bertorelli R; Denti MA; Segata N
    J Biotechnol; 2014 Nov; 190():30-9. PubMed ID: 24670254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [DNA extraction methods of compost for molecular ecology analysis].
    Yang ZH; Xiao Y; Zeng GM; Liu YG; Deng JH
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2006 Aug; 27(8):1613-7. PubMed ID: 17111621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dynamics of the oral microbiota as a tool to estimate time since death.
    Adserias-Garriga J; Quijada NM; Hernandez M; Rodríguez Lázaro D; Steadman D; Garcia-Gil LJ
    Mol Oral Microbiol; 2017 Dec; 32(6):511-516. PubMed ID: 28654195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Gene Sequence Analyses of the Healthy Oral Microbiome in Humans and Companion Animals.
    Davis EM
    J Vet Dent; 2016 Jun; 33(2):97-107. PubMed ID: 28326980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Selective removal of human DNA from metagenomic DNA samples extracted from dental plaque.
    Hunter SJ; Easton S; Booth V; Henderson B; Wade WG; Ward JM
    J Basic Microbiol; 2011 Aug; 51(4):442-6. PubMed ID: 21298692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessing saliva microbiome collection and processing methods.
    Armstrong AJS; Parmar V; Blaser MJ
    NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes; 2021 Nov; 7(1):81. PubMed ID: 34795298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. DNA extraction method affects microbial community profiles from soils and sediment.
    Carrigg C; Rice O; Kavanagh S; Collins G; O'Flaherty V
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Dec; 77(4):955-64. PubMed ID: 17960375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.