218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26813232)
1. Evaluation of the autogenous bone block transfer for dental implant placement: Symphysal or ramus harvesting?
Ersanli S; Arısan V; Bedeloğlu E
BMC Oral Health; 2016 Jan; 16():4. PubMed ID: 26813232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of peri-implant bone resorption around Straumann Bone Level implants placed in areas reconstructed with autogenous vertical onlay bone grafts.
Chiapasco M; Casentini P; Zaniboni M; Corsi E
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Sep; 23(9):1012-21. PubMed ID: 22092480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Alternative bone expansion technique for implant placement in atrophic edentulous maxilla and mandible.
Demetriades N; Park JI; Laskarides C
J Oral Implantol; 2011 Aug; 37(4):463-71. PubMed ID: 20662673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sinus augmentation bone grafts for the provision of dental implants: report of clinical outcome.
McCarthy C; Patel RR; Wragg PF; Brook IM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):377-82. PubMed ID: 12814312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review.
Wallace SS; Froum SJ
Ann Periodontol; 2003 Dec; 8(1):328-43. PubMed ID: 14971260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A retrospective 10-year mean follow-up of implants placed in ridges grafted using autogenous mandibular blocks covered with bovine bone mineral and collagen membrane.
Chiapasco M; Tommasato G; Palombo D; Del Fabbro M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Apr; 31(4):328-340. PubMed ID: 31898345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ramus or chin grafts for maxillary sinus inlay and local onlay augmentation: comparison of donor site morbidity and complications.
Clavero J; Lundgren S
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2003; 5(3):154-60. PubMed ID: 14575631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term assessment (5 to 71 months) of endosseous dental implants placed in the augmented maxillary sinus.
Olson JW; Dent CD; Morris HF; Ochi S
Ann Periodontol; 2000 Dec; 5(1):152-6. PubMed ID: 11885175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture.
Hallman M; Sennerby L; Lundgren S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):635-43. PubMed ID: 12381063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Maxillary tuberosity block bone graft: innovative technique and case report.
Tolstunov L
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1723-9. PubMed ID: 19615588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomized clinical trial to evaluate and compare implants placed in augmented versus non-augmented extraction sockets: 3-year results.
Barone A; Orlando B; Cingano L; Marconcini S; Derchi G; Covani U
J Periodontol; 2012 Jul; 83(7):836-46. PubMed ID: 22141358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Staged horizontal bone augmentation for dental implants in aesthetic zones: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial comparing a half-columnar bone block harvested from the ramus versus a rectangular bone block from the symphysis.
Zhao X; Zou L; Chen Y; Tang Z
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Oct; 49(10):1326-1334. PubMed ID: 32273165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dental implants and onlay bone grafts in the anterior maxilla: analysis of clinical outcome.
McCarthy C; Patel RR; Wragg PF; Brook IM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(2):238-41. PubMed ID: 12705302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Calvarial Bone Grafting for Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Severe Maxillary Defects: A Case Series.
Restoy-Lozano A; Dominguez-Mompell JL; Infante-Cossio P; Lara-Chao J; Lopez-Pizarro V
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(4):880-90. PubMed ID: 26252040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implant success in sinus-lifted maxillae and native bone: a 3-year clinical and computerized tomographic follow-up.
Sbordone L; Toti P; Menchini-Fabris G; Sbordone C; Guidetti F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):316-24. PubMed ID: 19492648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Alveolar ridge augmentation with titanium mesh and a combination of autogenous bone and anorganic bovine bone: a 2-year prospective study.
Pieri F; Corinaldesi G; Fini M; Aldini NN; Giardino R; Marchetti C
J Periodontol; 2008 Nov; 79(11):2093-103. PubMed ID: 18980518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-Term Outcomes of Implants Placed in Autogenous Onlay Bone Grafts Harvested from Mandibular Ramus and Risk Analysis.
Pang KM; Shin Y; Park JY; Kim B; Kim SM; Lee JH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(4):745-754. PubMed ID: 34411216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of cancellous block allograft for sinus floor augmentation with simultaneous implant placement in the posterior atrophic maxilla.
Chaushu G; Mardinger O; Calderon S; Moses O; Nissan J
J Periodontol; 2009 Mar; 80(3):422-8. PubMed ID: 19254126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Clinical effects of ridge augmentation with the half-columnar shaped mandibular bone block for the placement of dental implants].
Tang ZH; Lv H; Cao MX; Wu MJ
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2010 Feb; 42(1):94-7. PubMed ID: 20140053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla with dental implants in the augmented maxillary sinus: a 5-year clinical investigation.
Hürzeler MB; Kirsch A; Ackermann KL; Quiñones CR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(4):466-75. PubMed ID: 8803342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
