220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26813242)
1. Implant-retained prostheses: ball vs. conus attachments - A randomized controlled clinical trial.
Cepa S; Koller B; Spies BC; Stampf S; Kohal RJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Feb; 28(2):177-185. PubMed ID: 26813242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient preference and satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or locator attachments: a crossover clinical trial.
Krennmair G; Seemann R; Fazekas A; Ewers R; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1560-8. PubMed ID: 23189311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of ball and telescopic crown attachments in implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 5-year prospective study.
Krennmair G; Seemann R; Weinländer M; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):598-606. PubMed ID: 21691608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or telescopic crown attachments: a 3-year prospective study.
Krennmair G; Weinländer M; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 16602365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Removable four implant-supported mandibular overdentures rigidly retained with telescopic crowns or milled bars: a 3-year prospective study.
Krennmair G; Sütö D; Seemann R; Piehslinger E
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):481-8. PubMed ID: 21504478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with a milled bar: a retrospective study.
Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):987-94. PubMed ID: 18271381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Removable implant-prosthodontic rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible: five-year results of different prosthetic anchorage concepts.
Weinländer M; Piehslinger E; Krennmair G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):589-97. PubMed ID: 20556260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction.
De Kok IJ; Chang KH; Lu TS; Cooper LF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21483895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Unsplinted Attachment Systems and Peri-implant Outcomes in Two-implant-retained Mandibular Overdentures: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Patil PG; Seow LL; Kweh TJ; Nimbalkar S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Nov; 22(11):1346-1354. PubMed ID: 35343463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stud vs Bar Attachments for Maxillary Four-Implant-Supported Overdentures: 3- to 9-year Results from a Retrospective Study.
Lian M; Zhao K; Wang F; Huang W; Zhang X; Wu Y
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(4):936–946. PubMed ID: 30934037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A 5-year randomized trial to compare 1 or 2 implants for implant overdentures.
Bryant SR; Walton JN; MacEntee MI
J Dent Res; 2015 Jan; 94(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 25348544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient satisfaction with two designs of implant supported removable overdentures; ball attachment and magnets.
Ellis JS; Burawi G; Walls A; Thomason JM
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1293-8. PubMed ID: 19832769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results.
MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or bar attachments: a randomized prospective 5-year study.
Gotfredsen K; Holm B
Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 11203620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term clinical and prosthetic outcomes of soft liner and clip attachments for bar/implant overdentures: a randomised controlled clinical trial.
ELsyad MA; Shaheen NH; Ashmawy TM
J Oral Rehabil; 2017 Jun; 44(6):472-480. PubMed ID: 28258636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Marginal bone loss adjacent to conventional and immediate loaded two implants supporting a ball-retained mandibular overdenture: a 3-year randomized clinical trial.
Elsyad MA; Al-Mahdy YF; Fouad MM
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):496-503. PubMed ID: 21504479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mandibular overdentures retained by two implants: 10-year results from a crossover clinical trial comparing ball-socket and bar-clip attachments.
Cune M; Burgers M; van Kampen F; de Putter C; van der Bilt A
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(4):310-7. PubMed ID: 20617218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient-based and clinical outcomes of implant telescopic attachment-retained mandibular overdentures: a 1-year longitudinal prospective study.
Yunus N; Saub R; Taiyeb Ali TB; Salleh NM; Baig MR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1149-56. PubMed ID: 25216142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Locators versus magnetic attachment effect on peri-implant tissue health of immediate loaded two implants retaining a mandibular overdenture: a 1-year randomised trial.
Elsyad MA; Mahanna FF; Elshahat MA; Elshoukouki AH
J Oral Rehabil; 2016 Apr; 43(4):297-305. PubMed ID: 26549496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative Clinical Study of Conventional Dental Implants and Mini Dental Implants for Mandibular Overdentures: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Aunmeungtong W; Kumchai T; Strietzel FP; Reichart PA; Khongkhunthian P
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Apr; 19(2):328-340. PubMed ID: 27804205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
