These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Patient preference and satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or locator attachments: a crossover clinical trial. Krennmair G; Seemann R; Fazekas A; Ewers R; Piehslinger E Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1560-8. PubMed ID: 23189311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of ball and telescopic crown attachments in implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 5-year prospective study. Krennmair G; Seemann R; Weinländer M; Piehslinger E Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):598-606. PubMed ID: 21691608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or telescopic crown attachments: a 3-year prospective study. Krennmair G; Weinländer M; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 16602365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Removable four implant-supported mandibular overdentures rigidly retained with telescopic crowns or milled bars: a 3-year prospective study. Krennmair G; Sütö D; Seemann R; Piehslinger E Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):481-8. PubMed ID: 21504478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with a milled bar: a retrospective study. Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):987-94. PubMed ID: 18271381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Removable implant-prosthodontic rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible: five-year results of different prosthetic anchorage concepts. Weinländer M; Piehslinger E; Krennmair G Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):589-97. PubMed ID: 20556260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction. De Kok IJ; Chang KH; Lu TS; Cooper LF Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21483895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Unsplinted Attachment Systems and Peri-implant Outcomes in Two-implant-retained Mandibular Overdentures: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Patil PG; Seow LL; Kweh TJ; Nimbalkar S J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Nov; 22(11):1346-1354. PubMed ID: 35343463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stud vs Bar Attachments for Maxillary Four-Implant-Supported Overdentures: 3- to 9-year Results from a Retrospective Study. Lian M; Zhao K; Wang F; Huang W; Zhang X; Wu Y Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(4):936–946. PubMed ID: 30934037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A 5-year randomized trial to compare 1 or 2 implants for implant overdentures. Bryant SR; Walton JN; MacEntee MI J Dent Res; 2015 Jan; 94(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 25348544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient satisfaction with two designs of implant supported removable overdentures; ball attachment and magnets. Ellis JS; Burawi G; Walls A; Thomason JM Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1293-8. PubMed ID: 19832769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results. MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or bar attachments: a randomized prospective 5-year study. Gotfredsen K; Holm B Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 11203620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term clinical and prosthetic outcomes of soft liner and clip attachments for bar/implant overdentures: a randomised controlled clinical trial. ELsyad MA; Shaheen NH; Ashmawy TM J Oral Rehabil; 2017 Jun; 44(6):472-480. PubMed ID: 28258636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Marginal bone loss adjacent to conventional and immediate loaded two implants supporting a ball-retained mandibular overdenture: a 3-year randomized clinical trial. Elsyad MA; Al-Mahdy YF; Fouad MM Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):496-503. PubMed ID: 21504479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mandibular overdentures retained by two implants: 10-year results from a crossover clinical trial comparing ball-socket and bar-clip attachments. Cune M; Burgers M; van Kampen F; de Putter C; van der Bilt A Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(4):310-7. PubMed ID: 20617218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient-based and clinical outcomes of implant telescopic attachment-retained mandibular overdentures: a 1-year longitudinal prospective study. Yunus N; Saub R; Taiyeb Ali TB; Salleh NM; Baig MR Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1149-56. PubMed ID: 25216142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Locators versus magnetic attachment effect on peri-implant tissue health of immediate loaded two implants retaining a mandibular overdenture: a 1-year randomised trial. Elsyad MA; Mahanna FF; Elshahat MA; Elshoukouki AH J Oral Rehabil; 2016 Apr; 43(4):297-305. PubMed ID: 26549496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative Clinical Study of Conventional Dental Implants and Mini Dental Implants for Mandibular Overdentures: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Aunmeungtong W; Kumchai T; Strietzel FP; Reichart PA; Khongkhunthian P Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Apr; 19(2):328-340. PubMed ID: 27804205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]