These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Independent component analysis as a rotation method: a very different solution to Thurstone's box problem. Jennrich RI; Trendafilov NT Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 Nov; 58(Pt 2):199-208. PubMed ID: 16293197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identification and Small Sample Estimation of Thurstone's Unrestricted Model for Paired Comparisons Data. Maydeu-Olivares A; Hernández A Multivariate Behav Res; 2007; 42(2):323-47. PubMed ID: 26765490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Permutimin: Factor Rotation to Simple Structure with Permutation of Variables. Yamashita N; Adachi K Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 31021266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A brief comment on Thurstone's note on a reanalysis of Davis' reading tests. DAVIS FB Psychometrika; 1946 Dec; 11(4):249-55. PubMed ID: 20288946 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. EVIDENCE ON THE SIMPLE STRUCTURE AND FACTOR INVARIANCE ACHIEVED BY FIVE ROTATIONAL METHODS ON FOUR TYPES OF DATA. Dielman TE; Cattell RB; Wagner A Multivariate Behav Res; 1972 Jan; 7(2):223-42. PubMed ID: 26828604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Weighting the seriousness of perceived health problems using Thurstone's method of paired comparisons. McKenna SP; Hunt SM; McEwen J Int J Epidemiol; 1981 Mar; 10(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 7239768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On the identifiability of Parameters in Thurstone's multiple factor analysis. REIERSOL O Psychometrika; 1950 Jun; 15(2):121-49. PubMed ID: 15430515 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Modeling subjective health outcomes: top 10 reasons to use Thurstone's method. Maydeu-Olivares A; Böckenholt U Med Care; 2008 Apr; 46(4):346-8. PubMed ID: 18362812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Theoretical note a small error in Thurstone's length-difficulty function. Bogartz W Psychol Rev; 1968 Sep; 75(5):442-5. PubMed ID: 5685422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Luce's choice model and Thurstone's categorical judgment model compared: Kornbrot's data revisited. Nosofsky RM Percept Psychophys; 1985 Jan; 37(1):89-91. PubMed ID: 3991325 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Empirical Comparison of Factor and Order Analysis on Prestructured and Random Data. Krus DJ; Weiss DJ Multivariate Behav Res; 1976 Jan; 11(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 26797181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Thurstone's measurement of social values revisited forty years later. Coombs CH J Pers Soc Psychol; 1967 May; 6(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 6032762 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A MODIFICATION OF THURSTONE'S LAW OF COMPARATIVE JUDGMENT TO ACCOMMODATE A JUDGMENT CATEGORY OF "EQUAL" OR "NO DIFFERENCE". GREENBERG MG Psychol Bull; 1965 Aug; 64():108-12. PubMed ID: 14320075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Deterioration of primary mental aptitudes in a population of 145 alcoholics by Thurstone's test (Factorial P.M.A. Battery)]. Fontan M; Chabrier A Lille Med; 1968; 13(7):735-47. PubMed ID: 5739100 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A Simple Method for Procrustean Rotation in Factor Analysis Using Majorization Theory. Trendafilov NT Multivariate Behav Res; 1994 Oct; 29(4):385-408. PubMed ID: 26745235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]