147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2681620)
1. Predictive value of antinative DNA for systemic lupus erythematosus: comparison of radioimmunoassay and enzyme immunoassay.
Clough JD; Chang RK
J Clin Lab Anal; 1989; 3(5):273-6. PubMed ID: 2681620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical significance of anti-nDNA antibodies in ANA-positive systemic lupus erythematosus: comparison of the Farr radioimmunoassay and the Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescent technique.
Chuan MT; Wu YC; Ang ET; Wang JH; In KL; Lü YC
Zhonghua Min Guo Wei Sheng Wu Ji Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1985 Feb; 18(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 3896689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the Farr radioimmunoassay, 3 commercial enzyme immunoassays and Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test for diagnosis and activity assessment of systemic lupus erythematosus.
Launay D; Schmidt J; Lepers S; Mirault T; Lambert M; Kyndt X; Reumaux D; Duhamel A; Hachulla E; Hatron PY; Prin L; Dubucquoi S
Clin Chim Acta; 2010 Jul; 411(13-14):959-64. PubMed ID: 20303931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Systemic lupus erythematosus and the crithidia luciliae immunofluorescent test. A comparative study with an adapted Farr radioimmunoassay.
Whitehouse IJ; Fehr K; Wagenhäuser FJ
Z Rheumatol; 1983; 42(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 6342296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Determination of anti dsDNA antibodies by immunofluorescence using Crithidia luciliae. I--Diagnostic and prognostic value in systemic lupus erythematosus. Comparison with the Farr radioimmunoassay].
Borda-Iriarte O; Meyer O; Cyna J; Haïm T; Ryckewaert A
Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic; 1984 Apr; 51(4):185-91. PubMed ID: 6374861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Crithidia luciliae and Farr assays for the detection of systemic lupus erythematosus.
Burdash NM; Teti G; Papadopoulos V
Ann Clin Lab Sci; 1983; 13(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 6340594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnosing systemic lupus erythematosus: new-generation immunoassays for measurement of anti-dsDNA antibodies are an effective alternative to the Farr technique and the Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test.
Antico A; Platzgummer S; Bassetti D; Bizzaro N; Tozzoli R; Villalta D;
Lupus; 2010 Jul; 19(8):906-12. PubMed ID: 20179169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus in Jamaica by Crithidia luciliae indirect immunofluorescence test.
Fisher-Smikle M; James OB
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg; 1987; 81(2):255-6. PubMed ID: 3303482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of anti-DNA antibodies: a comparison between two Farr assays, Crithidia luciliae and a human chromosomal substrate assay.
Tipping PG; Buchanan RR; Riglar AG; Dimech WJ; Littlejohn GO; Holdsworth SR
Br J Rheumatol; 1988 Jun; 27(3):206-10. PubMed ID: 3288291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Antibodies against ds-DNA and nucleoprotein in systemic lupus erythematosus--comparison of various determinative methods].
Geissler K; Graninger W
Z Rheumatol; 1985; 44(6):254-8. PubMed ID: 3913215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical usefulness of the Crithida luciliae test for antibodies to native DNA.
Whiteside TL; Dixon JA
Am J Clin Pathol; 1979 Nov; 72(5):829-35. PubMed ID: 389032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Antibodies against ds-DNA in systemic lupus erythematosus--value for diagnosis and determination of activity].
Geissler K; Graninger W
Immun Infekt; 1986 May; 14(3):119-20. PubMed ID: 3519437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of anti-dsDNA as diagnostic tool.
Swaak AJ; Groenwold J; Aarden LA; Feltkamp TE
Ann Rheum Dis; 1981 Feb; 40(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 7008712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison and evaluation of different methodologies and tests for detection of anti-dsDNA antibodies on 889 Slovenian patients' and blood donors' sera.
Zigon P; Lakota K; Cucnik S; Svec T; Ambrozic A; Sodin-Semrl S; Kveder T
Croat Med J; 2011 Dec; 52(6):694-702. PubMed ID: 22180268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical significance of anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies detected by a solid phase enzyme immunoassay.
Miller TE; Lahita RG; Zarro VJ; MacWilliam J; Koffler D
Arthritis Rheum; 1981 Apr; 24(4):602-10. PubMed ID: 7011327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Myth and reality: practical test system for the measurement of anti-DNA antibodies in the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
McCloskey LJ; Christner P; Jacobs-Kosmin D; Jaskowski TD; Hill HR; Lakos G; Teodorescu M
J Clin Lab Anal; 2010; 24(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 20333761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The clinical significance of measuring different anti-dsDNA antibodies by using the Farr assay, an enzyme immunoassay and a Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test.
Werle E; Blazek M; Fiehn W
Lupus; 1992 Dec; 1(6):369-77. PubMed ID: 1304405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescent test for the detection of antibodies to native DNA.
Mauff AC
S Afr Med J; 1981 Jan; 59(3):69-70. PubMed ID: 7008212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic accuracy of currently available anti-double-stranded DNA antibody assays. An Italian multicentre study.
Ghirardello A; Villalta D; Morozzi G; Afeltra A; Galeazzi M; Gerli R; Mathieu A; Meroni PL; Pregnolato F; Migliorini P; Radice A; Riccieri V; Ruffatti A; Sebastiani GD; Sinico RA; Tincani A; Doria A;
Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2011; 29(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 21345292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of commercial kits for the detection of anti-nDNA antibodies using Crithidia luciliae.
Jansen EM; Deng JS; Beutner EH; Kumar V; Chorzelski TP
Am J Clin Pathol; 1987 Apr; 87(4):461-9. PubMed ID: 3548319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
