These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26816572)

  • 1. Evaluation of biogeneric design techniques with CEREC CAD/CAM system.
    Arslan Y; Karakoca Nemli S; Bankoğlu Güngör M; Tamam E; Yılmaz H
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2015 Dec; 7(6):431-6. PubMed ID: 26816572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison and evaluation of the morphology of crowns generated by biogeneric design technique with CEREC chairside system.
    Wang F; Tang Q; Xi S; Liu R; Niu L
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227050. PubMed ID: 31945072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Maximum Intercuspal Contacts of Articulated Casts and Virtual Casts Requiring Posterior Fixed Partial Dentures.
    Arslan Y; Bankoğlu Güngör M; Karakoca Nemli S; Kökdoğan Boyacı B; Aydın C
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Oct; 26(7):594-598. PubMed ID: 26848940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. InLab and Cerec Connect: virtual contacts in maximum intercuspation compared with original contacts--an in vitro study.
    Nemli SK; Wolfart S; Reich S
    Int J Comput Dent; 2012; 15(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 22930945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of chairside and laboratory CAD/CAM to conventional produced all-ceramic crowns regarding morphology, occlusion, and aesthetics.
    Kollmuss M; Kist S; Goeke JE; Hickel R; Huth KC
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 May; 20(4):791-7. PubMed ID: 26245275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison between the occlusal morphology of virtually reconstructed posterior crowns and natural molars.
    Kwon HB; Kim HK; Shon WJ; Park YS
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2014; 34(4):e73-8. PubMed ID: 25006777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Morphology and mechanical performance of dental crown designed by 3D-DCGAN.
    Ding H; Cui Z; Maghami E; Chen Y; Matinlinna JP; Pow EHN; Fok ASL; Burrow MF; Wang W; Tsoi JKH
    Dent Mater; 2023 Mar; 39(3):320-332. PubMed ID: 36822895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of biogenerically reconstructed and waxed-up complete occlusal surfaces with respect to the original tooth morphology.
    Kollmuss M; Jakob FM; Kirchner HG; Ilie N; Hickel R; Huth KC
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Apr; 17(3):851-7. PubMed ID: 22580927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computer modeling of occlusal surfaces of posterior teeth with the CICERO CAD/CAM system.
    Olthoff LW; Van Der Zel JM; De Ruiter WJ; Vlaar ST; Bosman F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Aug; 84(2):154-62. PubMed ID: 10946332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the Fit of Lithium Disilicate Crowns made from Conventional, Digital, or Conventional/Digital Techniques.
    Al Hamad KQ; Al Rashdan BA; Al Omari WM; Baba NZ
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e580-e586. PubMed ID: 30091168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs.
    Akbar JH; Petrie CS; Walker MP; Williams K; Eick JD
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 16681497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interproximal distance analysis of stereolithographic casts made by CAD-CAM technology: An in vitro study.
    Hoffman M; Cho SH; Bansal NK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Nov; 118(5):624-630. PubMed ID: 28477918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of Different CAM Strategies on the Fit of Partial Crown Restorations: A Digital Three-dimensional Evaluation.
    Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(5):530-538. PubMed ID: 29630483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Design of occlusal wear facets of fixed dental prostheses driven by personalized mandibular movement.
    Li L; Chen H; Zhao Y; Wang Y; Sun Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jul; 128(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 33549341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-Dimensional Digital Evaluation of the Fit of Endocrowns Fabricated from Different CAD/CAM Materials.
    Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e504-e509. PubMed ID: 29508488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro.
    Schaefer O; Decker M; Wittstock F; Kuepper H; Guentsch A
    J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 24508541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology.
    Batson ER; Cooper LF; Duqum I; Mendonça G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of preparation design on fit and ceramic thickness of CEREC 3 partial ceramic crowns after cementation.
    Kim JH; Cho BH; Lee JH; Kwon SJ; Yi YA; Shin Y; Roh BD; Seo DG
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2015 Feb; 73(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 25299600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing the precision of reproducibility of computer-aided occlusal design to conventional methods.
    Muric A; Gokcen Röhlig B; Ongul D; Evlioglu G
    J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Jan; 63(1):110-114. PubMed ID: 30446412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Comparison of Marginal Gaps of All-Ceramic Crowns Constructed from Scanned Impressions and Models.
    Tabesh R; Dudley J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2018; 31(1):71–73. PubMed ID: 29166420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.