These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2681697)

  • 1. Evaluation of potassium oxalate as a cavity liner.
    Sandoval VA; Cooley RL; Barnwell SE
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Sep; 62(3):283-7. PubMed ID: 2681697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro evaluation of the use of resin liners to reduce microleakage and improve retention of amalgam restorations.
    Charlton DG; Moore BK; Swartz ML
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(3):112-9. PubMed ID: 1437693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of bonded amalgam restorations on microleakage.
    Al-Jazairy YH; Louka AN
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):203-9. PubMed ID: 10823065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microleakage of amalgam restorations using Amalgambond and Copalite.
    Edgren BN; Denehy GE
    Am J Dent; 1992 Dec; 5(6):296-8. PubMed ID: 1304174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microleakage of amalgam restorations using dentin bonding system primers.
    Berry FA; Parker SD; Rice D; Muñoz CA
    Am J Dent; 1996 Aug; 9(4):174-8. PubMed ID: 9002794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of a copal varnish, ZOE or glass ionomer cement bases on microleakage of amalgam restorations.
    Manders CA; Garcia-Godoy F; Barnwell GM
    Am J Dent; 1990 Apr; 3(2):63-6. PubMed ID: 2076225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dentin adhesive superior to copal varnish in preventing microleakage in primary teeth.
    Royse MC; Ott NW; Mathieu GP
    Pediatr Dent; 1996; 18(7):440-3. PubMed ID: 8970205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of the smear layer, Copalite, and oxalate on microleakage.
    Pashley DH; Depew DD
    Oper Dent; 1986; 11(3):95-102. PubMed ID: 3463938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
    Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of amalgam microleakage with a 4-META liner and copal varnish.
    Moore DS; Johnson WW; Kaplan I
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(5):461-6. PubMed ID: 8595104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long term sealing properties of Amalgambond under amalgam restorations.
    Ben-Amar A; Liberman R; Rothkoff Z; Cardash HS
    Am J Dent; 1994 Jun; 7(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 7993602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage.
    Marchiori S; Baratieri LN; de Andrada MA; Monteiro Júnior S; Ritter AV
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Oct; 29(10):637-42. PubMed ID: 9922761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The control of marginal microleakage in amalgam restorations using a dentin adhesive: a pilot study.
    Ben-Amar A; Nordenberg D; Liberman R; Fischer J; Gorfil C
    Dent Mater; 1987 Apr; 3(2):94-6. PubMed ID: 3326765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative microleakage evaluation around amalgam restorations with different treatments on cavity walls.
    de Morais PM; Rodrigues Júnior AL; Pimenta LA
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):217-22. PubMed ID: 10823067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microleakage of a copal rosin cavity varnish.
    Newman SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Apr; 51(4):499-502. PubMed ID: 6587071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microleakage of a dental amalgam alloy bonding agent.
    Saiku JM; St Germain HA; Meiers JC
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(5):172-8. PubMed ID: 8152986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microleakage of a 4-methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride bonding agent with amalgams.
    Chang JC; Chan JT; Chheda HN; Iglesias A
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 May; 75(5):495-8. PubMed ID: 8709013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microleakage and retention of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Winkler MM; Moore BK; Rhodes B; Swartz M
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):245-50. PubMed ID: 11764110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vivo and in vitro evaluations of microleakage around Class I amalgam and composite restorations.
    Alptekin T; Ozer F; Unlu N; Cobanoglu N; Blatz MB
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 21180003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.