195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2681749)
1. Comparison of direct immunofluorescent staining and an enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay for identifying Chlamydia trachomatis in cervical and urethral specimens.
Wiesmeier E; Bruckner DA; Malotte CK; Downie A
J Reprod Med; 1989 Aug; 34(8):517-9. PubMed ID: 2681749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection by direct immunofluorescence staining of genital secretion.
Wiesmeier E; Bruckner D; Black M
Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Mar; 69(3 Pt 1):347-9. PubMed ID: 3547210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the Syva Microtrak enzyme immunoassay and Abbott Chlamydiazyme in the detection of chlamydial infections in women.
Olsen MA; Sambol AR; Bohnert VA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1995 Feb; 119(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 7848062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of chlamydiazyme for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital infections.
Monno R; De Vito D; Vena GA; Mosca A; Miragliotta G
Microbiologica; 1987 Oct; 10(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 3320688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assays in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis: how valid are they?
Weismeier E; Bruckner DA; Malotte CK; Manduke L
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1988 Apr; 9(4):219-23. PubMed ID: 3180707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Chlamydia trachomatis in women: the more you look, the more you find.
Hay PE; Thomas BJ; Horner PJ; MacLeod E; Renton AM; Taylor-Robinson D
Genitourin Med; 1994 Apr; 70(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 8206484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Chlamydia trachomatis: detection using a direct test and culture in 100 genital specimens].
Dutilh B; Bebear C
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1985; 43(3):275-8. PubMed ID: 3896054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in various pathological products. Comparison between direct IF-Chlamydiazyme and cultured cells].
Rouhan D; Le Noc P
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1987; 45(2):160-4. PubMed ID: 3304034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison between the LCx Probe system and the COBAS AMPLICOR system for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections in patients attending a clinic for treatment of sexually transmitted diseases in Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
van Doornum GJ; Schouls LM; Pijl A; Cairo I; Buimer M; Bruisten S
J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Mar; 39(3):829-35. PubMed ID: 11230391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Confirmatory testing demonstrates that false-positive rates in the chlamydiazyme assay are influenced by gender and genital specimen type.
Chernesky M; Jang D; Sellors J; Castriciano S; Pickard L; Luinstra K; Mahony J
Sex Transm Dis; 1993; 20(6):301-6. PubMed ID: 8108751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in endocervical specimens using direct immunofluorescence.
Graber CD; Williamson O; Pike J; Valicenti J
Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Nov; 66(5):727-30. PubMed ID: 3903585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of nonculture-dependent methods for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in pregnant women.
Baselski VS; McNeeley SG; Ryan G; Robison M
Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Jul; 70(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 3299179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of endocervical specimen quality on apparent prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infections diagnosed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method.
Kellogg JA; Seiple JW; Klinedinst JL; Levisky JS
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1991 Dec; 115(12):1223-7. PubMed ID: 1722665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Simultaneous detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis by PCR in genitourinary specimens from men and women attending an STD clinic.
Bhalla P; Baveja UK; Chawla R; Saini S; Khaki P; Bhalla K; Mahajan S; Reddy BS
J Commun Dis; 2007 Mar; 39(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18338709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in routine clinical practice: increased sensitivity of cell culture in comparison with the microimmunofluorescence test].
Sterzik K; Rosenbusch B; Danner B; Heeg KM; Wolf A; Lauritzen C
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1988 Dec; 48(12):881-3. PubMed ID: 3069566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of direct fluorescent antibody tests for routine diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in Russian sexually transmitted disease clinics.
Renton A; Filatova E; Ison C; Meheus A; Dmitriev G; Akovbian V; Taylor-Robinson D
Int J STD AIDS; 2008 Dec; 19(12):851-5. PubMed ID: 19050218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of two enzyme immunoassays and an immunofluorescence test for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
Grillner L; Beckman S; Hammar H
Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1986 Oct; 5(5):559-62. PubMed ID: 3536502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis among conscripts. A comparative study of urine samples and urethral swabs].
Søgaard P; Møller BR; Thorsen P; Nissen LR; Pedersen S; Kargo JC; Jensen AM
Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 Feb; 158(6):759-63. PubMed ID: 8638314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of PCR and direct immunofluorescence microscopy for confirmation of results obtained by Syva MicroTrak Chlamydia enzyme immunoassay.
Ostergaard L; Møller JK
J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Oct; 33(10):2620-3. PubMed ID: 8567894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in semen and urethral specimens from male members of infertile couples in Tunisia.
Gdoura R; Daoudi F; Bouzid F; Ben Salah F; Chaigneau C; Sueur JM; Eb F; Rekik S; Hammami A; Orfila J
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2001 Mar; 6(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 11334471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
