These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26818650)

  • 1. From mercury sphygmomanometer to electric device on blood pressure measurement: correspondence of Minamata Convention on Mercury.
    Asayama K; Ohkubo T; Hoshide S; Kario K; Ohya Y; Rakugi H; Umemura S
    Hypertens Res; 2016 Apr; 39(4):179-82. PubMed ID: 26818650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can an automatic oscillometric device replace a mercury sphygmomanometer on blood pressure measurement? a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Park SH; Park YS
    Blood Press Monit; 2019 Dec; 24(6):265-276. PubMed ID: 31658107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Agreement of blood pressure measurements between random-zero and standard mercury sphygmomanometers.
    Yang W; Gu D; Chen J; Jaquish CE; Rao DC; Wu X; Hixson JE; Duan X; Kelly TN; Hamm LL; Whelton PK; He J;
    Am J Med Sci; 2008 Nov; 336(5):373-8. PubMed ID: 19011391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Consistency between the electronic and mercury sphygmomanometer in children and adolescents on blood pressure measuring].
    Cao Q; Li D; Yu W; Guo Q; Zhao L; Yu D; Wang Y
    Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2016 Sep; 45(5):758-765. PubMed ID: 29903127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In praise of mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Lawes EG
    BMJ; 2000 Dec; 321(7275):1534. PubMed ID: 11189699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A survey to gauge confidence of Indian clinicians on three primary devices for blood pressure measurement.
    Kumar R; Sahani AK; Wander GS
    Blood Press Monit; 2021 Jun; 26(3):196-199. PubMed ID: 33470647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are aneroid sphygmomanometers accurate in hospital and clinic settings?
    Canzanello VJ; Jensen PL; Schwartz GL
    Arch Intern Med; 2001 Mar; 161(5):729-31. PubMed ID: 11231706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical blood pressure measurement verification when comparing a Tensoval duo control device with a mercury sphygmomanometer in patients suffering from atrial fibrillation.
    Farsky S; Benova K; Krausova D; Sirotiaková J; Vysocanova P
    Blood Press Monit; 2011 Oct; 16(5):252-7. PubMed ID: 21914986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Calibration of blood pressure data after replacement of the standard mercury sphygmomanometer by an oscillometric device and concurrent change of cuffs.
    Neuhauser HK; Ellert U; Thamm M; Adler C
    Blood Press Monit; 2015 Feb; 20(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 25144600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Blood pressure measurement in patients with rate controlled atrial fibrillation using mercury sphygmomanometer and Omron HEM-750CP deice in the clinic setting.
    Jani B; Bulpitt CJ; Rajkumar C
    J Hum Hypertens; 2006 Jul; 20(7):543-5. PubMed ID: 16598291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A perfect replacement for the mercury sphygmomanometer: the case of the hybrid blood pressure monitor.
    Stergiou GS; Karpettas N; Kollias A; Destounis A; Tzamouranis D
    J Hum Hypertens; 2012 Apr; 26(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 21900952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical validation of aneroid sphygmomanometer.
    Saxena Y; Saxena V; Gupta R
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2012; 56(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23734440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Demise of the mercury sphygmomanometer and the dawning of a new era in blood pressure measurement.
    O'Brien E
    Blood Press Monit; 2003 Feb; 8(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 12604931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of sphygmomanometers at pharmacies.
    Erdem DG; Erdem E; Dilek M; Aydogdu T; Selim N; Demiray F; Sari A; Akpolat T
    Kidney Blood Press Res; 2009; 32(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 19622898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Alternatives to the mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Buchanan S; Orris P; Karliner J
    J Public Health Policy; 2011 Feb; 32(1):107-20. PubMed ID: 21109765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Blood pressure monitoring with home monitors versus mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Rotch AL; Dean JO; Kendrach MG; Wright SG; Woolley TW
    Ann Pharmacother; 2001; 35(7-8):817-22. PubMed ID: 11485126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
    Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring blood pressure using the mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Valler-Jones T; Wedgbury K
    Br J Nurs; 2005 Feb 10-23; 14(3):145-50. PubMed ID: 15788933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In praise of mercury sphygmomanometers. Electronic readings of blood pressure seem to be higher than readings obtained with mercury sphygmomanometers.
    Ireland J
    BMJ; 2001 May; 322(7296):1249. PubMed ID: 11388188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Replacing the mercury manometer with an oscillometric device in a hypertension clinic: implications for clinical decision making.
    Stergiou GS; Lourida P; Tzamouranis D
    J Hum Hypertens; 2011 Nov; 25(11):692-8. PubMed ID: 21107434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.