These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26818650)

  • 21. Response to the Advisory Statement from the Council for high blood pressure research of the American Heart Association advocating retention of mercury sphygmomanometers.
    O'Brien E
    Hypertension; 2001 Oct; 38(4):E19-20. PubMed ID: 11641320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Measuring blood pressure using an automated sphygmomanometer.
    Wedgbury K; Valler-Jones T
    Br J Nurs; 2008 Jun12-25; 17(11):714-8. PubMed ID: 18773588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The mercury sphygmomanometer should be abandoned before it is proscribed.
    Markandu ND; Whitcher F; Arnold A; Carney C
    J Hum Hypertens; 2000 Jan; 14(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 10673728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Can electronic sphygmomanometers be used for measurement of blood pressure at high altitudes?
    Li S; Zhao X; Ba S; He F; Lam CT; Ke L; Li N; Yan LL; Li X; Wu Y
    Blood Press Monit; 2012 Apr; 17(2):62-8. PubMed ID: 22343751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. What will replace the mercury sphygmomanometer?
    Pickering TG
    Blood Press Monit; 2003 Feb; 8(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 12604932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [The latest developments of the mercurial sphygmomanometers' substitute products].
    Zhou HW; Shang CH
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2009 Sep; 33(5):386-7. PubMed ID: 20073253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accuracy of aneroid sphygmomanometer blood pressure recording compared with digital and mercury measurements in Brazil.
    Gill G; Ala L; Gurgel R; Cuevas L
    Trop Doct; 2004 Jan; 34(1):26-7. PubMed ID: 14959969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Blood pressure randomized methodology study comparing automatic oscillometric and mercury sphygmomanometer devices: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010.
    Ostchega Y; Zhang G; Sorlie P; Hughes JP; Reed-Gillette DS; Nwankwo T; Yoon S
    Natl Health Stat Report; 2012 Oct; (59):1-15. PubMed ID: 24984529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison of two sphygmomanometers that may replace the traditional mercury column in the healthcare workplace.
    Elliott WJ; Young PE; DeVivo L; Feldstein J; Black HR
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17303984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study.
    Ni H; Wu C; Prineas R; Shea S; Liu K; Kronmal R; Bild D
    Am J Hypertens; 2006 Apr; 19(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 16580569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Why automated office blood pressure should now replace the mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Myers MG
    J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2010 Jul; 12(7):478-80. PubMed ID: 20629808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Validation of Oscillomat, a device for self-measurement of blood pressure. Comparison with mercury sphygmomanometers].
    Asmar R; Sassano P; Demolis P; Ménard J; Safar M
    Presse Med; 1991 Mar; 20(12):551-5. PubMed ID: 1827894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How should BP be measured in the office?
    Tobe SW; Izzo JL
    J Am Soc Hypertens; 2016 Mar; 10(3):189-90. PubMed ID: 26839184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mercury sphygmomanometers should not be abandoned: An advisory statement from the Council for High Blood Pressure Research, American Heart Association.
    Jones DW; Frohlich ED; Grim CM; Grim CE; Taubert KA
    Hypertension; 2001 Feb; 37(2):185-6. PubMed ID: 11230268
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Has conventional sphygmomanometry ended with the banning of mercury?
    O'Brien E
    Blood Press Monit; 2002 Feb; 7(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 12040241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical assessment of blood pressure.
    McKay DW; Campbell NR; Parab LS; Chockalingam A; Fodor JG
    J Hum Hypertens; 1990 Dec; 4(6):639-45. PubMed ID: 2096205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Does changing from mercury to electronic blood pressure measurement influence recorded blood pressure? An observational study.
    McManus RJ; Mant J; Hull MR; Hobbs FD
    Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Dec; 53(497):953-6. PubMed ID: 14960220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Similarity between blood pressure values assessed by auscultatory method with mercury sphygmomanometer and automated oscillometric digital device.
    Pavan MV; Saura GE; Korkes HA; Nascimento KM; Madeira Neto ND; Dávila R; Rodrigues CI; Almeida FA
    J Bras Nefrol; 2012 Mar; 34(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 22441181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Replacing the mercury sphygmomanometer. Requires clinicians to demand better automated devices.
    O'Brien E
    BMJ; 2000 Mar; 320(7238):815-6. PubMed ID: 10731152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Electronic versus mercury sphygmomanometers.
    Morrison CL
    Br J Gen Pract; 2004 Feb; 54(499):136-7. PubMed ID: 15046059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.