These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26818848)

  • 1. Learning a hierarchical representation of the yeast transcriptomic machinery using an autoencoder model.
    Chen L; Cai C; Chen V; Lu X
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Jan; 17 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):9. PubMed ID: 26818848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Topological basis of signal integration in the transcriptional-regulatory network of the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Farkas IJ; Wu C; Chennubhotla C; Bahar I; Oltvai ZN
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 7():478. PubMed ID: 17069658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unsupervised deep learning reveals prognostically relevant subtypes of glioblastoma.
    Young JD; Cai C; Lu X
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Oct; 18(Suppl 11):381. PubMed ID: 28984190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gene duplication and hierarchical modularity in intracellular interaction networks.
    Hallinan J
    Biosystems; 2004; 74(1-3):51-62. PubMed ID: 15125992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Yeast cell cycle transcription factors identification by variable selection criteria.
    Wang H; Wang YH; Wu WS
    Gene; 2011 Oct; 485(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 21703335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reconstructing genetic networks in yeast.
    Zhang Z; Gerstein M
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Nov; 21(11):1295-7. PubMed ID: 14595359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transcriptional regulatory networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Lee TI; Rinaldi NJ; Robert F; Odom DT; Bar-Joseph Z; Gerber GK; Hannett NM; Harbison CT; Thompson CM; Simon I; Zeitlinger J; Jennings EG; Murray HL; Gordon DB; Ren B; Wyrick JJ; Tagne JB; Volkert TL; Fraenkel E; Gifford DK; Young RA
    Science; 2002 Oct; 298(5594):799-804. PubMed ID: 12399584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inferring transcriptional compensation interactions in yeast via stepwise structure equation modeling.
    Shieh GS; Chen CM; Yu CY; Huang J; Wang WF; Lo YC
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Mar; 9():134. PubMed ID: 18312694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Multiobjective Sparse Feature Learning Model for Deep Neural Networks.
    Gong M; Liu J; Li H; Cai Q; Su L
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2015 Dec; 26(12):3263-77. PubMed ID: 26340790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combining microarrays and biological knowledge for estimating gene networks via Bayesian networks.
    Imoto S; Higuchi T; Goto T; Tashiro K; Kuhara S; Miyano S
    Proc IEEE Comput Soc Bioinform Conf; 2003; 2():104-13. PubMed ID: 16452784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Refining current knowledge on the yeast FLR1 regulatory network by combined experimental and computational approaches.
    Teixeira MC; Dias PJ; Monteiro PT; Sala A; Oliveira AL; Freitas AT; Sá-Correia I
    Mol Biosyst; 2010 Dec; 6(12):2471-81. PubMed ID: 20938527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Approaches to modeling gene regulatory networks: a gentle introduction.
    Schlitt T
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1021():13-35. PubMed ID: 23715978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Active Interaction Mapping Reveals the Hierarchical Organization of Autophagy.
    Kramer MH; Farré JC; Mitra K; Yu MK; Ono K; Demchak B; Licon K; Flagg M; Balakrishnan R; Cherry JM; Subramani S; Ideker T
    Mol Cell; 2017 Feb; 65(4):761-774.e5. PubMed ID: 28132844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inferring causal metabolic signals that regulate the dynamic TORC1-dependent transcriptome.
    Oliveira AP; Dimopoulos S; Busetto AG; Christen S; Dechant R; Falter L; Haghir Chehreghani M; Jozefczuk S; Ludwig C; Rudroff F; Schulz JC; González A; Soulard A; Stracka D; Aebersold R; Buhmann JM; Hall MN; Peter M; Sauer U; Stelling J
    Mol Syst Biol; 2015 Apr; 11(4):802. PubMed ID: 25888284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Learning to encode cellular responses to systematic perturbations with deep generative models.
    Xue Y; Ding MQ; Lu X
    NPJ Syst Biol Appl; 2020 Nov; 6(1):35. PubMed ID: 33159077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robustness analysis of cellular systems using the genetic tug-of-war method.
    Moriya H; Makanae K; Watanabe K; Chino A; Shimizu-Yoshida Y
    Mol Biosyst; 2012 Oct; 8(10):2513-22. PubMed ID: 22722869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Integrating transcriptional and protein interaction networks to prioritize condition-specific master regulators.
    Padi M; Quackenbush J
    BMC Syst Biol; 2015 Nov; 9():80. PubMed ID: 26576632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Hidden Markov Model approach to predicting yeast gene function from sequential gene expression data.
    Deng X; Geng H; Ali HH
    Int J Bioinform Res Appl; 2008; 4(3):263-73. PubMed ID: 18640903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transcriptional response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to the plasma membrane-perturbing compound chitosan.
    Zakrzewska A; Boorsma A; Brul S; Hellingwerf KJ; Klis FM
    Eukaryot Cell; 2005 Apr; 4(4):703-15. PubMed ID: 15821130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A systems biology approach to study glucose repression in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Westergaard SL; Oliveira AP; Bro C; Olsson L; Nielsen J
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2007 Jan; 96(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 16878332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.