112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26819167)
1. To asses inter- and intra-observer variability for breast density and BIRADS assessment categories in mammographic reporting.
Masroor I; Rasool M; Saeed SA; Sohail S
J Pak Med Assoc; 2016 Feb; 66(2):194-7. PubMed ID: 26819167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inter- and intraradiologist variability in the BI-RADS assessment and breast density categories for screening mammograms.
Redondo A; Comas M; Macià F; Ferrer F; Murta-Nascimento C; Maristany MT; Molins E; Sala M; Castells X
Br J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 85(1019):1465-70. PubMed ID: 22993385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammographic Breast Density Assessment Using Automated Volumetric Software and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) Categorization by Expert Radiologists.
Damases CN; Brennan PC; Mello-Thoms C; McEntee MF
Acad Radiol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 26514436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inter-observer variability in mammographic density assessment using Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (RANZCR) synoptic scales.
Damases CN; Mello-Thoms C; McEntee MF
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2016 Jun; 60(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 27059785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of variability in breast density assessment by BI-RADS category according to the level of experience.
Eom HJ; Cha JH; Kang JW; Choi WJ; Kim HJ; Go E
Acta Radiol; 2018 May; 59(5):527-532. PubMed ID: 28766978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description.
Baker JA; Kornguth PJ; Floyd CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Apr; 166(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 8610547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Women's features and inter-/intra-rater agreement on mammographic density assessment in full-field digital mammograms (DDM-SPAIN).
Pérez-Gómez B; Ruiz F; Martínez I; Casals M; Miranda J; Sánchez-Contador C; Vidal C; Llobet R; Pollán M; Salas D
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Feb; 132(1):287-95. PubMed ID: 22042363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Consistency of breast density categories in serial screening mammograms: A comparison between automated and human assessment.
Holland K; van Zelst J; den Heeten GJ; Imhof-Tas M; Mann RM; van Gils CH; Karssemeijer N
Breast; 2016 Oct; 29():49-54. PubMed ID: 27420382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Variation in Mammographic Breast Density Assessments Among Radiologists in Clinical Practice: A Multicenter Observational Study.
Sprague BL; Conant EF; Onega T; Garcia MP; Beaber EF; Herschorn SD; Lehman CD; Tosteson AN; Lacson R; Schnall MD; Kontos D; Haas JS; Weaver DL; Barlow WE;
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Oct; 165(7):457-464. PubMed ID: 27428568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Persistent inter-observer variability of breast density assessment using BI-RADS® 5th edition guidelines.
Portnow LH; Georgian-Smith D; Haider I; Barrios M; Bay CP; Nelson KP; Raza S
Clin Imaging; 2022 Mar; 83():21-27. PubMed ID: 34952487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The inter-observer variability of breast density scoring between mammography technologists and breast radiologists and its effect on the rate of adjuvant ultrasound.
Mazor RD; Savir A; Gheorghiu D; Weinstein Y; Abadi-Korek I; Shabshin N
Eur J Radiol; 2016 May; 85(5):957-62. PubMed ID: 27130056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in determining breast density according to the fifth edition of the BI-RADS® Atlas.
Pesce K; Tajerian M; Chico MJ; Swiecicki MP; Boietti B; Frangella MJ; Benitez S
Radiologia (Engl Ed); 2020; 62(6):481-486. PubMed ID: 32493654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inter-observer and intra-observer variability of mammogram interpretation: a field study.
Ciccone G; Vineis P; Frigerio A; Segnan N
Eur J Cancer; 1992; 28A(6-7):1054-8. PubMed ID: 1627374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reader variability in reporting breast imaging according to BI-RADS assessment categories (the Florence experience).
Ciatto S; Houssami N; Apruzzese A; Bassetti E; Brancato B; Carozzi F; Catarzi S; Lamberini MP; Marcelli G; Pellizzoni R; Pesce B; Risso G; Russo F; Scorsolini A
Breast; 2006 Feb; 15(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 16076556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Variability of Breast Density Classification Between US and UK Radiologists.
Alomaim W; O'Leary D; Ryan J; Rainford L; Evanoff M; Foley S
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2019 Mar; 50(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 30777249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment.
Berg WA; Campassi C; Langenberg P; Sexton MJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jun; 174(6):1769-77. PubMed ID: 10845521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of inter- and intra-observer variability of breast density assessments using the fourth and fifth editions of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System.
Alikhassi A; Esmaili Gourabi H; Baikpour M
Eur J Radiol Open; 2018; 5():67-72. PubMed ID: 29707614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammographic density and inter-observer variability of pathologic evaluation of core biopsies among women with mammographic abnormalities.
Trocchi P; Ursin G; Kuss O; Ruschke K; Schmidt-Pokrzywniak A; Holzhausen HJ; Löning T; Thomssen C; Böcker W; Kluttig A; Stang A
BMC Cancer; 2012 Nov; 12():554. PubMed ID: 23176326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Observer Variability of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Lexicon for Mammography.
Adibelli ZH; Ergenc R; Oztekin O; Ecevit S; Unal G; Abal Y
Breast Care (Basel); 2010 Mar; 5(1):11-16. PubMed ID: 22619635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Background echotexture classification in breast ultrasound: inter-observer agreement study.
Kim WH; Lee SH; Chang JM; Cho N; Moon WK
Acta Radiol; 2017 Dec; 58(12):1427-1433. PubMed ID: 28273746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
