These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26820461)

  • 21. Acute stress shifts the balance between controlled and automatic processes in prospective memory.
    Möschl M; Walser M; Plessow F; Goschke T; Fischer R
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2017 Oct; 144():53-67. PubMed ID: 28625494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The failure of deactivating intentions: aftereffects of completed intentions in the repeated prospective memory cue paradigm.
    Walser M; Fischer R; Goschke T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jul; 38(4):1030-44. PubMed ID: 22288817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Intention deactivation: effects of prospective memory task similarity on aftereffects of completed intentions.
    Walser M; Goschke T; Möschl M; Fischer R
    Psychol Res; 2017 Sep; 81(5):961-981. PubMed ID: 27522398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Distinct monitoring strategies underlie costs and performance in prospective memory.
    Koslov SR; Bulls LS; Lewis-Peacock JA
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Nov; 50(8):1772-1788. PubMed ID: 35386055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Failing to forget: prospective memory commission errors can result from spontaneous retrieval and impaired executive control.
    Scullin MK; Bugg JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):965-71. PubMed ID: 22799284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Commission errors with forced response lag.
    Schaper P; Grundgeiger T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Oct; 72(10):2380-2392. PubMed ID: 30862247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Is it relevant? Influence of trial manipulations of prospective memory context on task interference.
    Lourenço JS; Maylor EA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):687-702. PubMed ID: 23971415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Focal/nonfocal cue effects in prospective memory: monitoring difficulty or different retrieval processes?
    Scullin MK; McDaniel MA; Shelton JT; Lee JH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):736-49. PubMed ID: 20438269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Target context specification can reduce costs in nonfocal prospective memory.
    Lourenço JS; White K; Maylor EA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1757-64. PubMed ID: 23834056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of semantic context on prospective memory performance.
    Thomas BJ; McBride DM
    Memory; 2016; 24(3):315-23. PubMed ID: 25647351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prior task experience and comparable stimulus exposure nullify focal and nonfocal prospective memory retrieval differences.
    Hicks JL; Franks BA; Spitler SN
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Oct; 70(10):1997-2006. PubMed ID: 27461749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Internalizing versus externalizing control: different ways to perform a time-based prospective memory task.
    Huang T; Loft S; Humphreys MS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):1064-71. PubMed ID: 24548325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The role of noticing in prospective memory forgetting.
    Kliegel M; Guynn MJ; Zimmer H
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Jun; 64(3):226-32. PubMed ID: 17113673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The strategic control of prospective memory monitoring in response to complex and probabilistic contextual cues.
    Bugg JM; Ball BH
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Jul; 45(5):755-775. PubMed ID: 28275948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Retrieval in prospective memory: Multiple processes or just delay?
    Anderson FT; McDaniel MA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Sep; 72(9):2197-2207. PubMed ID: 30957661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Spontaneous retrieval reveals right-ear advantage in prospective memory.
    Rothen N; Meier B
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Apr; 71(4):940-948. PubMed ID: 28854849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of characteristics of target cues on task interference from prospective memory.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Jackson T; Yang H
    Neuroreport; 2009 Jan; 20(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 18978643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Automatic Retrieval of Newly Instructed Cue-Task Associations Seen in Task-Conflict Effects in the First Trial after Cue-Task Instructions.
    Meiran N; Pereg M
    Exp Psychol; 2017 Jan; 64(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 28219260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Proactive control processes in event-based prospective memory: Evidence from intraindividual variability and ex-Gaussian analyses.
    Ball BH; Brewer GA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):793-811. PubMed ID: 29239624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Superior parietal cortex and the attention to delayed intention: An rTMS study.
    Cona G; Marino G; Bisiacchi PS
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jan; 95():130-135. PubMed ID: 27993562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.