These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26820470)

  • 1. It takes a seasoned bird to be a good listener: communication between the sexes.
    Brenowitz EA; Remage-Healey L
    Curr Opin Neurobiol; 2016 Jun; 38():12-7. PubMed ID: 26820470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Zenk expression in auditory regions changes with breeding condition in male Black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus).
    Phillmore LS; Veysey AS; Roach SP
    Behav Brain Res; 2011 Dec; 225(2):464-72. PubMed ID: 21854811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. To modulate and be modulated: estrogenic influences on auditory processing of communication signals within a socio-neuro-endocrine framework.
    Yoder KM; Vicario DS
    Behav Neurosci; 2012 Feb; 126(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 22201281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Membrane G-Protein-Coupled Estrogen Receptor Is Necessary but Not Sufficient for Sex Differences in Zebra Finch Auditory Coding.
    Krentzel AA; Macedo-Lima M; Ikeda MZ; Remage-Healey L
    Endocrinology; 2018 Mar; 159(3):1360-1376. PubMed ID: 29351614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Songbird frequency selectivity and temporal resolution vary with sex and season.
    Gall MD; Salameh TS; Lucas JR
    Proc Biol Sci; 2013 Jan; 280(1751):20122296. PubMed ID: 23193125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamic sex-specific responses to synthetic songs in a duetting suboscine passerine.
    Fishbein AR; Löschner J; Mallon JM; Wilkinson GS
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202353. PubMed ID: 30157227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experience affects immediate early gene expression in response to conspecific call notes in black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus).
    Hahn AH; Guillette LM; Lee D; McMillan N; Hoang J; Sturdy CB
    Behav Brain Res; 2015; 287():49-58. PubMed ID: 25813748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neuroestrogens rapidly shape auditory circuits to support communication learning and perception: Evidence from songbirds.
    Vahaba DM; Remage-Healey L
    Horm Behav; 2018 Aug; 104():77-87. PubMed ID: 29555375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Coevolution in communication senders and receivers: vocal behavior and auditory processing in multiple songbird species.
    Woolley SM; Moore JM
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2011 Apr; 1225():155-65. PubMed ID: 21535002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ZENK activation in the nidopallium of black-capped chickadees in response to both conspecific and heterospecific calls.
    Avey MT; Bloomfield LL; Elie JE; Freeberg TM; Guillette LM; Hoeschele M; Lee H; Moscicki MK; Owens JL; Sturdy CB
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e100927. PubMed ID: 24963707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Species-Specific Auditory Forebrain Responses to Non-Learned Vocalizations in Juvenile Blackbirds.
    Lynch KS; Louder MIM; Hauber ME
    Brain Behav Evol; 2018; 91(4):193-200. PubMed ID: 29920477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Responses of a sub-oscine bird during playback: effects of different song variants and breeding period.
    Ríos-Chelén AA; Garcia CM
    Behav Processes; 2007 Mar; 74(3):319-25. PubMed ID: 17207941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Seasonal and sex-related variation in song control nuclei in a species with near-monomorphic song, the northern cardinal.
    Jawor JM; Macdougall-Shackleton SA
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Oct; 443(3):169-73. PubMed ID: 18692546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estrogen-dependent selectivity of genomic responses to birdsong.
    Maney DL; Cho E; Goode CT
    Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Mar; 23(6):1523-9. PubMed ID: 16553615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Species differences in auditory processing dynamics in songbird auditory telencephalon.
    Terleph TA; Mello CV; Vicario DS
    Dev Neurobiol; 2007 Sep; 67(11):1498-510. PubMed ID: 17525994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The sender-receiver matching hypothesis: support from the peripheral coding of acoustic features in songbirds.
    Gall MD; Brierley LE; Lucas JR
    J Exp Biol; 2012 Nov; 215(Pt 21):3742-51. PubMed ID: 22855616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early experience shapes vocal neural coding and perception in songbirds.
    Woolley SM
    Dev Psychobiol; 2012 Sep; 54(6):612-31. PubMed ID: 22711657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. From Perception to Action: The Role of Auditory Input in Shaping Vocal Communication and Social Behaviors in Birds.
    Elie JE; Hoffmann S; Dunning JL; Coleman MJ; Fortune ES; Prather JF
    Brain Behav Evol; 2019; 94(1-4):51-60. PubMed ID: 31805560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estradiol-dependent catecholaminergic innervation of auditory areas in a seasonally breeding songbird.
    Matragrano LL; Sanford SE; Salvante KG; Sockman KW; Maney DL
    Eur J Neurosci; 2011 Aug; 34(3):416-25. PubMed ID: 21714815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Regulatory mechanisms of testosterone-stimulated song in the sensorimotor nucleus HVC of female songbirds.
    Dittrich F; Ramenda C; Grillitsch D; Frankl-Vilches C; Ko MC; Hertel M; Goymann W; ter Maat A; Gahr M
    BMC Neurosci; 2014 Dec; 15():128. PubMed ID: 25442096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.